Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot > #3674
| Newsgroups | comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-06 23:34 -0700 |
| References | (4 earlier) <ogrdkh$4tc$1@solani.org> <ec3a75fe-478f-458a-a42d-4629c2cf45a5@googlegroups.com> <91f133a9-ec73-423a-fb72-de13397f48aa@t-online.de> <f8c271a2-88bb-4951-8db3-f65800bdd512@googlegroups.com> <epl279FkmeU1@mid.dfncis.de> |
| Message-ID | <bd839b06-b64d-4888-be75-e83d2a508e4c@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: What's new in gnuplot 5.2 |
| From | "hugocoolens@gmail.com" <hugocoolens@gmail.com> |
Op maandag 5 juni 2017 14:47:38 UTC+2 schreef Hans-Bernhard Bröker: > Am 05.06.2017 um 10:32 schrieb hugocoolens@gmail.com: > > Op zaterdag 3 juni 2017 22:45:42 UTC+2 schreef Hans-Bernhard Bröker: > > >> Often the function can be transformed a bit to lift such requirements. > >> In this case, you could just fit > >> > >> f(x) = 10 * log10(a**2 / (1 + (x / b)**2)) > >> > >> or > >> > >> f(x) = 20 * log10a - 10 * log10(1 + (x / b)**2) > \ > > > thank you very much for your help, I tried out > > f(x) = 20 * log10a - 10 * log10(1 + (x / b)**2) but that didn't make > > any difference. However f(x) = 10 * log10(a**2 / (1 + (x / b)**2)) does make a difference but "a" still becomes negative for certain fitting intervals. > > Part of the trick is that this doesn't actually matter. The function is > identical for parameters a and -a, so you can just throw away the sign > afterwards. The requirement that a be positive was an artificial one > from the beginning. I admit this wasn't a good example to make my point. However I still wonder why increasing the fitting interval toggles the value of "a" from positive to negative. kind regards, Hugo
Back to comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
What's new in gnuplot 5.2 Raoul Fleckman <raoul.fleckman@gmail.com> - 2017-05-26 21:13 +0000
Re: What's new in gnuplot 5.2 "hugocoolens@gmail.com" <hugocoolens@gmail.com> - 2017-05-31 23:16 -0700
Re: What's new in gnuplot 5.2 Karl Ratzsch <mail.kfr@gmx.net> - 2017-06-02 10:18 +0200
Re: What's new in gnuplot 5.2 "hugocoolens@gmail.com" <hugocoolens@gmail.com> - 2017-06-02 02:32 -0700
Re: What's new in gnuplot 5.2 Karl Ratzsch <mail.kfr@gmx.net> - 2017-06-02 12:11 +0200
Re: What's new in gnuplot 5.2 "hugocoolens@gmail.com" <hugocoolens@gmail.com> - 2017-06-03 12:49 -0700
Re: What's new in gnuplot 5.2 Hans-Bernhard Bröker <HBBroeker@t-online.de> - 2017-06-03 22:45 +0200
Re: What's new in gnuplot 5.2 "hugocoolens@gmail.com" <hugocoolens@gmail.com> - 2017-06-05 01:32 -0700
Re: What's new in gnuplot 5.2 Hans-Bernhard Bröker <HBBroeker@t-online.de> - 2017-06-05 14:47 +0200
Re: What's new in gnuplot 5.2 "hugocoolens@gmail.com" <hugocoolens@gmail.com> - 2017-06-06 23:34 -0700
Re: What's new in gnuplot 5.2 Dr Engelbert Buxbaum <engelbert_buxbaum@hotmail.com> - 2017-06-07 14:26 +0200
csiph-web