Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.basic.misc > #71
| From | "Helge Haensel" <dj1wm@nurfuerspam.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.basic.misc |
| Subject | Re: A basic for W7 |
| Date | 2011-06-05 09:39 +0200 |
| Organization | dj1wm |
| Message-ID | <op.vwld7llosjedh2@dj1wm.fqdn.th-h.de> (permalink) |
| References | <op.vwjuz4azsjedh2@dj1wm.fqdn.th-h.de> <Xns9EFA90BB05298auricauricauricauric@88.198.244.100> |
Am 04.06.2011, 23:12 Uhr, schrieb Auric__ <not.my.real@email.address>:
> Helge Haensel wrote:
>
>> Which one of the different here discussed basics is compatible with
>> W7/64
>> and most similar to VB5 so that a more or less easy transfer is
>> possible.
>
> Compatibility with VB is gonna kick your ass here. As far as I know,
> very few
> BASICs try to be VB-compatible to any degree.
>
> The best I can suggest would be REALbasic (or "Real Studio" or whatever
> they
> want to call it this week):
> http://www.realsoftware.com/realstudio/
>
> There's a page aimed at VB developers with some sales points here:
> http://www.realsoftware.com/realstudio/vbdevelopers.php
>
> It's not 100% compatible, not by a long shot, but it's fairly VB-like,
> and
> there's a free VB-to-RB converter ("Visual Basic Migration Assistant")
> which
> isn't TOO bad. According to the VB page, "Most developers find that their
> projects port in hours or days, rather than weeks or months required in
> other
> environments." (I don't know about large apps, but I have a simple app
> launcher that I converted from VB6 to RB5 in a few hours.)
>
> It looks like Win7 and Win64 are both supported in RB, but I don't run
> Win7
> (and I don't write for it either) so I can't say for sure.
>
> (For the record, I like RB, but don't actually use it for very much;
> most of
> my apps are Linux console apps, written in FreeBASIC, or Win32 apps
> written
> in PowerBASIC -- neither of which is anything like VB.)
>
> There are, of course, other alternatives, but I think RB might be the
> best
> match you'll find. (Drop the "VB compatiblity" requirement and the door
> opens
> to many other possibilities.)
>
Thanks Auric for your suggestions. I will check the url's and then decide
howe to continue.
Helge
Back to comp.lang.basic.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
A basic for W7 "Helge Haensel" <dj1wm@nurfuerspam.de> - 2011-06-04 13:46 +0200
Re: A basic for W7 "Auric__" <not.my.real@email.address> - 2011-06-04 21:12 +0000
Re: A basic for W7 "Helge Haensel" <dj1wm@nurfuerspam.de> - 2011-06-05 09:39 +0200
Re: A basic for W7 Helmut_Meukel <Helmut_Meukel@bn-hof.invalid> - 2011-06-05 11:21 +0200
Re: A basic for W7 "Helge Haensel" <dj1wm@nurfuerspam.de> - 2011-06-05 12:34 +0200
Re: A basic for W7 "Auric__" <not.my.real@email.address> - 2011-06-05 17:43 +0000
Re: A basic for W7 Helmut_Meukel <Helmut_Meukel@bn-hof.invalid> - 2011-06-06 00:16 +0200
Re: A basic for W7 "Helge Haensel" <dj1wm@nurfuerspam.de> - 2011-06-06 16:20 +0200
Re: A basic for W7 "Helge Haensel" <dj1wm@nurfuerspam.de> - 2011-06-07 17:00 +0200
Re: A basic for W7 Helmut_Meukel <Helmut_Meukel@bn-hof.invalid> - 2011-06-07 18:05 +0200
Re: A basic for W7 Karl E. Peterson <karl@exmvps.org> - 2011-06-15 15:10 -0700
Re: A basic for W7 "Auric__" <not.my.real@email.address> - 2011-06-16 02:36 +0000
Re: A basic for W7 Karl E. Peterson <karl@exmvps.org> - 2011-06-16 11:52 -0700
csiph-web