Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.databases.ms-sqlserver > #1580

Re: update field with the same value

From Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net>
Newsgroups comp.databases.ms-sqlserver
Subject Re: update field with the same value
Date 2011-02-11 12:05 -0800
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <ei5bl61u0lt3d4ma7l78c7i2sbjlolfvj3@4ax.com> (permalink)
References <a375a396-34fb-4b90-a4cf-f966939b0161@n16g2000prc.googlegroups.com> <Xns9E8964D22953FYazorman@127.0.0.1> <37015ddb-d725-40d9-b5e9-218144f2b08d@o7g2000prn.googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:14:55 -0800 (PST), migurus <migurus@yahoo.com>
wrote:

[snip]

>To see all pros and cons (complexity, extra effort, etc) I'd like to
>undesrtand is SQL Server smart not
>to update columns whose value was not changed?

     It does not matter.  You can not do anything about it either way.
And if you did find out, it could easily change in another release.

     (You are tilting at windwheels.)

Sincerely,

Gene Wirchenko

Back to comp.databases.ms-sqlserver | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

update field with the same value migurus <migurus@yahoo.com> - 2011-02-10 16:38 -0800
  Re: update field with the same value Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-02-11 12:05 -0800
  Re: update field with the same value Erland Sommarskog <esquel@sommarskog.se> - 2011-02-11 08:54 +0000
    Re: update field with the same value migurus <migurus@yahoo.com> - 2011-02-11 11:14 -0800
  Re: update field with the same value Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-02-10 17:18 -0800

csiph-web