Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.compilers > #2636
| From | Rock Brentwood <rockbrentwood@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.compilers |
| Subject | Re: Supporting multiple input syntaxes |
| Date | 2021-03-14 17:36 -0700 |
| Organization | Compilers Central |
| Message-ID | <21-03-003@comp.compilers> (permalink) |
| References | <20-08-002@comp.compilers> |
On Wednesday, August 12, 2020 at 5:32:56 PM UTC-5, luser droog wrote: > I've got my project successfully parsing the circa-1975 C syntax > from that old manual. I'd like to add parsers for K&R1 and c90 > syntaxes. > > How separate should these be? Should they be complete > separate grammars, or more piecewise selection? I'm in a similar situation with a utility that I want to grandfather in the old syntax for, but write with a new and better syntax. My recommendation is this: stick to C99, since that's already in POSIX. Write a separate utility to convert legacy syntax to C99 (and to call out any irregularities/inconsistencies in the program being converted). That's, like, "lint" on steroids. The other syntaxes would be used in the other utilities, only - one per utility. It can also be hybridized with "indent" and a driver routine can control the conversion, so that all the conversion utilities can be combined to one. So, on input, the source syntax is selected, and on output the format is driven in much the same way that it is with indent. It's an excellent exercise in Text-To-AST-To-Text programming. Each program, upon upward conversion to C99, would replace the original, once it passes the consistency checks provided by the utility; so there isn't a question of cueing error messages to the format of the older program, because the older program would be replaced. Doing all of this is an example of "refactoring" used to pay off "code debt". And there's a lot of code debt out there that needs to be paid up. Technical Debt (Wikipedia): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technical_debt Code Refactoring (Wikipedia): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_refactoring
Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
Supporting multiple input syntaxes luser droog <mijoryx@yahoo.com.dmarc.email> - 2020-08-12 15:20 -0700
Re: Supporting multiple input syntaxes Kaz Kylheku <793-849-0957@kylheku.com> - 2020-08-13 00:43 +0000
Re: Supporting multiple input syntaxes Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net> - 2020-08-13 10:27 +0200
Re: Supporting multiple input syntaxes luser droog <mijoryx@yahoo.com.dmarc.email> - 2020-08-13 21:36 -0700
Re: Supporting multiple input syntaxes luser droog <mijoryx@yahoo.com.dmarc.email> - 2020-08-23 22:16 -0700
Re: Supporting multiple input syntaxes minforth@arcor.de - 2020-08-13 14:15 -0700
Re: Supporting multiple input syntaxes luser droog <mijoryx@yahoo.com.dmarc.email> - 2020-08-13 21:37 -0700
RE: Supporting mulitple input syntaxes Christopher F Clark <christopher.f.clark@compiler-resources.com> - 2020-08-14 12:44 +0300
Supporting multiple input syntaxes David Lovemore <davidlovemore@gmail.com> - 2020-08-15 06:42 -0700
Re: Supporting multiple input syntaxes luser droog <mijoryx@yahoo.com.dmarc.email> - 2020-08-15 15:20 -0700
Re: Supporting multiple input syntaxes David Lovemore <davidlovemore@gmail.com> - 2020-08-16 02:21 -0700
Re: Supporting multiple input syntaxes luser droog <mijoryx@yahoo.com.dmarc.email> - 2020-08-20 14:45 -0700
Re: Supporting multiple input syntaxes luser droog <mijoryx@yahoo.com.dmarc.email> - 2020-08-23 19:35 -0700
Re: implementation languages, was Supporting multiple input syntaxes luser droog <mijoryx@yahoo.com.dmarc.email> - 2020-08-23 20:39 -0700
Re: implementation languages, was Supporting multiple input syntaxes Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2020-08-24 17:01 +0000
Re: implementation languages, was Supporting multiple input syntaxes luser droog <mijoryx@yahoo.com.dmarc.email> - 2020-08-28 10:56 -0700
Re: stack languages, was Supporting multiple input syntaxes luser droog <mijoryx@yahoo.com.dmarc.email> - 2020-08-24 12:14 -0700
Re: Supporting multiple input syntaxes gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> - 2020-08-23 14:26 -0700
Re: Supporting multiple input syntaxes antispam@math.uni.wroc.pl - 2021-02-11 23:27 +0000
Re: Supporting multiple input syntaxes Elijah Stone <elronnd@elronnd.net> - 2021-02-17 01:44 -0800
Re: Supporting multiple input syntaxes antispam@math.uni.wroc.pl - 2021-02-23 23:28 +0000
Re: Supporting multiple input syntaxes "ltc...@gmail.com" <ltcmelo@gmail.com> - 2021-03-14 21:08 -0400
Re: Supporting multiple input syntaxes Rock Brentwood <rockbrentwood@gmail.com> - 2021-03-14 17:36 -0700
csiph-web