Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.databases.ms-sqlserver > #1686
| From | Erland Sommarskog <esquel@sommarskog.se> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.databases.ms-sqlserver |
| Subject | Re: More about relationship in a database |
| Date | 2014-02-16 19:42 +0100 |
| Organization | Erland Sommarskog |
| Message-ID | <XnsA2D6C885F7C41Yazorman@127.0.0.1> (permalink) |
| References | <ldqsci$ths$1@dont-email.me> |
Tony Johansson (johansson.andersson@telia.com) writes: > Assume I have a table in the database called Inventory. > Now what is a resonable design type between Inventory and Product. > Where should the foreign key be placed ? That depends on what's in these tables. If a given product can be associated with one given invetory at a time, the InventoryId would be a foreign-key column in the Products table. On the other hand, if the Inventory table contains something like the stock of all products at all warehouses, the ProductId column would be a foreign- key column in Inventory. -- Erland Sommarskog, Stockholm, esquel@sommarskog.se
Back to comp.databases.ms-sqlserver | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
More about relationship in a database "Tony Johansson" <johansson.andersson@telia.com> - 2014-02-16 18:26 +0100 Re: More about relationship in a database Erland Sommarskog <esquel@sommarskog.se> - 2014-02-16 19:42 +0100
csiph-web