Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.databases.ms-sqlserver > #1679
| Newsgroups | comp.databases.ms-sqlserver |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-11 13:49 -0800 |
| References | <ldan3d$f0i$1@dont-email.me> <XnsA2D0F0AEE3E6Yazorman@127.0.0.1> <lddcn4$i2b$1@dont-email.me> <XnsA2D1DEE31704BYazorman@127.0.0.1> |
| Message-ID | <db324895-b223-441a-8a26-180da7b3981f@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: A question about relationship |
| From | rja.carnegie@gmail.com |
On Tuesday, 11 February 2014 20:54:38 UTC, Erland Sommarskog wrote: > Tony Johansson (johansson.andersson@telia.com) writes: > > Yes a customer without order sounds ok > > But order without customer is incorrect. > > I would say that it depends on the business rules. :-) But, yes, it > would be a bit peculiar. > > In Northwind CustomerID is nullable, although there is no such order > in the data. Unfortunately, Northwind leaves a whole lot desired when it > comes to nullability, indexes etc. I don't remember if I ever worked in the Northwind database. (My actual training was some of the authentic courses for SQL Server 7.) So I don't know if some of its features are included intentionally to attract criticism for extra credit in class - you know, spot the little design mistakes. That can be good practice for real work. Or if it's just not particularly well done. It bothers me a little that most database courses I've seen are about developing yet another new customer and order database for a business, when that's the last thing that the world needs - unless you have an amazing new idea about how to do it. Maybe that's what they're looking for? But I suppose that (1) it's really about understanding how data table relationships work and how to use SQL to talk to your database, and (2) it's businessy. Whereas a course based around recording a kindergarten class's personal achievements, family relationships and friend and unfriendships, allergies, and favourite colours, TV shows, etc., for instance, might be too "out there". Although curiously, I run the database for - :-) Also... I /actually/ work in a room of around 30 men and, as far as I've noticed, 1 woman. That's not right. I should have my own office.
Back to comp.databases.ms-sqlserver | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
A question about relationship "Tony Johansson" <johansson.andersson@telia.com> - 2014-02-10 15:18 +0100
Re: A question about relationship Erland Sommarskog <esquel@sommarskog.se> - 2014-02-10 23:39 +0100
Re: A question about relationship "Tony Johansson" <johansson.andersson@telia.com> - 2014-02-11 15:39 +0100
Re: A question about relationship Ross Presser <rpresser@gmail.com> - 2014-02-11 07:11 -0800
Re: A question about relationship bradbury9 <ray.bradbury9@gmail.com> - 2014-02-11 08:43 -0800
Re: A question about relationship Ross Presser <rpresser@gmail.com> - 2014-02-11 09:33 -0800
Re: A question about relationship Lennart Jonsson <erik.lennart.jonsson@gmail.com> - 2014-02-11 18:01 +0100
Re: A question about relationship Erland Sommarskog <esquel@sommarskog.se> - 2014-02-11 21:54 +0100
Re: A question about relationship rja.carnegie@gmail.com - 2014-02-11 13:49 -0800
Re: A question about relationship Erland Sommarskog <esquel@sommarskog.se> - 2014-02-11 23:23 +0100
csiph-web