Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.basic.visual.misc > #881

Re: Using regsvr32 question

From "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam>
Newsgroups comp.lang.basic.visual.misc
Subject Re: Using regsvr32 question
Date 2012-03-07 09:58 -0500
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <jj7st8$4nb$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <jj6rk9$vj6$1@dont-email.me> <jj77ic$irb$1@speranza.aioe.org> <jj7a3o$thc$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw


| For example, the COMAddins loaded into my auto-instance of Excel where
| listed under HKLM. Any that were listed under HKCU weren't loaded. I'm
| trying to determine how the DLLs under HKLM got there...
|

  I never realized it was possible to register under HKCU. :)
Deanna's explanation makes sense to me. In general a
COM object is registered for use on the machine. That's
the main reason for having registration in the first place.
I have no ProgIDs at all under HKCU\Software\Classes\.
I've also written a number of DLLs in VB and none of them
registers under HKCU. And I don't see any Typelib key at
all under HKCU, which seems to indicate that nothing ever
has registered under HKCU.

   Out of curiosity, I wrote a short VBScript that creates
a dummy object:
  Set Obj = CreateObject("Slipshod.FileObject")
   MsgBox Obj.Something

  Running it with Regmon I saw WSH do 4 checks. It first
tried to open the HKCU key, then the HKLM key, then
repeated the same sequence. (This is on XP.) So it seems
to be feasible to register under HKCU, but very unusual. 

Back to comp.lang.basic.visual.misc | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Using regsvr32 question GS <gs@somewhere.net> - 2012-03-07 00:27 -0500
  Re: Using regsvr32 question Deanna Earley <dee.earley@icode.co.uk> - 2012-03-07 08:51 +0000
    Re: Using regsvr32 question GS <gs@somewhere.net> - 2012-03-07 04:34 -0500
      Re: Using regsvr32 question Deanna Earley <dee.earley@icode.co.uk> - 2012-03-07 10:24 +0000
        Re: Using regsvr32 question Deanna Earley <dee.earley@icode.co.uk> - 2012-03-07 10:31 +0000
      Re: Using regsvr32 question "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2012-03-07 09:58 -0500
        Re: Using regsvr32 question GS <gs@somewhere.net> - 2012-03-07 18:52 -0500
      Re: Using regsvr32 question "Farnsworth" <nospam@nospam.com> - 2012-03-07 22:24 -0500
        Re: Using regsvr32 question GS <gs@somewhere.net> - 2012-03-07 23:19 -0500
          Re: Using regsvr32 question "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2012-03-08 08:53 -0500
            Re: Using regsvr32 question GS <gs@somewhere.net> - 2012-03-08 09:33 -0500

csiph-web