Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot > #3976
| From | Karl Ratzsch <mail.kfr@gmx.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot |
| Subject | Re: consistency of function .vs. data plotting |
| Date | 2018-06-25 23:55 +0200 |
| Organization | solani.org |
| Message-ID | <pgroda$cj0$1@solani.org> (permalink) |
| References | <a7122b88-09e6-4e90-a094-09d175c8b66b@googlegroups.com> <pgqssb$odo$1@solani.org> |
Am 25.06.2018 um 16:06 schrieb Karl Ratzsch: > > As a workaround, you could do sth like following > > f(x) = ... > plot "+" us 1:(imag(f(x) =0 ? f(x) : NaN) > should of course read plot "+" us 1:(imag(f(x))==0 ? f(x) : NaN)
Back to comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
consistency of function .vs. data plotting palme@kapott.org - 2018-06-19 09:41 -0700
Re: consistency of function .vs. data plotting Karl Ratzsch <mail.kfr@gmx.net> - 2018-06-25 16:06 +0200
Re: consistency of function .vs. data plotting Karl Ratzsch <mail.kfr@gmx.net> - 2018-06-25 23:55 +0200
Re: consistency of function .vs. data plotting palme@kapott.org - 2018-06-25 08:43 -0700
csiph-web