Re: Sorting: 1 to 99

From	who where <noone@home.net>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.basic.misc
Subject	Re: Sorting: 1 to 99
Date	2012-03-20 07:25 +0800
Message-ID	<vvffm7hhsju2h1d3am7e9sen5to2fe1sto@4ax.com> (permalink)
References	<2oM9r.4774$%E2.520@viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 07:09:21 +1100, "DonH" <donlhumphries@bigpond.com>
wrote:

>CLS
>REM ============================================================
>REM  To SORT any numbers 1 to 99; but no repeats.
>REM  (This compares sort-numbers with Nos.1 to 99,
>REM          and not with each other.)

It compares to a pre-ordained list (in this case 1-99).  That is a
fairly inflexible routine.  Why bother creating this when a normal
bubble sort is far more general in the data it can handle?

Back to comp.lang.basic.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Sorting: 1 to 99 "DonH" <donlhumphries@bigpond.com> - 2012-03-20 07:09 +1100
  Re: Sorting: 1 to 99 who where <noone@home.net> - 2012-03-20 07:25 +0800
  Re: Sorting: 1 to 99 "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2012-03-20 15:08 +0100
    Re: Sorting: 1 to 99 "DonH" <donlhumphries@bigpond.com> - 2012-03-21 06:58 +1100
      Re: Sorting: 1 to 99 Todd Vargo <tlvargo@sbcglobal.netz> - 2012-03-20 20:05 -0500
      Re: Sorting: 1 to 99 "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2012-03-21 22:51 +0100
        Re: Sorting: 1 to 99 Todd Vargo <tlvargo@sbcglobal.netz> - 2012-03-22 23:57 -0400
      Re: Sorting: 1 to 99 - a possible non-sorting sorting solution "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2012-03-23 10:21 +0100
  Re: Sorting: 1 to 99 Antti J Ylikoski <antti.ylikoski@tkk.fi> - 2012-03-21 09:28 +0200

csiph-web