Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.basic.visual.misc > #961
| From | GS <gs@somewhere.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.basic.visual.misc |
| Subject | Re: VBA in Word 2003 search & replace |
| Date | 2012-03-15 12:20 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <jjt4rr$eo6$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <31898569.3116.1331817430824.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbcwe9> |
This NG is for Classic VB, not MS OFFice VBA.
<FWIW>
Word is the wrong place to be authoring if you want smaller PDFs. I use
Excel (any version) to author but try to convert to PDF using at least
Excel 2007 for the smallest output PDF size. For example, a 65mb Word
file can be redone in Excel at approx 650kb with a resulting PDF under
500kb.
--
Garry
Free usenet access at http://www.eternal-september.org
ClassicVB Users Regroup!
comp.lang.basic.visual.misc
microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion
Back to comp.lang.basic.visual.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
VBA in Word 2003 search & replace Susan <bogenexcel@aol.com> - 2012-03-15 06:17 -0700 Re: VBA in Word 2003 search & replace ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.net> - 2012-03-15 11:13 -0500 Re: VBA in Word 2003 search & replace GS <gs@somewhere.net> - 2012-03-15 12:20 -0400 Re: VBA in Word 2003 search & replace "Clive Lumb" <clumb2@gratui_en_anglais.fr.invalid> - 2012-03-16 11:28 +0100
csiph-web