Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.basic.powerbasic > #33
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | GS <gs@somewhere.net> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.basic.powerbasic |
| Subject | Re: Using 3rd party OCXs on PB dialog |
| Date | Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:43:36 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 69 |
| Message-ID | <jheo2s$132$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <jgrum9$ob0$1@dont-email.me> <4f3a5fdc$1@proxy.mimer.no> <jhdu2m$1ln$1@dont-email.me> <4f3a9423$1@proxy.mimer.no> <jheha3$nq0$1@dont-email.me> <4f3ad22d$1@proxy.mimer.no> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| Injection-Date | Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:43:40 +0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="UVJBuiIZprDyxzUkJsiwfw"; logging-data="1122"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX187sHTMTQgFZKpIxsgVgrKS" |
| X-Antivirus-Status | Clean |
| X-Newsreader | MesNews/1.08.03.00-gb |
| X-Antivirus | avast! (VPS 120214-1, 02/14/2012), Outbound message |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:2k2jIgyTRtYjax+oR+JrDby96Is= |
| X-ICQ | 543516788 |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.basic.powerbasic:33 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Olav wrote : > Den 14.02.2012 21:47, skrev GS: >> Olav has brought this to us : >>> Den 14.02.2012 16:19, skrev GS: >>>> Olav explained : >>>>> Den 07.02.2012 20:39, skrev GS: >>>>>> I've asked PB if this is doable but have not gotten a reply. >>>>> >>>>> You'd better get used to that. Not getting a reply I mean. >>>t>> >>>>> Nothing new at Powerbasic I see. >>>> >>>> Actually, as it turns out, my original email got lost in oblivion >>>> according to my mail server and so was returned undeliverable. My resend >>>> message was answered fairly promptly, and so was my reply. >>> >>> Well, this is quite a different story compared to what you said in >>> your initial message in this thread. Both statements can't be true. >> >> How so? I sent the original email to PB on Feb 4th hoping for a reply >> Mon the 5th. My original post in this NG was done Feb 7th after not >> hearing from PB. I got the 'no delivery' notice from my mail server Feb >> 9th. I resent the email to PB that same day and got a reply that same >> day. I sent a reply to that reply and got another reply the next day >> (Fri, Feb 10th). >> >> On what premise do you substantiate my statements as being conflicting? >> > > You said in your first message "...have not gotten a reply". Nothing more. > Nothing less.If you can't see this being in conflict with what you says later > on; well, that's your problem. > > In addition I find it strange that Bob Zale havn't show up in the thread and > corrected your statement. He has always been keen on rebuking statements he > means is false. > > So it is a bit hard to know whether your later explanation is true. Well, the time frame of the events as they occurred should point out that I was not aware my original email to PB did no get delivered until 2 days AFTER my original post. So.. my original statement was TRUE at the time I made the post. My subsequent posts occurred AFTER I resent my email to PB AND after they replied! How is it hard to know my later statement is true? Based on events occured at posting dates, both are true! I was merely stating how I was treated AFTER initial contact with PB was actually made. As for Bob showing up to correct my original statement.., as of Feb 7th PB wasn't aware I sent them an email. Nor was I aware it was not delivered. (Kind of wierd my mail server took so long to notify me, though. They usually do this within minutes of sending. also, it did not look like their usual notification!) Besides, I had already corrected it here in the post I made earlier today by accounting for how they handled my issue ONCE THEY ACTUALLY GOT MY EMAIL. It was not my intent to rebuff your comment, or to present adversity. I just wanted to state (for the record) how my communication with PB was handled. Hope this clears things up... -- Garry Free usenet access at http://www.eternal-september.org ClassicVB Users Regroup! comp.lang.basic.visual.misc
Back to comp.lang.basic.powerbasic | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Using 3rd party OCXs on PB dialog GS <gs@somewhere.net> - 2012-02-07 14:39 -0500
Re: Using 3rd party OCXs on PB dialog Chris Douce <chris.douce@skynet.invalid> - 2012-02-13 08:00 +0100
Re: Using 3rd party OCXs on PB dialog GS <gs@somewhere.net> - 2012-02-13 11:10 -0500
Re: Using 3rd party OCXs on PB dialog Olav <my.email.goes.here@there.tt> - 2012-02-14 14:21 +0100
Re: Using 3rd party OCXs on PB dialog GS <gs@somewhere.net> - 2012-02-14 10:19 -0500
Re: Using 3rd party OCXs on PB dialog Olav <my.email.goes.here@there.tt> - 2012-02-14 18:04 +0100
Re: Using 3rd party OCXs on PB dialog GS <gs@somewhere.net> - 2012-02-14 15:47 -0500
Re: Using 3rd party OCXs on PB dialog Olav <my.email.goes.here@there.tt> - 2012-02-14 22:29 +0100
Re: Using 3rd party OCXs on PB dialog GS <gs@somewhere.net> - 2012-02-14 17:43 -0500
Re: Using 3rd party OCXs on PB dialog Bob Zale <noreply@powerbasic.com> - 2012-02-15 03:41 -0800
Re: Using 3rd party OCXs on PB dialog GS <gs@somewhere.net> - 2012-02-15 14:27 -0500
Re: Using 3rd party OCXs on PB dialog WangoTango <Asgard24@mindspring.com> - 2012-02-15 16:24 -0500
Re: Using 3rd party OCXs on PB dialog GS <gs@somewhere.net> - 2012-02-15 16:56 -0500
csiph-web