Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.compilers > #3195
| From | Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.compilers |
| Subject | Re: Implementing built-in functions with LLVM, help needed |
| Date | 2022-10-07 20:59 +0200 |
| Organization | Compilers Central |
| Message-ID | <22-10-024@comp.compilers> (permalink) |
| References | <22-10-019@comp.compilers> <22-10-022@comp.compilers> |
On 10/7/22 7:56 AM, Christopher F Clark wrote: > Still, the ability to call functions is the key thing you need to do. And the compiler has to decide whether an argument type is okay, can be converted, or is incompatible with a function definition. So IMO handling of polymorphic and variadic functions is a matter of organisation of function argument types. DoDi
Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Implementing built-in functions with LLVM, help needed Ivan Espinosa <ivanmtze96@gmail.com> - 2022-10-03 15:13 -0700
Re: Implementing built-in functions with LLVM, help needed antispam@math.uni.wroc.pl - 2022-10-06 15:15 +0000
Implementing built-in functions with LLVM, help needed Christopher F Clark <christopher.f.clark@compiler-resources.com> - 2022-10-07 08:56 +0300
Re: Implementing built-in functions with LLVM, help needed Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net> - 2022-10-07 20:59 +0200
Re: Implementing built-in functions with LLVM, help needed antispam@math.uni.wroc.pl - 2022-10-13 14:08 +0000
csiph-web