Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.databases.ms-sqlserver > #672
| From | Erland Sommarskog <esquel@sommarskog.se> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.databases.ms-sqlserver |
| Subject | Re: Merge Replication DB backup/restore |
| Date | 2011-09-19 22:52 +0200 |
| Organization | Erland Sommarskog |
| Message-ID | <Xns9F65E8A59E51CYazorman@127.0.0.1> (permalink) |
| References | <1f293759-b2c8-4bf8-bdaf-7b73f58fb425@bi2g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <6105fa41-9896-41b4-9e1e-41b5b07be7c3@z41g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> |
Jimbo (james.goodwill@googlemail.com) writes: > I've done some testing on this, and I think as long as I use the 'WITH > KEEP_REPLICATION' clause in my restore database commands, it should > hang together. > > I've restored to a non-replicated environment, and made changes to the > database, and restored back in to the replicated arena (all restores > with KEEP_REPLICATION). Replication started and completed at the > publisher okay, and my changes were replicated to my two subscribers. > > I'd still appreciate any thought other people might have on this > subject. Given the low traffic in the newsgroups these days, it may be better to ask in this web forum: http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/sqlreplication/threads I don't do replication, so I don't want to try to answer your question. -- Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, esquel@sommarskog.se Links for SQL Server Books Online: SQL 2008: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/sqlserver/cc514207.aspx SQL 2005: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/sqlserver/bb895970.aspx
Back to comp.databases.ms-sqlserver | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
Merge Replication DB backup/restore Jimbo <james.goodwill@googlemail.com> - 2011-09-19 04:18 -0700
Re: Merge Replication DB backup/restore Jimbo <james.goodwill@googlemail.com> - 2011-09-19 07:57 -0700
Re: Merge Replication DB backup/restore Erland Sommarskog <esquel@sommarskog.se> - 2011-09-19 22:52 +0200
csiph-web