Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.compilers > #2139
| From | Kaz Kylheku <157-073-9834@kylheku.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.compilers |
| Subject | Re: Compiler implementation language preference ? |
| Date | 2018-12-21 23:44 +0000 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <18-12-011@comp.compilers> (permalink) |
| References | <5e1b3cd8-ad2a-d8f0-ec00-ed0a507b62f5@gkc.org.uk> <18-12-009@comp.compilers> |
On 2018-12-20, Martin Ward <martin@gkc.org.uk> wrote: > On 19/12/18 19:54, Aaron Gray wrote: >> Pity there are no real compiler-compilers anymore, hint-hint, I am >> working on one to rule them all ;) >> >> [Please don't say you've invented another UNCOL. -John] > > I may be wrong but read Aaron's message to mean that he is > working on a domain specific language for writing compilers, > in the style of Language Oriented Programming, > rather than a universal intermediate program representation language, > which is what UNCOL attempted to be. > > The original paper on Language Oriented Programming: > > http://www.gkc.org.uk/martin/papers/middle-out-t.pdf From that: >> "In the case of the FermaT tool, the lowest level translator and >> support library consists of 2–3,000 lines of LISP code. This >> translates from low-level META WSL to LISP, all the rest of the system >> is written in META WSL. To port the system to a new version of LISP, or >> even to a new base language such as C, only requires rewriting the >> lowest level translator: and this is a comparatively small task–in fact, >> the first version of the translator was wr itten in less than three man >> days. The FermaT system is currently being ported from a Unix environm >> ent to a PC environment, using C rather than LISP as the implementation >> language." That language hopping aspect reminds me of MAL (Make A Lisp): a project which bootstraps the same Lisp dialect (its own) in numerous different languages (currently 74): https://github.com/kanaka/mal
Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
Re: Compiler implementation language preference ? Martin Ward <martin@gkc.org.uk> - 2018-12-20 18:51 +0000 Re: Compiler implementation language preference ? Kaz Kylheku <157-073-9834@kylheku.com> - 2018-12-21 23:44 +0000
csiph-web