Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.databases.ms-sqlserver > #1990
| From | Erland Sommarskog <esquel@sommarskog.se> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.databases.ms-sqlserver |
| Subject | Re: Using sp_getapplock outside a transaction |
| Date | 2017-11-27 11:56 +0100 |
| Organization | Erland Sommarskog |
| Message-ID | <XnsA83A797965E4BYazorman@127.0.0.1> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <20171125182411.7cc99cc41acef664ea224b1c@gmail.com> <XnsA838DBBEAC219Yazorman@127.0.0.1> <20171126194310.7f5514c0300678d88cf17eaa@gmail.com> <XnsA839CAC1E58E4Yazorman@127.0.0.1> <20171127113428.2629ecf62d24b8131d42d13f@g{oogle}mail.com> |
Anton Shepelev (anton.txt@g{oogle}mail.com) writes:
> Indeed. An inner BEGIN TRAN only increments the
> counter, an inner COMMIT TRAN decrements it, but (!)
> ROLLBACK TRAN does actually undo the the outer
> transaction and sets the counter to zero. This is
> all very unintuitive to me, and requires special
> handling of ROLLBACKs in both T-SQL code and the
> client application.
>
It becomes more intuitive if you stop to think in terms of "outer
transaction". A transaction is all there is. So the ROLLBACK will
roll back it all.
The point with BEGIN/COMMIT increase @@trancount is that it makes
it easier to nest procedures that both start transactions.
Back to comp.databases.ms-sqlserver | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Using sp_getapplock outside a transaction Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> - 2017-11-25 14:56 +0300
Re: Using sp_getapplock outside a transaction rja.carnegie@gmail.com - 2017-11-25 05:37 -0800
Re: Using sp_getapplock outside a transaction Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> - 2017-11-25 18:24 +0300
Re: Using sp_getapplock outside a transaction rja.carnegie@gmail.com - 2017-11-25 08:36 -0800
Re: Using sp_getapplock outside a transaction Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> - 2017-11-25 21:13 +0300
Re: Using sp_getapplock outside a transaction rja.carnegie@gmail.com - 2017-11-25 16:21 -0800
Re: Using sp_getapplock outside a transaction Erland Sommarskog <esquel@sommarskog.se> - 2017-11-25 21:36 +0100
Re: Using sp_getapplock outside a transaction Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> - 2017-11-26 19:43 +0300
Re: Using sp_getapplock outside a transaction Erland Sommarskog <esquel@sommarskog.se> - 2017-11-26 19:55 +0100
Re: Using sp_getapplock outside a transaction Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@g{oogle}mail.com> - 2017-11-27 11:34 +0300
Re: Using sp_getapplock outside a transaction Erland Sommarskog <esquel@sommarskog.se> - 2017-11-27 11:56 +0100
Re: Using sp_getapplock outside a transaction rja.carnegie@gmail.com - 2017-11-27 14:23 -0800
Re: Using sp_getapplock outside a transaction Erland Sommarskog <esquel@sommarskog.se> - 2017-11-28 08:50 +0100
Re: Using sp_getapplock outside a transaction Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@g{oogle}mail.com> - 2017-11-29 15:11 +0300
Re: Using sp_getapplock outside a transaction Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@g{oogle}mail.com> - 2017-11-29 15:22 +0300
Re: Using sp_getapplock outside a transaction Erland Sommarskog <esquel@sommarskog.se> - 2017-11-29 13:44 +0100
Re: Using sp_getapplock outside a transaction Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@g{oogle}mail.com> - 2017-11-29 18:44 +0300
Re: Using sp_getapplock outside a transaction Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@g{oogle}mail.com> - 2017-11-29 19:42 +0300
Re: Using sp_getapplock outside a transaction rja.carnegie@gmail.com - 2017-11-30 13:19 -0800
csiph-web