Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.databases.postgresql > #575
| From | jimktrains@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.databases.postgresql |
| Subject | Re: pg vs mongodb? why do people want redis and mongodb if they have pg? |
| Date | 2014-07-07 01:49 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <lpcuad$104$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <5a64293f-7992-42ae-824e-fd11929b4307@googlegroups.com> <12c2c35c-8033-474d-aca4-bc442422b54e@googlegroups.com> |
Redis is faster and lighter weight than a transactional db. For instance, for caching or ephemeral information (sessions) it's perfect, and doesn't add to the workload of your server. Just because you're using redis doesn't mean you don't need another db, just as postgres.
Back to comp.databases.postgresql | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
pg vs mongodb? why do people want redis and mongodb if they have pg? johannes falcone <visphatesjava@gmail.com> - 2014-05-08 01:01 -0700
Re: pg vs mongodb? why do people want redis and mongodb if they have pg? johannes falcone <visphatesjava@gmail.com> - 2014-05-10 15:40 -0700
Re: pg vs mongodb? why do people want redis and mongodb if they have pg? jimktrains@gmail.com - 2014-07-07 01:49 +0000
csiph-web