Path: csiph.com!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Geoff Barnard" Newsgroups: comp.lang.c,comp.databases.xbase.codebase Subject: Re: CodeBase for C Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 22:49:50 -0000 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Lines: 27 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 4bzk8FBSFJSkdUKepansVg.user.gioia.aioe.org X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 X-Priority: 3 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:97428 comp.databases.xbase.codebase:21 Hello, Don't know? Please detail just what you mean. I'm using CodeBase 5 (Sequiter) both single user and via network, with some fairly large files, and generally it's pretty fast, but it's really dependant on memory available, and programming, and just what any specific program is trying to do. To answer your question in the limited way you ask it, I'd need to create a program that does the same 'task' on the same system (network or stand alone ?) and time each. If an operation can be made server-intensive, I'd expect that the SQL version could be faster. If there's a LOT of user interaction required, then I'd expect that the CodeBase version could be faster. Again, memory available could make a difference. Happy to discuss further? Geoff "Mr. Man-wai Chang" wrote in message news:o0upi3$l85$1@dont-email.me... > > Anyone used it before? Is it faster than SQLite?