Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.databases.postgresql > #534 > unrolled thread
| Started by | cancedda@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-01-19 10:15 -0800 |
| Last post | 2014-01-21 16:24 +0100 |
| Articles | 4 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.databases.postgresql
PostgreSQL replication using DRBD multi primary + GFS2?? cancedda@gmail.com - 2014-01-19 10:15 -0800
Re: PostgreSQL replication using DRBD multi primary + GFS2?? Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr> - 2014-01-19 21:38 +0100
Re: PostgreSQL replication using DRBD multi primary + GFS2?? cancedda@gmail.com - 2014-01-21 07:01 -0800
Re: PostgreSQL replication using DRBD multi primary + GFS2?? Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr> - 2014-01-21 16:24 +0100
| From | cancedda@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-01-19 10:15 -0800 |
| Subject | PostgreSQL replication using DRBD multi primary + GFS2?? |
| Message-ID | <cbdd63f8-a168-48d7-a30d-0dd06097afaf@googlegroups.com> |
Hi everyone, As per subject, would such a setup work? What I need is the fastest replication possible and the second PostgreSQL server should be a read only just to run reports and selects. Thanks for the answers.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-01-19 21:38 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <m2k3dvhflg.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr> |
| In reply to | #534 |
cancedda@gmail.com writes: > What I need is the fastest replication possible and the second PostgreSQL > server should be a read only just to run reports and selects. http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/interactive/hot-standby.html -- Dimitri Fontaine PostgreSQL DBA, Architecte
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | cancedda@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-01-21 07:01 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <28bcf6e3-95bd-471c-bd81-eac2214aefef@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #535 |
On Sunday, 19 January 2014 20:38:35 UTC, Dimitri Fontaine wrote: > **@gmail.com writes: > > > What I need is the fastest replication possible and the second PostgreSQL > > > server should be a read only just to run reports and selects. > > > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/interactive/hot-standby.html > > > > -- > > Dimitri Fontaine > > PostgreSQL DBA, Architecte Hi Dimitri, Thanks for the answer. We tried that already but long queries being run on the master break replication and make running queries on the slave impossible to complete. Or that's what I got reading about the error. Please let me know if I'm wrong. Kind regards, Marco
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-01-21 16:24 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <m2lhy91hpb.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr> |
| In reply to | #536 |
cancedda@gmail.com writes: > We tried that already but long queries being run on the master break > replication and make running queries on the slave impossible to complete. > > Or that's what I got reading about the error. When using Hot Standby you need to be careful about the setup, which is quite different if you are implementing HA or load balancing. With async replication you always are going to have conflicts to handle, here as the stanbdy is read-only the conflicts are limited to replaying actions from the primary that are incompatible with the queries run on the standby. See the following parameters to help PostgreSQL figure out you're wanting to implement Load Balancing: max_standby_streaming_delay = '20 mins' hot_standby_feedback = on Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine PostgreSQL DBA, Architecte
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.databases.postgresql
csiph-web