Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot > #2350

Re: Major and minor ticks artifact

Path csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news.albasani.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From Hermann Peifer <peifer@gmx.eu>
Newsgroups comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot
Subject Re: Major and minor ticks artifact
Date Sun, 16 Mar 2014 01:54:09 +0100
Organization albasani.net
Lines 15
Message-ID <5324F631.8070005@gmx.eu> (permalink)
References <levp7j$tvo$1@speranza.aioe.org> <bnhe21F5utsU1@mid.dfncis.de> <lg01bh$dlr$1@speranza.aioe.org> <53244732.8080404@gmx.eu> <lg2ill$a1i$1@speranza.aioe.org>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Trace news.albasani.net oXpcZR+3/0HcYUmwmottjlJqmzOeKTFyBFHz/1HOdN37IqECfleNf/iV4FAgTUws8uRb0Q1vT/dX70cYdTFMLaXga0qbz0hWGkGkeCt41SyGQsXuWf3Cg9IMUk0OnyHT
NNTP-Posting-Date Sun, 16 Mar 2014 00:54:10 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info news.albasani.net; logging-data="OpOryl8c+D4ip+5/W7ZV5XSlIWxos/17O4vzojWGNWDxhUBRsNbURSsqqrXig7iW6GQFquVlwNffq+zFLq3Ji7rq+kOwqCrGDASR0A8q2FiHHg5ZIyHnVFC51yZXEcTG"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@albasani.net"
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
To Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou@hotmail.com>
In-Reply-To <lg2ill$a1i$1@speranza.aioe.org>
Cancel-Lock sha1:YOeKOBV+snx0QvRwXoOwd94ehME=
Xref csiph.com comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot:2350

Show key headers only | View raw


On 2014-03-15 23:02, Janis Papanagnou wrote:
> You would better iterate over an _integer_ range, the number
> of tics[**] - this is also the value that you already have available, BTW -,
> and multiply for every tic the counted integer number with the FP increment.
> To illustrate in a fragment of pseudo-code
>
>      ## example range [ 0.0 .. 1.0 ], with inc=0.1

Thanks for explaining and illustrating the issue. Increments of 0.1 are 
indeed a pain. People should simply change their thinking and coding to 
inc=0.125, or apply the integer method you described.

Hermann

Back to comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Major and minor ticks artifact Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou@hotmail.com> - 2014-03-02 18:19 +0100
  Re: Major and minor ticks artifact Hans-Bernhard Bröker <HBBroeker@t-online.de> - 2014-03-02 20:10 +0100
    Re: Major and minor ticks artifact Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou@hotmail.com> - 2014-03-14 23:54 +0100
      Re: Major and minor ticks artifact sfeam <sfeam@users.sourceforge.net> - 2014-03-14 22:17 -0700
        Re: Major and minor ticks artifact Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou@hotmail.com> - 2014-03-15 10:54 +0100
          Re: Major and minor ticks artifact Karl <mail.kfr@gmx.net> - 2014-03-18 18:38 +0100
            Re: Major and minor ticks artifact Hermann Peifer <peifer@gmx.eu> - 2014-03-20 07:10 +0100
      Re: Major and minor ticks artifact Hermann Peifer <peifer@gmx.eu> - 2014-03-15 13:27 +0100
        Re: Major and minor ticks artifact Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou@hotmail.com> - 2014-03-15 23:02 +0100
          Re: Major and minor ticks artifact Hermann Peifer <peifer@gmx.eu> - 2014-03-16 01:54 +0100
            Re: Major and minor ticks artifact Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou@hotmail.com> - 2014-03-21 05:52 +0100
          Re: Major and minor ticks artifact Dan Luecking <LookInSig@uark.edu> - 2014-03-20 12:24 -0500
            Re: Major and minor ticks artifact Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou@hotmail.com> - 2014-03-21 05:54 +0100

csiph-web