Groups > comp.lang.basic.powerbasic > #30

Re: Using 3rd party OCXs on PB dialog

Path	csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	GS <gs@somewhere.net>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.basic.powerbasic
Subject	Re: Using 3rd party OCXs on PB dialog
Date	Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:47:59 -0500
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Lines	33
Message-ID	<jheha3$nq0$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	<jgrum9$ob0$1@dont-email.me> <4f3a5fdc$1@proxy.mimer.no> <jhdu2m$1ln$1@dont-email.me> <4f3a9423$1@proxy.mimer.no>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
Injection-Date	Tue, 14 Feb 2012 20:48:03 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info	mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="UVJBuiIZprDyxzUkJsiwfw"; logging-data="24384"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19AZjxan91qzAGAruQbMpmd"
X-Antivirus-Status	Clean
X-Newsreader	MesNews/1.08.03.00-gb
X-Antivirus	avast! (VPS 120214-0, 02/14/2012), Outbound message
Cancel-Lock	sha1:tyKuMGDwZxtSIbTSOhMM9l/R9qM=
X-ICQ	543516788
Xref	x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.basic.powerbasic:30

Show key headers only | View raw

Olav has brought this to us :
> Den 14.02.2012 16:19, skrev GS:
>> Olav explained :
>>> Den 07.02.2012 20:39, skrev GS:
>>>> I've asked PB if this is doable but have not gotten a reply.
>>>
>>> You'd better get used to that. Not getting a reply I mean.
>>>
>>> Nothing new at Powerbasic I see.
>>
>> Actually, as it turns out, my original email got lost in oblivion
>> according to my mail server and so was returned undeliverable. My resend
>> message was answered fairly promptly, and so was my reply.
>
> Well, this is quite a different story compared to what you said in your 
> initial message in this thread. Both statements can't be true.

How so? I sent the original email to PB on Feb 4th hoping for a reply 
Mon the 5th. My original post in this NG was done Feb 7th after not 
hearing from PB. I got the 'no delivery' notice from my mail server Feb 
9th. I resent the email to PB that same day and got a reply that same 
day. I sent a reply to that reply and got another reply the next day 
(Fri, Feb 10th).

On what premise do you substantiate my statements as being conflicting?

-- 
Garry

Free usenet access at http://www.eternal-september.org
ClassicVB Users Regroup! comp.lang.basic.visual.misc

Back to comp.lang.basic.powerbasic | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Using 3rd party OCXs on PB dialog GS <gs@somewhere.net> - 2012-02-07 14:39 -0500
  Re: Using 3rd party OCXs on PB dialog Chris Douce <chris.douce@skynet.invalid> - 2012-02-13 08:00 +0100
    Re: Using 3rd party OCXs on PB dialog GS <gs@somewhere.net> - 2012-02-13 11:10 -0500
  Re: Using 3rd party OCXs on PB dialog Olav <my.email.goes.here@there.tt> - 2012-02-14 14:21 +0100
    Re: Using 3rd party OCXs on PB dialog GS <gs@somewhere.net> - 2012-02-14 10:19 -0500
      Re: Using 3rd party OCXs on PB dialog Olav <my.email.goes.here@there.tt> - 2012-02-14 18:04 +0100
        Re: Using 3rd party OCXs on PB dialog GS <gs@somewhere.net> - 2012-02-14 15:47 -0500
          Re: Using 3rd party OCXs on PB dialog Olav <my.email.goes.here@there.tt> - 2012-02-14 22:29 +0100
            Re: Using 3rd party OCXs on PB dialog GS <gs@somewhere.net> - 2012-02-14 17:43 -0500
              Re: Using 3rd party OCXs on PB dialog Bob Zale <noreply@powerbasic.com> - 2012-02-15 03:41 -0800
                Re: Using 3rd party OCXs on PB dialog GS <gs@somewhere.net> - 2012-02-15 14:27 -0500
              Re: Using 3rd party OCXs on PB dialog WangoTango <Asgard24@mindspring.com> - 2012-02-15 16:24 -0500
                Re: Using 3rd party OCXs on PB dialog GS <gs@somewhere.net> - 2012-02-15 16:56 -0500

csiph-web