Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.compilers > #3420
| From | anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.compilers |
| Subject | Re: Lisp syntax, was A simpler way to tokenize and parse? |
| Date | 2023-03-25 13:14 +0000 |
| Organization | Institut fuer Computersprachen, Technische Universitaet Wien |
| Message-ID | <23-03-018@comp.compilers> (permalink) |
| References | <23-03-011@comp.compilers> |
>[[...] The original plan was that Lisp 2 >would have M expressions that looked more like a normal language but >it's over 50 years later and they still haven't gotten around to it. >-John] Actually they have. Some HOPL paper (or several of them) discuss this: There were several attempts at an Algol-like syntax, but Lisp proprammers found that they preferred programming in S-Expressions over the Algol-like syntax, whether it's M-Expressions, Dylan syntax, or several other attempts. The only language which might be considered a success at having an Algol-like syntax in something similar to Lisp is JavaScript. Maybe this is just because JavaScript is far enough from Lisp not just in syntax, and there is no S-expression syntax for JavaScript, is there? - anton -- M. Anton Ertl anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/anton/
Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
A simpler way to tokenize and parse? Roger L Costello <costello@mitre.org> - 2023-03-24 14:45 +0000
Re: Lisp syntax, was A simpler way to tokenize and parse? Spiros Bousbouras <spibou@gmail.com> - 2023-03-25 11:55 +0000
Re: Lisp syntax, was A simpler way to tokenize and parse? gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> - 2023-03-25 14:32 -0700
Re: Lisp syntax, was A simpler way to tokenize and parse? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2023-03-25 13:14 +0000
Re: Lisp syntax, was A simpler way to tokenize and parse? Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2023-03-26 00:46 +0000
Re: A simpler way to tokenize and parse? Lieven Marchand <mal@wyrd.be> - 2023-03-25 19:58 +0100
Re: A simpler way to tokenize and parse? Spiros Bousbouras <spibou@gmail.com> - 2023-03-26 14:10 +0000
Re: A simpler way to tokenize and parse? Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2023-03-26 18:19 +0000
Re: Lisp syntax, A simpler way to tokenize and parse? Lieven Marchand <mal@wyrd.be> - 2023-03-27 23:15 +0200
Re: A simpler way to tokenize and parse? Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2023-03-26 01:17 +0000
csiph-web