Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.basic.misc > #152 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jonathan de Boyne Pollard <J.deBoynePollard-newsgroups@NTLWorld.COM> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2011-09-27 16:50 +0100 |
| Last post | 2011-09-29 14:14 +0100 |
| Articles | 9 — 6 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.basic.misc
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: computer bootlaces Jonathan de Boyne Pollard <J.deBoynePollard-newsgroups@NTLWorld.COM> - 2011-09-27 16:50 +0100
Re: computer bootlaces "Tom Lake" <tlake@twcny.rr.com> - 2011-09-27 13:54 -0400
Re: computer bootlaces Patrick Scheible <kkt@zipcon.net> - 2011-09-27 12:57 -0700
Re: computer bootlaces Ben Yates <winston19842005@yahoo.com> - 2011-09-27 13:55 -0700
Re: computer bootlaces Jonathan de Boyne Pollard <J.deBoynePollard-newsgroups@NTLWorld.COM> - 2011-09-28 14:55 +0100
Re: computer bootlaces Stan Barr <plan.b@dsl.pipex.com> - 2011-09-28 18:30 +0000
Re: computer bootlaces Adam Funk <a24061@ducksburg.com> - 2011-09-28 19:40 +0100
Re: computer bootlaces Jonathan de Boyne Pollard <J.deBoynePollard-newsgroups@NTLWorld.COM> - 2011-09-29 09:56 +0100
Re: computer bootlaces Adam Funk <a24061@ducksburg.com> - 2011-09-29 14:14 +0100
| From | Jonathan de Boyne Pollard <J.deBoynePollard-newsgroups@NTLWorld.COM> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-09-27 16:50 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: computer bootlaces |
| Message-ID | <IU.D20110927.T155030.P20955.Q0@J.de.Boyne.Pollard.localhost> |
> Verity Stob: > > BASIC programmers ring up technical support centres to ask questions > like "What are those funny numbers with letters in them?" What dialect(s) of BASIC don't have &H or equivalent?
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Tom Lake" <tlake@twcny.rr.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-09-27 13:54 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <j5t2l9$rv5$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #152 |
"Jonathan de Boyne Pollard" wrote in message news:IU.D20110927.T155030.P20955.Q0@J.de.Boyne.Pollard.localhost... > Verity Stob: > > BASIC programmers ring up technical support centres to ask questions > like "What are those funny numbers with letters in them?" What dialect(s) of BASIC don't have &H or equivalent? True BASIC and Decimal BASIC are just two. There are others. Tom L
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Patrick Scheible <kkt@zipcon.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-09-27 12:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <861uv1dahn.fsf@zipcon.net> |
| In reply to | #152 |
Jonathan de Boyne Pollard <J.deBoynePollard-newsgroups@NTLWorld.COM> writes: >> Verity Stob: >> >> BASIC programmers ring up technical support centres to ask questions >> like "What are those funny numbers with letters in them?" > > What dialect(s) of BASIC don't have &H or equivalent? The first dialect of BASIC I was exposed to, for one, HP-2000 BASIC. -- Patrick
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ben Yates <winston19842005@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-09-27 13:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <33211745.100.1317156959228.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqbr29> |
| In reply to | #152 |
BASIC for the TI-99/4 (TI BASIC and Extended BASIC)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jonathan de Boyne Pollard <J.deBoynePollard-newsgroups@NTLWorld.COM> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-09-28 14:55 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <IU.D20110928.T135548.P2564.Q0@J.de.Boyne.Pollard.localhost> |
| In reply to | #152 |
>>> Verity Stob: >>> >>> BASIC programmers ring up technical support centres to ask questions >>> like "What are those funny numbers with letters in them?" >> >> What dialect(s) of BASIC don't have &H or equivalent? > > FWIW, she wrote that in 1988. I don't recall seeing hexadecimal > notation in BASIC around that time. Xe is supposedly British, and BBC BASIC, which has & for hexadecimal notation, had been around for seven years at that point.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stan Barr <plan.b@dsl.pipex.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-09-28 18:30 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <9eh7dtFupnU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #156 |
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 14:55:34 +0100, Jonathan de Boyne Pollard <J.deBoynePollard-newsgroups@NTLWorld.COM> wrote: >>>> Verity Stob: >>>> >>>> BASIC programmers ring up technical support centres to ask questions >>>> like "What are those funny numbers with letters in them?" >>> >>> What dialect(s) of BASIC don't have &H or equivalent? >> >> FWIW, she wrote that in 1988. I don't recall seeing hexadecimal >> notation in BASIC around that time. > > Xe is supposedly British, and BBC BASIC, which has & for hexadecimal > notation, had been around for seven years at that point. LBASIC (LDOS, TRS-80, circa 1980) had &H for Hex and &O for Octal. -- Cheers, Stan Barr plan.b .at. dsl .dot. pipex .dot. com The future was never like this!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Adam Funk <a24061@ducksburg.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-09-28 19:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <m96cl8xaj2.ln2@news.ducksburg.com> |
| In reply to | #156 |
On 2011-09-28, Jonathan de Boyne Pollard wrote: >>>> Verity Stob: >>>> >>>> BASIC programmers ring up technical support centres to ask questions >>>> like "What are those funny numbers with letters in them?" >>> >>> What dialect(s) of BASIC don't have &H or equivalent? >> >> FWIW, she wrote that in 1988. I don't recall seeing hexadecimal >> notation in BASIC around that time. > > Xe is supposedly British, and BBC BASIC, which has & for hexadecimal > notation, had been around for seven years at that point. I never used BBC Basic, so I'll take your word for it. I'm fairly sure both kinds I used on the Apple ][ range didn't have hexadecimal, and a bit less sure that Turbo Basic didn't have it. -- When Elaine turned 11, her mother sent her to train under Donald Knuth in his mountain hideaway. [XKCD 342]
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jonathan de Boyne Pollard <J.deBoynePollard-newsgroups@NTLWorld.COM> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-09-29 09:56 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <IU.D20110929.T085639.P3673.Q0@J.de.Boyne.Pollard.localhost> |
| In reply to | #158 |
>> Xe is supposedly British, and BBC BASIC, which has & for hexadecimal >> notation, had been around for seven years at that point. > > I never used BBC Basic, so I'll take your word for it. I'm fairly > sure both kinds I used on the Apple ][ range didn't have hexadecimal, > and a bit less sure that Turbo Basic didn't have it. Turbo BASIC, like some others, has (prefixed) $ for hexadecimal notation.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Adam Funk <a24061@ducksburg.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-09-29 14:14 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <rh7el8x9dj.ln2@news.ducksburg.com> |
| In reply to | #159 |
On 2011-09-29, Jonathan de Boyne Pollard wrote: >>> Xe is supposedly British, and BBC BASIC, which has & for hexadecimal >>> notation, had been around for seven years at that point. >> >> I never used BBC Basic, so I'll take your word for it. I'm fairly >> sure both kinds I used on the Apple ][ range didn't have hexadecimal, >> and a bit less sure that Turbo Basic didn't have it. > > Turbo BASIC, like some others, has (prefixed) $ for hexadecimal notation. OK, I'll take your word for that too. I don't remember using hexadecimal in it, and I don't know where the disks are or whether it would run in DOSBox. -- The generation of random numbers is too important to be left to chance. [Robert R. Coveyou]
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.basic.misc
csiph-web