Re: Languages from the 1950s

Path	csiph.com!xmission!news.snarked.org!news.linkpendium.com!news.linkpendium.com!news.iecc.com!.POSTED.news.iecc.com!nerds-end
From	Martin Ward <martin@gkc.org.uk>
Newsgroups	comp.compilers
Subject	Re: Languages from the 1950s
Date	Wed, 13 May 2020 10:51:09 +0100
Organization	Compilers Central
Lines	20
Sender	news@iecc.com
Approved	comp.compilers@iecc.com
Message-ID	<20-05-005@comp.compilers> (permalink)
References	<20-03-030@comp.compilers> <20-05-003@comp.compilers>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
Injection-Info	gal.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="81263"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com"
Keywords	history, architecture, comment
Posted-Date	13 May 2020 11:06:30 EDT
X-submission-address	compilers@iecc.com
X-moderator-address	compilers-request@iecc.com
X-FAQ-and-archives	http://compilers.iecc.com
In-Reply-To	<20-05-003@comp.compilers>
Content-Language	en-GB
Xref	csiph.com comp.compilers:2518

Show key headers only | View raw

On 10/05/2020 01:46, John wrote:
> It was an "optimizing" assembler in that it tried to place
> instructions in locations on the 650's drum to minimize the
> rotational delay. -John

When I read this I thought "how quaint!". But then I remembered
that with modern heavily pipelined CPU's, compilers also need
to place instructions in the right order so that each instruction
in the sequence is executed just as the hardware components
that it needs become available, to minimise the pipeline delay.

Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.

--
			Martin

Dr Martin Ward | Email: martin@gkc.org.uk | http://www.gkc.org.uk
G.K.Chesterton site: http://www.gkc.org.uk/gkc | Erdos number: 4
[It's remarkable how little modern software technology wasn't already
done somewhere in the 1950s or 1960s.  -John]

Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Languages from the 1950s "Derek M. Jones" <derek@_NOSPAM_knosof.co.uk> - 2020-03-30 15:16 +0100
  Re: Languages from the 1950s anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2020-03-31 17:08 +0000
    Re: Languages from the 1950s "Derek M. Jones" <derek@_NOSPAM_knosof.co.uk> - 2020-03-31 19:27 +0100
  Re: Languages from the 1950s gah4@u.washington.edu - 2020-03-31 16:09 -0700
    Re: Languages from the 1950s "Robin Vowels" <robin51@dodo.com.au> - 2020-04-02 13:05 +1100
  Re: Languages from the 1950s "Robin Vowels" <robin51@dodo.com.au> - 2020-04-01 21:31 +1100
    Re: Languages from the 1950s "Derek M. Jones" <derek@_NOSPAM_knosof.co.uk> - 2020-04-01 17:35 +0100
  Re: Languages from the 1950s Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2020-04-01 17:49 +0200
  Re: Languages from the 1950s rst@panix.com (Robert Thau) - 2020-05-10 00:46 +0000
    Re: Languages from the 1950s Martin Ward <martin@gkc.org.uk> - 2020-05-13 10:51 +0100
  Re: Languages from the 1950s "Robin Vowels" <robin51@dodo.com.au> - 2020-09-03 21:02 +1000

csiph-web