Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot > #261
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | sfeam <sfeam@users.sourceforge.net> |
| Newsgroups | comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot |
| Subject | Re: Stacked boxes |
| Followup-To | comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot |
| Date | Thu, 14 Apr 2011 14:00:44 -0700 |
| Organization | gnuplot development team |
| Lines | 71 |
| Message-ID | <io7na7$hti$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <4da3355c$0$12295$c3e8da3$aae71a0a@news.astraweb.com> <invdk4$11m$1@dont-email.me> <4da344aa$0$5610$c3e8da3$10cdda79@news.astraweb.com> |
| Reply-To | sfeam@users.sourceforge.net |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7Bit |
| Injection-Date | Thu, 14 Apr 2011 21:00:55 +0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | mx03.eternal-september.org; posting-host="joalffpZlyHxFtpFd/PRrw"; logging-data="18354"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX197EwwHt4G1ChXE0EjWKNoK" |
| User-Agent | KNode/4.4.3 |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:cTridLvGOCywfvO+4glp1cPxG/k= |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot:261 |
Followups directed to: comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot
Show key headers only | View raw
Mike Rhodes wrote: > On 4/11/2011 1:26 PM, sfeam wrote: >> Mike Rhodes wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I have an issue I've been trying to use AWK to get around but I've ended >>> up here to ask about a feature implementation. >>> >>> I am trying to use boxes to plot total throughput from netflow data. I >>> like the fact that I can specify the width of the box -- I set that to >>> the duration of the flow. But my frustration comes from the fact that >>> the boxes do not stack when they overlap. Instead, they overlay each >>> other. This only allows me to graph the maximum single-flow throughput, >>> rather than total throughput at any given time. Does anyone know if >>> there are any plans for box stacking in future versions of gnuplot? >> >> Is it possible that you are looking for one of the stacked histogram >> modes? E.g. plots 5-7 in >> >> http://gnuplot.sourceforge.net/demo/histograms.html > > That's not quite what I'm looking for. The variable width of the box is > a crucial piece of data in the plots I'm doing. > >> If that's not what you had in mind, could you post a link to some >> plot somewhere that is in the style you are thinking of? > > Here is a sample plot: > http://s3.amazonaws.com/3tbVapQP/box_overlay_example.png > > This is the data: > > 1302350771.016 0.003040 1.752 > 1302350788.681 0.047432 4.548 > 1302350792.845 0.032472 1.120 > 1302350792.901 0.021536 0.172 > 1302350793.217 0.023680 0.420 > 1302350800.717 0.025024 0.492 > 1302350814.777 0.001248 0.000 > 1302350814.781 0.001248 0.020 > 1302350823.701 0.019568 0.228 > 1302350830.432 0.000832 0.096 > > Notice how, in the box just after 6:30, there is one box inside another? > What I'm looking for it to do is to jump up above the existing box, so > that it shows the total throughput at that time (the sum of the > overlapped boxes) instead of just the largest box. After thinking about what would need to be added to gnuplot to produce the plot you ask for, I have decided that it is possible already with a slight change to the input data format. As I understand it, your data above consists of 3 entries Time(midpoint) height Time(width) If you split each line into records instead: Time(start) height Time(end) -height then the following command produces the plot you want: plot 'data' using 1:2 smooth cumulative with steps output is here: http://tinyurl.com/3nncaet
Back to comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Stacked boxes Mike Rhodes <M8R-1cd059@mailinator.com> - 2011-04-11 13:07 -0400
Re: Stacked boxes sfeam <sfeam@users.sourceforge.net> - 2011-04-11 10:26 -0700
Re: Stacked boxes Mike Rhodes <M8R-1cd059@mailinator.com> - 2011-04-11 14:12 -0400
Re: Stacked boxes sfeam <sfeam@users.sourceforge.net> - 2011-04-11 17:41 -0700
Re: Stacked boxes Mike Rhodes <M8R-1cd059@mailinator.com> - 2011-04-11 20:48 -0400
Re: Stacked boxes Mike Rhodes <M8R-1cd059@mailinator.com> - 2011-04-13 16:06 -0400
Re: Stacked boxes sfeam <sfeam@users.sourceforge.net> - 2011-04-13 15:07 -0700
Re: Stacked boxes James Waldby <not@valid.invalid> - 2011-04-14 00:12 +0000
Re: Stacked boxes sfeam <sfeam@users.sourceforge.net> - 2011-04-14 08:57 -0700
Re: Stacked boxes Mike Rhodes <M8R-1cd059@mailinator.com> - 2011-04-14 13:03 -0400
Re: Stacked boxes sfeam <sfeam@users.sourceforge.net> - 2011-04-14 14:00 -0700
Re: Stacked boxes Mike Rhodes <M8R-1cd059@mailinator.com> - 2011-04-14 17:29 -0400
Re: Stacked boxes sfeam <sfeam@users.sourceforge.net> - 2011-04-14 15:59 -0700
Re: Stacked boxes Mike Rhodes <M8R-1cd059@mailinator.com> - 2011-04-14 21:56 -0400
csiph-web