Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.basic.visual.misc > #2190
| From | "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.basic.visual.misc |
| Subject | Re: ICT magazine article on the Visual BASIC |
| Date | 2014-12-03 13:42 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <m5nldp$b8s$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <_UFfw.70528$SH2.23998@uutiset.elisa.fi> |
As Ralph said, there's VB and there's VB.Net. Since Microsoft ended support for VB many years ago, VB.Net is sometimes just called VB these days. Then there's also VBScript, which some people mistake for being VB. You're probably wanting to write about VB.Net. This group is mainly used by VB people. For .Net, try here: microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.vb Another interesting angle on this is the changes at Microsoft during the lifetime of their .Net tools. Originally .Net was designed for and targetted at "web services", which Microsoft was hoping would be a big business back around 2001. (Remember the "thin client" fad and the "Internet keyboard" fad? Companies like Microsoft were hoping, even back then, to make money selling services rather than software.) .Net was also targetted to take on Java server-side. When web services failed to materialize, Microsoft then pushed the idea that .Net was also for Desktop software. But it really wasn't, any more than Java was. So .Net never caught on for writing Windows software, but did become very popular for business use and server-side. More recently, Microsoft is trying to herd developers toward their RT sandbox, to write Metro phone and tablet apps. .Net is just one tool being re-purposed for writing RT trinkets, in addition to javascript and even C++. To really tell the story of VB.Net, whether or not you include the story of VB, I think it would be highly relevant to tell that story in light of the changing landscape, as described above. VB.Net has been around for about 13 years now and a lot has changed in that time. Here's the original .Net press release: http://web.archive.org/web/20101112114102/http://www.microsoft.com/Presspass/press/2000/jul00/pdcdeliverspr.mspx Here's an interesting one from 2005 about how Microsoft was trying to build something like Metro 10 years ago, a sandboxed OS on top of .Net, but failed due to the sheer bloat of .Net and ended up with Vista instead: http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,1820607,00.asp There are also numerous articles around about the transition from VB to .Net and how much resentment Microsoft caused by trying to force people into .Net for their own purposes. (Just as they're trying to force Metro apps now for their own profit, despite it being a bad business risk for programmers.) Here's an overview article from Dr. Dobbs website: http://web.archive.org/web/20050216183444/http://www.ddj.com/documents/s=9211/ddj050201dnn/ And here's another interesting angle from Joel Spolsky: http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/APIWar.html (I'm coming to appreciate archive.org lately. There seems to be a lot disappearing from the Internet in the past year or so.) "Antti J Ylikoski" <antti.ylikoski@gmail.com> wrote in message news:_UFfw.70528$SH2.23998@uutiset.elisa.fi... | I'm authoring an article for the Finnish ICT press on the practical | use of the BASIC language. | | The Microsoft Visual BASIC is a very well-known product; to my | knowledge, very often in commercial or industrial work, it is chosen | as the tool, because of its high quality as a software product, and | because it well supports the Microsoft environment, and it is | supported by the Microsoft Windows, and it has a very good IDE. | | I have never myself used the Visual BASIC, I only have talked with | individuals who have used it. | | In order to be able to write reasonably expert text on the Visual | BASIC, I would like to ask this newsgroup the following question. | Could some individuals who are knowledgeable about this topic, point | for me some pointers with useful information about the Visual BASIC; I | mean, the kind of information that would be useful in an ICT magazine | article. | | For example, an Internet article about the Visual BASIC, that I could | use as a reference, would be great. | | Finally, I have to admit that I always have liked Microsoft software | -- I have been using Windows since the era of Windows 3.11. | | regards, Dr Antti J Ylikoski | Helsinki, Finland, the EU
Back to comp.lang.basic.visual.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
ICT magazine article on the Visual BASIC Antti J Ylikoski <antti.ylikoski@gmail.com> - 2014-12-03 17:22 +0200 Re: ICT magazine article on the Visual BASIC ralph <nt_consulting@yahoo.com> - 2014-12-03 12:03 -0600 Re: ICT magazine article on the Visual BASIC "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2014-12-03 13:42 -0500 Re: ICT magazine article on the Visual BASIC GS <gs@somewhere.net> - 2014-12-03 16:58 -0500
csiph-web