Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot > #442
| From | sfeam <sfeam@users.sourceforge.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot |
| Subject | Re: Postscript fill pattern broken? |
| Followup-To | comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot |
| Date | 2011-07-17 09:32 -0700 |
| Organization | gnuplot development team |
| Message-ID | <ivv2q7$gbu$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <98g4n1F3o9U1@mid.individual.net> |
Followups directed to: comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot
Ingo Thies wrote: > Hi, > > I have noticed some strange behaviour with fill patterns in > Postscript. I don't know since when it is present, but at least > gnuplot 4.4 or later (CVS version from July) seems to be affected. > > When I try to use pattern fill in Postscript the pattern for > fillecurves appears to be extremely pixeled, rather than smooth as in > the style test page. Your test script produces an acceptable plot when run here. I suspect you have hit the well known long-standing bug in ghostscript that fails to correctly render pattern fill if antialiasing is enabled. Try turning off antialiasing in your viewer, or try sending the file to a real postscript printer rather than rendering it in ghostscript. Ethan > I am wondering how the patterns on the test page (i.e. with the > command "test") are actually created. But obviously not using the > actual commands for pattern-filled rectangles. > > Here is an example script (note that the current gnuplot syntax only > works with data-based curves rather than functions for fill between > two curves; for this reason 'set table' is used. If there is an easier > way, please describe this in the manual, if not already done so): > > reset > set term push > set term postscript eps size 15cm,10cm "Helvetica" 20 > set output 'testfill.eps' > set samples 100 > set xrange [-2.*pi:+2.*pi] > set yrange [-1.1:2.4] > set table 'tmp.asc' > plot sin(x)+0.5 > unset table > set style fill pattern 4 > plot 'tmp.asc' u 1:($2-0.5):($2+0.5) w filledcu > unset output > set term pop > > I would have expected that "fill pattern" would draw lines, but > actually a pixeled pattern is used (use the magnifying function in > ghostview). But please note that the sample pattern in the key looks > OK, only the plotted pattern looks chunky. > > Is there a workaround, or is this an old and not yet resolved bug? > > Best whishes, > > Ingo
Back to comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Postscript fill pattern broken? Ingo Thies <ingo.thies@gmx.de> - 2011-07-17 15:00 +0200
Filledcurves with manual color also broken? Ingo Thies <ingo.thies@gmx.de> - 2011-07-17 18:00 +0200
Re: Filledcurves with manual color also broken? sfeam <sfeam@users.sourceforge.net> - 2011-07-17 09:33 -0700
Re: Filledcurves with manual color also broken? Ingo Thies <ingo.thies@gmx.de> - 2011-07-17 18:39 +0200
Re: Filledcurves with manual color also broken? Ingo Thies <ingo.thies@gmx.de> - 2011-07-17 18:36 +0200
Re: Postscript fill pattern broken? sfeam <sfeam@users.sourceforge.net> - 2011-07-17 09:32 -0700
Re: Postscript fill pattern broken? Ingo Thies <ingo.thies@gmx.de> - 2011-07-17 18:59 +0200
csiph-web