Re: Programming language similarity

Path	csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!news.iecc.com!.POSTED.news.iecc.com!nerds-end
From	gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu>
Newsgroups	comp.compilers
Subject	Re: Programming language similarity
Date	Mon, 25 Apr 2022 14:58:12 -0700 (PDT)
Organization	Compilers Central
Lines	25
Sender	news@iecc.com
Approved	comp.compilers@iecc.com
Message-ID	<22-04-020@comp.compilers> (permalink)
References	<22-04-012@comp.compilers> <22-04-016@comp.compilers> <22-04-019@comp.compilers>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Injection-Info	gal.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="56753"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com"
Keywords	design, history
Posted-Date	25 Apr 2022 18:57:01 EDT
X-submission-address	compilers@iecc.com
X-moderator-address	compilers-request@iecc.com
X-FAQ-and-archives	http://compilers.iecc.com
In-Reply-To	<22-04-019@comp.compilers>
Xref	csiph.com comp.compilers:2986

Show key headers only | View raw

On Monday, April 25, 2022 at 1:54:58 PM UTC-7, Derek Jones wrote:

(snip)

> What makes somebody choose a particular set of symbols.
> My guess is that their past experience is a major factor,
> i.e., the use of symbols they had previously been exposed to.

Early Fortran was limited by the number of characters available
on the IBM 026 keypunch.  They redefined some of the punch
codes with different symbols for scientific use, as that was
easier than designing a whole new machine.

Much of that was then fixed with EBCDIC in S/360, where
an 8 bit code allowed, and pretty much required, that they be
separated. In any case, the characters (with new punches)
were kept.  (And new compilers have an option to accept
the old punch codes.)

I do remember punching ALGOL programs on the 026, where
you had to use the multipunch key, along with big charts on
the wall, to get the needed characters.

In any case, character set limitations stay with us long after
the reason for the limitation has gone.

Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Programming language similarity Derek Jones <derek@NOSPAM-knosof.co.uk> - 2022-04-25 00:00 +0100
  Re: Programming language similarity Derek Jones <derek@NOSPAM-knosof.co.uk> - 2022-04-25 08:59 +0100
  Re: Programming language similarity Fernando <pronesto@gmail.com> - 2022-04-25 04:24 -0700
    Re: Programming language similarity Derek Jones <derek@NOSPAM-knosof.co.uk> - 2022-04-25 19:35 +0100
  Re: Programming language similarity Jan Ziak <0xe2.0x9a.0x9b@gmail.com> - 2022-04-25 06:00 -0700
    Re: Programming language similarity Derek Jones <derek@NOSPAM-knosof.co.uk> - 2022-04-25 20:51 +0100
      Re: Programming language similarity gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> - 2022-04-25 14:58 -0700
        Re: Programming language similarity Derek Jones <derek@NOSPAM-knosof.co.uk> - 2022-04-26 00:50 +0100
  Re: Programming language similarity Meshach Mitchell <meshach.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2022-04-25 12:06 -0400

csiph-web