Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.databases.postgresql > #247

Re: MySQL vs Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB

Newsgroups comp.databases.mysql, comp.databases.postgresql
From Ignoramus21330 <ignoramus21330@NOSPAM.21330.invalid>
Subject Re: MySQL vs Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB
References <H9idndjaqY3Xb_fTnZ2dnUVZ_sGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <Mlb*t+XMt@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>
Message-ID <aYmdnU_PzfKWNvHTnZ2dnUVZ_t-dnZ2d@giganews.com> (permalink)
Date 2011-09-11 07:35 -0500

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On 2011-09-11, Matthew Woodcraft <mattheww@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
> Ignoramus5263  <ignoramus5263@NOSPAM.5263.invalid> wrote:
>>So... Can Postgres support a 5-10 TB database with the use pattern
>>stated above?
>
> If nobody here gives you a concrete answer, I suggest asking on the
> pgsql-performance mailing list; it's the sort of question they're used
> to answering.
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/
>
> -M-

Thanks. I sbuscribed and sent the same question, slightly reworded, to that list.

Back to comp.databases.postgresql | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

MySQL vs Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB Ignoramus5263 <ignoramus5263@NOSPAM.5263.invalid> - 2011-09-10 00:14 -0500
  Re: MySQL vs Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB Michael Vilain <vilain@NOspamcop.net> - 2011-09-09 23:30 -0700
    Re: MySQL vs Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB Luuk <Luuk@invalid.lan> - 2011-09-10 10:13 +0200
    Re: MySQL vs Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB Ignoramus13208 <ignoramus13208@NOSPAM.13208.invalid> - 2011-09-10 09:34 -0500
      Re: MySQL vs Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB John Levine <johnl@iecc.com> - 2011-09-10 19:47 +0000
        Re: MySQL vs Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB Ignoramus13208 <ignoramus13208@NOSPAM.13208.invalid> - 2011-09-10 16:02 -0500
          Re: MySQL vs Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-09-11 15:40 +0100
          Re: MySQL vs Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB Axel Schwenke <axel.schwenke@gmx.de> - 2011-09-11 18:11 +0200
            Re: MySQL vs Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB Ignoramus21330 <ignoramus21330@NOSPAM.21330.invalid> - 2011-09-11 12:07 -0500
      Re: MySQL vs Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB Norman Peelman <npeelmandog@cfl.rr.com> - 2011-09-10 19:06 -0400
  Re: MySQL vs Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB Matthew Woodcraft <mattheww@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2011-09-11 10:24 +0100
    Re: MySQL vs Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB Ignoramus21330 <ignoramus21330@NOSPAM.21330.invalid> - 2011-09-11 07:35 -0500
  Re: MySQL vs Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB Bodo <bodo@nomail.org.invalid> - 2011-09-23 13:01 +0200

csiph-web