Re: Wrestling with phase 1 of a C compiler

Path	csiph.com!1.us.feeder.erje.net!3.us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news.misty.com!news.iecc.com!.POSTED.news.iecc.com!nerds-end
From	luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.compilers
Subject	Re: Wrestling with phase 1 of a C compiler
Date	Fri, 9 Sep 2022 20:47:15 -0700 (PDT)
Organization	Compilers Central
Lines	11
Sender	news@iecc.com
Approved	comp.compilers@iecc.com
Message-ID	<22-09-002@comp.compilers> (permalink)
References	<22-09-001@comp.compilers>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Injection-Info	gal.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="72888"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com"
Keywords	parse, design, comment
Posted-Date	10 Sep 2022 14:36:54 EDT
X-submission-address	compilers@iecc.com
X-moderator-address	compilers-request@iecc.com
X-FAQ-and-archives	http://compilers.iecc.com
In-Reply-To	<22-09-001@comp.compilers>
Xref	csiph.com comp.compilers:3154

Show key headers only | View raw

On Wednesday, September 7, 2022 at 4:01:04 PM UTC-5, luser droog wrote:
> At my tedious glacial pace, I have rewritten my parser library
> for the umpteen-plus-one'th time only to stall out at an earlier
> step than where I stalled out the last time around.

Sorry for the noise. I'm prematurely optimizing, aren't I? The function
that works just fine and is already reasonably short and readable is
just fine for now. Folding and iotas will probably be a fun idea to try --
on the next rewrite. On to possibly important problems....
[It occurred to me that if you want to write in a functional language style,
doing it in C is really painful. -John]

Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Wrestling with phase 1 of a C compiler luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2022-09-07 09:47 -0700
  Re: Wrestling with phase 1 of a C compiler luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2022-09-09 20:47 -0700
    Re: Wrestling with phase 1 of a C compiler luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2022-09-11 20:15 -0700
  Wrestling with phase 1 of a C compiler Christopher F Clark <christopher.f.clark@compiler-resources.com> - 2022-09-12 21:45 +0300
    Re: Wrestling with phase 1 of a C compiler gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> - 2022-09-12 13:01 -0700
      Re: Wrestling with phase 1 of a C compiler Christopher F Clark <christopher.f.clark@compiler-resources.com> - 2022-09-13 14:55 +0300
        Re: Wrestling with phase 1 of a C compiler gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> - 2022-09-14 15:40 -0700
      Re: source languages, was Wrestling with phase 1 of a C compiler George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2022-09-14 16:03 -0400
    Re: Wrestling with phase 1 of a C compiler luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2022-09-14 14:31 -0700
      Re: Wrestling with phase 1 of a C compiler luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2022-09-15 20:11 -0700

csiph-web