Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.basic.visual.database > #10
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!news.nobody.at!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | The Dubious Khelair <khelair@contract.gateway.2wire.net> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.basic.visual.database |
| Subject | Re: ADODB.Recordset inaccessible |
| Date | Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:54:58 +0000 (UTC) |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 20 |
| Message-ID | <j4vgv1$hv1$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <j4qgih$emi$1@dont-email.me> <j4sljv$8kl$1@dont-email.me> |
| Injection-Date | Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:54:58 +0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="QWiYPFFSlHAA+owAanbPVw"; logging-data="18401"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/fuqOAR5h2W1Pbrued+zz2oFoayFWHguU=" |
| User-Agent | tin/1.8.3-20070201 ("Scotasay") (UNIX) (OpenBSD/4.9 (i386)) |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:d9YYT+4Vz0IG8PsDDogiF5EoK2M= |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.basic.visual.database:10 |
Show key headers only | View raw
I was wrong. The ADODB.Recordset object is still not behaving at all. It is saying that it doesn't have the .rows or .fields property; auto-completion when I put in the '.' following the recordset object only fills it in with the usual suspects (ie ToString and the other 4 or 5). Anybody that might help would be much appreciated. The Dubious Khelair <khelair@contract.gateway.2wire.net> wrote: > Okay; as I figured it was a problem that is seeming pretty > foolish. I haven't been able to try this out yet, but I believe it > sounds like a pretty plausible solution. > I was under the mistaken impression that my ADODB.Recordset > object was going to slurp in the entire results of my query, and that I > could immediately close the ADODB.Connection object when I was done with > it, being able to later peruse the Recordset object at my leisure. I've > been informed that this is not the case, however. I'm not used to this > environment, though; that's really something that I should've tried when > debugging but I didn't even think about it.
Back to comp.lang.basic.visual.database | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
ADODB.Recordset inaccessible The Dubious Khelair <khelair@contract.gateway.2wire.net> - 2011-09-14 15:17 +0000
Re: ADODB.Recordset inaccessible The Dubious Khelair <khelair@contract.gateway.2wire.net> - 2011-09-14 15:26 +0000
Re: ADODB.Recordset inaccessible The Dubious Khelair <khelair@contract.gateway.2wire.net> - 2011-09-15 10:55 +0000
Re: ADODB.Recordset inaccessible The Dubious Khelair <khelair@contract.gateway.2wire.net> - 2011-09-16 12:54 +0000
Re: ADODB.Recordset inaccessible Jason Keats <jkeats@melbpcDeleteThis.org.au> - 2011-09-17 18:30 +1000
csiph-web