Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot > #312
| From | Ingo Thies <ingo.thies@gmx.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot |
| Subject | Re: Wrong fit direction / zrange / unreadable graph file |
| Date | 2011-05-16 16:31 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <93cqpmF1a3U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <01ac512a-8031-41f0-a899-0684927f6c32@n10g2000yqf.googlegroups.com> <iqqpas$cec$1@gwdu112.gwdg.de> <93c9dhFmvmU1@mid.individual.net> <iqqs4o$fkv$1@gwdu112.gwdg.de> |
On 16.05.2011 11:52, Christoph Bersch wrote: > To reproduce the problem: > > data.dat: > 1 2.1 > 2 2.9 > 3 4.2 > 4 5.05 > 5 6 > > n = 0 > f(x) = m*x + n > fit f(x) 'data.dat' via m,n Strange. I see no reason for this since n is merely an additional offset which could, depending on the function, even be negative. And the DNLS1E routine from SLATEC doesn't have any problems here. How is fitting done in gnuplot in particular? BTW DNSL1E returns the following best-fit results, even with initial n=m=0.0: m = 0.995 +/- 0.041 n = 1.065 +/- 0.135 as does gnuplot with non-zero initial n. Maybe that routine has some singular matrix trap which gnuplot doesn't have. Ingo
Back to comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Wrong fit direction / zrange / unreadable graph file Katharina Miwege <k.miwege@googlemail.com> - 2011-05-15 23:59 -0700
Re: Wrong fit direction / zrange / unreadable graph file Christoph Bersch <usenet@bersch.net> - 2011-05-16 11:04 +0200
Re: Wrong fit direction / zrange / unreadable graph file Ingo Thies <ingo.thies@gmx.de> - 2011-05-16 11:34 +0200
Re: Wrong fit direction / zrange / unreadable graph file Christoph Bersch <usenet@bersch.net> - 2011-05-16 11:52 +0200
Re: Wrong fit direction / zrange / unreadable graph file Richard Owlett <rowlett@pcnetinc.com> - 2011-05-16 06:25 -0500
Re: Wrong fit direction / zrange / unreadable graph file Christoph Bersch <usenet@bersch.net> - 2011-05-16 14:44 +0200
Re: Wrong fit direction / zrange / unreadable graph file Ingo Thies <ingo.thies@gmx.de> - 2011-05-16 16:31 +0200
Re: Wrong fit direction / zrange / unreadable graph file Katharina Miwege <k.miwege@googlemail.com> - 2011-05-16 09:01 -0700
Re: Wrong fit direction / zrange / unreadable graph file Christoph Bersch <usenet@bersch.net> - 2011-05-17 08:46 +0200
Re: Wrong fit direction / zrange / unreadable graph file Hans-Bernhard Bröker <HBBroeker@t-online.de> - 2011-05-19 01:34 +0200
Re: Wrong fit direction / zrange / unreadable graph file Hans-Bernhard Bröker <HBBroeker@t-online.de> - 2011-05-19 01:49 +0200
Re: Wrong fit direction / zrange / unreadable graph file Ingo Thies <ingo.thies@gmx.de> - 2011-05-19 11:07 +0200
Re: Wrong fit direction / zrange / unreadable graph file Hans-Bernhard Bröker <HBBroeker@t-online.de> - 2011-05-19 14:02 +0200
Re: Wrong fit direction / zrange / unreadable graph file Hans-Bernhard Bröker <HBBroeker@t-online.de> - 2011-05-19 01:39 +0200
Re: Wrong fit direction / zrange / unreadable graph file Ingo Thies <ingo.thies@gmx.de> - 2011-05-19 10:58 +0200
csiph-web