Re: CodeBase for C

From	"Geoff Barnard" <geoff@jgb17.co.uk>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c, comp.databases.xbase.codebase
Subject	Re: CodeBase for C
Date	2016-11-24 22:49 +0000
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<o17qoa$1t9e$2@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	<o0upi3$l85$1@dont-email.me>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Hello,

Don't know?   Please detail just what you mean.

I'm using CodeBase 5 (Sequiter) both single user and via network, with some 
fairly large files, and generally it's pretty fast, but it's really 
dependant on memory available, and programming, and just what any specific 
program is trying to do.   To answer your question in the limited way you 
ask it, I'd need to create a program that does the same 'task' on the same 
system (network or stand alone ?) and time each.

If an operation can be made server-intensive, I'd expect that the SQL 
version could be faster.   If there's a LOT of user interaction required, 
then I'd expect that the CodeBase version could be faster.   Again, memory 
available could make a difference.

Happy to discuss further?

Geoff


"Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:o0upi3$l85$1@dont-email.me...
>
> Anyone used it before? Is it faster than SQLite?

Back to comp.databases.xbase.codebase | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

CodeBase for C "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 20:33 +0800
  Re: CodeBase for C "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 20:35 +0800
  Re: CodeBase for C "Geoff Barnard" <geoff@jgb17.co.uk> - 2016-11-24 22:49 +0000
    Re: CodeBase for C "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-25 16:59 +0800
      Re: CodeBase for C "Geoff Barnard" <geoff@jgb17.co.uk> - 2016-11-25 13:46 +0000

csiph-web