Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.basic.visual.misc > #1571

Re: Strange Win 7 behavior using ComDlg32.OCX

From -mhd <not_real@invalid.com>
Newsgroups microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion, comp.lang.basic.visual.misc
Subject Re: Strange Win 7 behavior using ComDlg32.OCX
Date 2012-09-05 21:33 -0400
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <34vf489sbb2jdfo9cj1f504mljlijeacmn@4ax.com> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <k2256h$fqv$1@speranza.aioe.org> <ff8d481msccg6sdhvhiu429frjlupofopi@4ax.com> <k28g7m$u2l$1@dont-email.me> <r0lf481qmshvm4h6er0uv2k4048ghqv2u5@4ax.com> <k28me9$5ut$1@dont-email.me>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


Karl E. Peterson <karl@exmvps.org> wrote:

>It happens that -mhd formulated :
>> Karl E. Peterson <karl@exmvps.org> wrote:
>>
>>> 2010, you mean?  No chance it's the 64-bit version, is there?
>> No or else my 32bit addin wouldn't even load.
>
>Yeah, that's what I thought.  I believe it's possible to call out of 
>process, but probably not as an add-in.

True, an out of process 32bit app can still refer to the Outlook object in 64bit
Office.

>Yeah, if the VB6 thing is popping them outside of Outlook, there's 
>something pretty hinky going on.  I used to know a couple Outlook 
>add-on devs, I might be able to ask if they've ever seen anything like 
>that.

That would be nice if they could relate to any similar experience.

>You probably don't know if it happens with any of the other common 
>dialogs, do you?  That font one isn't used by anywhere near as many 
>apps as, say, the File one.

Unfortunately the Font dialog is the only one I use.

-mike

Back to comp.lang.basic.visual.misc | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Strange Win 7 behavior using ComDlg32.OCX -mhd <not_real@invalid.com> - 2012-09-02 16:34 -0400
  Re: Strange Win 7 behavior using ComDlg32.OCX "CoderX" <coder@x.com> - 2012-09-02 19:00 -0400
    Re: Strange Win 7 behavior using ComDlg32.OCX -mhd <not_real@invalid.com> - 2012-09-02 20:16 -0400
      Re: Strange Win 7 behavior using ComDlg32.OCX "Eduardo" <mm@mm.com> - 2012-09-03 08:44 -0300
        Re: Strange Win 7 behavior using ComDlg32.OCX -mhd <not_real@invalid.com> - 2012-09-04 21:00 -0400
          Re: Strange Win 7 behavior using ComDlg32.OCX Karl E. Peterson <karl@exmvps.org> - 2012-09-05 14:29 -0700
            Re: Strange Win 7 behavior using ComDlg32.OCX -mhd <not_real@invalid.com> - 2012-09-05 18:41 -0400
              Re: Strange Win 7 behavior using ComDlg32.OCX Karl E. Peterson <karl@exmvps.org> - 2012-09-05 16:15 -0700
                Re: Strange Win 7 behavior using ComDlg32.OCX -mhd <not_real@invalid.com> - 2012-09-05 21:33 -0400
  Re: Strange Win 7 behavior using ComDlg32.OCX "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2012-09-03 08:50 -0400
    Re: Strange Win 7 behavior using ComDlg32.OCX -mhd <not_real@invalid.com> - 2012-09-04 20:50 -0400
      Re: Strange Win 7 behavior using ComDlg32.OCX "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2012-09-04 22:29 -0400
        Re: Strange Win 7 behavior using ComDlg32.OCX -mhd <not_real@invalid.com> - 2012-09-05 00:02 -0400
  Re: Strange Win 7 behavior using ComDlg32.OCX "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2012-09-05 11:05 +0100
    Re: Strange Win 7 behavior using ComDlg32.OCX Karl E. Peterson <karl@exmvps.org> - 2012-09-05 14:24 -0700
    Re: Strange Win 7 behavior using ComDlg32.OCX -mhd <not_real@invalid.com> - 2012-09-05 18:36 -0400
    Re: Strange Win 7 behavior using ComDlg32.OCX -mhd <not_real@invalid.com> - 2012-09-13 12:12 -0400
      Re: Strange Win 7 behavior using ComDlg32.OCX -mhd <not_real@invalid.com> - 2012-09-13 14:50 -0400
        Re: Strange Win 7 behavior using ComDlg32.OCX justineclin@gmail.com - 2015-01-08 14:22 -0800
          Re: Strange Win 7 behavior using ComDlg32.OCX "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2015-01-08 18:20 -0500

csiph-web