Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.databases.ms-sqlserver > #681
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Erland Sommarskog <esquel@sommarskog.se> |
| Newsgroups | comp.databases.ms-sqlserver, microsoft.public.sqlserver.server |
| Subject | Re: BLOB storage options |
| Date | Tue, 27 Sep 2011 22:56:54 +0200 |
| Organization | Erland Sommarskog |
| Lines | 28 |
| Message-ID | <Xns9F6DE9717B25BYazorman@127.0.0.1> (permalink) |
| References | <3ac80097-f67b-4e86-9062-a1cb4a51b80a@m37g2000yqc.googlegroups.com> <Xns9F6CDD526413FYazorman@127.0.0.1> <d879a6b7-c547-483e-bf63-619c1823c4b2@n15g2000vbn.googlegroups.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=windows-1252 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| Injection-Info | mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="nBFDv6s1VJQDuF1w6hpX2A"; logging-data="3217"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18INQ8TdpAA19dMrV/dw6sp" |
| User-Agent | Xnews/2006.08.24 Mime-proxy/2.1.c.0 (Win32) |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:WGwji6VPEUurgMs87fLAQAU/ZX8= |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.databases.ms-sqlserver:681 |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
Bill E. Hollywood, FL (behrreich@compuserve.com) writes: > I'm not sure how large the database will be for just data, but I am > expecting three or four thousand document uploads per month once > things get going. Therefore, the file storage and retrieval component > will not be trivial. It's hard to say how large the documents might > be because they could be in many formats. Let's assume an average of > 500 kB per document and about 4,000 documents per month -- that gives > us 2GB per month of just document storage. 500 kB appears a tad high to me, but that is just gut feeling. But even if we accept this number - after three years the database will be 72 GB - provided that documents are kept "forever" and not archived anywere. To be honest, I am not sure that this warrants a more complex solution to make it easier to have a development database, unless are other reasons you want a document-less database for development. True, restoring 72 GB takes longer time than restoring 1GB, but it's not an operation I expect you do very often. -- Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, esquel@sommarskog.se Links for SQL Server Books Online: SQL 2008: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/sqlserver/cc514207.aspx SQL 2005: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/sqlserver/bb895970.aspx
Back to comp.databases.ms-sqlserver | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
BLOB storage options "Bill E. Hollywood, FL" <behrreich@compuserve.com> - 2011-09-26 04:14 -0700
Re: BLOB storage options Erland Sommarskog <esquel@sommarskog.se> - 2011-09-26 21:45 +0200
Re: BLOB storage options "Bill E. Hollywood, FL" <behrreich@compuserve.com> - 2011-09-27 07:50 -0700
Re: BLOB storage options Erland Sommarskog <esquel@sommarskog.se> - 2011-09-27 22:56 +0200
Re: BLOB storage options "Bill E. Hollywood, FL" <behrreich@compuserve.com> - 2011-09-27 15:01 -0700
csiph-web