Re: Modern compilers for ye olde architectures

Path	csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!news.iecc.com!.POSTED.news.iecc.com!nerds-end
From	gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu>
Newsgroups	comp.compilers
Subject	Re: Modern compilers for ye olde architectures
Date	Thu, 21 Oct 2021 21:53:48 -0700 (PDT)
Organization	Compilers Central
Lines	24
Sender	news@iecc.com
Approved	comp.compilers@iecc.com
Message-ID	<21-10-037@comp.compilers> (permalink)
References	<21-10-007@comp.compilers> <21-10-012@comp.compilers> <21-10-015@comp.compilers> <21-10-024@comp.compilers> <21-10-034@comp.compilers>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Injection-Info	gal.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="30013"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com"
Keywords	history, Fortran, comment
Posted-Date	22 Oct 2021 12:19:42 EDT
X-submission-address	compilers@iecc.com
X-moderator-address	compilers-request@iecc.com
X-FAQ-and-archives	http://compilers.iecc.com
In-Reply-To	<21-10-034@comp.compilers>
Xref	csiph.com comp.compilers:2744

Show key headers only | View raw

On Thursday, October 21, 2021 at 5:08:46 PM UTC-7, Philipp Klaus Krause wrote:

(snip)

> On one hand, we have the theoretical bound on the number of assignments,
> which is useful for proving that we can be optimal in polynomial time.

> On the other hand, getting a provably optimal result when compiling an
> individual function is something that is easier to achieve, as the
> theoretical bound is a worst case.

This is reminding me that early Fortran compilers had a FREQUENCY statement
(optionally) telling the compiler the relative probability of branching for IF
statements, and the estimated iterations for DO loops.  It was removed before
the first standard in 1966.

The above methods might be fine on a small scale, but for more global
optimization you need the relative probabilities. I suspect that everyone
assumes equal probabilities for everything.

I suspect that there is no interest in bringing FREQUENCY back to Fortran,
or any other language, though.
[Legend says that in at least one compiler, FREQUENCY was implemented backward
and nobody noticed.  -John]

Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Modern compilers for ye olde architectures "Luke A. Guest" <laguest@archeia.com> - 2021-10-05 13:22 +0100
  Re: Modern compilers for ye olde architectures David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-10-05 19:59 +0200
  Re: Modern compilers for ye olde architectures Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net> - 2021-10-05 22:12 +0200
  Re: Modern compilers for ye olde architectures Derek Jones <derek@NOSPAM-knosof.co.uk> - 2021-10-06 01:26 +0100
    Re: Modern compilers for ye olde architectures "Luke A. Guest" <laguest@archeia.com> - 2021-10-06 09:00 +0100
  Re: Modern compilers for ye olde architectures anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2021-10-06 07:56 +0000
    Re: Modern compilers for ye olde architectures Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2021-10-06 18:20 +0200
      Re: Modern compilers for ye olde architectures anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2021-10-15 07:37 +0000
        Re: Modern compilers for ye olde architectures Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2021-10-18 08:35 +0200
        Re: Modern compilers for ye olde architectures Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2021-10-18 08:56 +0200
        Re: Modern compilers for ye olde architectures Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2021-10-18 09:17 +0200
          Re: Modern compilers for ye olde architectures gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> - 2021-10-21 21:53 -0700
            Re: Modern compilers for ye olde architectures Kaz Kylheku <480-992-1380@kylheku.com> - 2021-10-22 17:28 +0000
    Re: Modern compilers for ye olde architectures dave_thompson_2@comcast.net - 2021-11-14 15:04 -0500
  Re: Modern compilers for ye olde architectures Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2021-10-06 10:36 +0100
    Re: Modern compilers for ye olde architectures "Luke A. Guest" <laguest@archeia.com> - 2021-10-06 16:20 +0100

csiph-web