Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot > #1551
| Newsgroups | comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-12-21 07:32 -0800 |
| References | <4da37e57-cdcd-474e-a3c3-7e98f09b1cb6@googlegroups.com> <kb1i3c$st5$1@news.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de> |
| Message-ID | <5c431d1b-bbc9-418b-8707-588d0ff79beb@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: fit gives different results for identical functions with different var names |
| From | Marcus Hanson <marcus.hanson@gmail.com> |
On Friday, December 21, 2012 5:42:08 AM UTC-6, Karl wrote: > Have you initialized all your variables identically for the three > functions? And put all the right variable names in the "via" statement? > Does it help to put all the variables in the function argument list? I have the correct 'via' statements and I have initialized the variables. Here is exactly what I have done: gnuplot>aa=1;ma=1;sa=1;xa=1; gnuplot>fa(xa,aa,ma,sa)=aa*exp(-(xa-ma)**2/(2*sa**2)) gnuplot>fit fa(xa,aa,ma,sa) 'test.dat' u 1:2 via aa,ma,sa This gives aa=55,ma=0.98,sa=1 (rounded off values) with enormous standard errors (on the order of 10^16 to 10^19). These numbers do not even remotely fit the data. On the other hand, I have tried the following: gnuplot>a=1;m=1;s=1;x=1; gnuplot>f(x)=a*exp(-(x-m)**2/(2*s**2)) gnuplot>fit f(x) 'test.dat' u 1:2 via a,m,s This gives a=236,m=-1,s=-2.6 (also rounded), with standard errors less than 10%. This also fits the function remarkably well by all measures I know. I tried various different variable names of more than one character, and they all gave exactly identical results, all of them very wrong. Could this be some setting I accidentally changed a while ago in gnuplot?
Back to comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
fit gives different results for identical functions with different var names marcus.hanson@gmail.com - 2012-12-20 13:01 -0800
Re: fit gives different results for identical functions with different var names Brendan Halpin <brendan.halpin@ul.ie> - 2012-12-21 00:55 +0000
Re: fit gives different results for identical functions with different var names Karl <mail.kfr@gmx.net> - 2012-12-21 12:42 +0100
Re: fit gives different results for identical functions with different var names Marcus Hanson <marcus.hanson@gmail.com> - 2012-12-21 07:32 -0800
Re: fit gives different results for identical functions with different var names Hans-Bernhard Bröker <HBBroeker@t-online.de> - 2012-12-21 19:21 +0100
Re: fit gives different results for identical functions with different var names Marcus Hanson <marcus.hanson@gmail.com> - 2012-12-21 11:54 -0800
Re: fit gives different results for identical functions with different var names Hans-Bernhard Bröker <HBBroeker@t-online.de> - 2012-12-22 01:31 +0100
csiph-web