Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.databases.sybase > #589
| From | Antony <albion26.eve@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.databases.sybase |
| Subject | Re: Force sp_post_xpload (DBCC REINDEX) to use more engines? |
| Date | 2011-12-12 14:00 -0800 |
| Organization | http://groups.google.com |
| Message-ID | <1585141.404.1323727211907.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prmw6> (permalink) |
| References | <89550cd9-9383-47e4-9f72-00609e388869@u6g2000vbg.googlegroups.com> |
We have done the same migration many times. You can't really use sp_post_xpload on databases over 10-20Gb as it's too slow (I'm not sure why, but it is). As Bret says, best to get a DDL script to drop all indexes except APL clustered and rebuild them on the Linux serer. You can also then make it 3 or 4 scripts to run concurrently. Remember also you'll need to bcp out/in any tables with TEXT columns as these will likely be corrupted (the documentation isn't really clear on that point - we found out the hard way :)
Back to comp.databases.sybase | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
Force sp_post_xpload (DBCC REINDEX) to use more engines? pow43 <faber_38@yahoo.no> - 2011-12-03 01:58 -0800 Re: Force sp_post_xpload (DBCC REINDEX) to use more engines? bret_halford@msn.com - 2011-12-06 10:57 -0800 Re: Force sp_post_xpload (DBCC REINDEX) to use more engines? Antony <albion26.eve@gmail.com> - 2011-12-12 14:00 -0800
csiph-web