Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot > #3613
| Newsgroups | comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-05 09:21 -0700 |
| References | <51e94c93-b07f-421a-aaa7-35378e81e01f@googlegroups.com> <obtb6h$ptk$1@solani.org> <55d7ab13-0a81-481b-9a81-728b7156117d@googlegroups.com> <obv5s9$33d$1@solani.org> |
| Message-ID | <0d68b8c8-a986-4f39-8572-cc3725c5cd4f@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: Point size default |
| From | jacques.Lebourlot@obspm.fr |
> What's wrong with > using an empirical value instead? > I have to find an empirical value while "mousing around" (live demo, or looking for the best view point). Then I want to get a nice picture in my textbook, hence, I switch from wxt to pdf cairo, ...and I have to find another empirical value. So, I'd like compute directly the right one by: "Scaling_factor = 1.0 / terminal_default_value" > There are two variables GPVAL_VIEW_ROT_(X/Z) I may try to use that just before saving the PDF. Thanks for the tip.
Back to comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Point size default jacques.Lebourlot@obspm.fr - 2017-04-03 01:27 -0700
Re: Point size default Karl Ratzsch <mail.kfr@gmx.net> - 2017-04-03 13:20 +0200
Re: Point size default jacques.Lebourlot@obspm.fr - 2017-04-03 06:57 -0700
Re: Point size default Karl Ratzsch <mail.kfr@gmx.net> - 2017-04-04 06:02 +0200
Re: Point size default jacques.Lebourlot@obspm.fr - 2017-04-05 09:21 -0700
Re: Point size default Ethan A Merritt <EAMerritt@gmail.com> - 2017-04-05 21:25 -0700
Re: Point size default jacques.Lebourlot@obspm.fr - 2017-04-08 05:10 -0700
csiph-web