Re: Compiler implementation language preference ?

Path	csiph.com!xmission!news.snarked.org!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.iecc.com!.POSTED.news.iecc.com!nerds-end
From	steve kargl <sgk@REMOVEtroutmask.apl.washington.edu>
Newsgroups	comp.compilers
Subject	Re: Compiler implementation language preference ?
Date	Wed, 19 Dec 2018 23:19:04 -0000 (UTC)
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Lines	17
Sender	news@iecc.com
Approved	comp.compilers@iecc.com
Message-ID	<18-12-008@comp.compilers> (permalink)
References	<18-05-009@comp.compilers> <18-12-007@comp.compilers>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
Injection-Info	gal.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="74762"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com"
Keywords	Fortran, history, comment
Posted-Date	19 Dec 2018 20:15:51 EST
X-submission-address	compilers@iecc.com
X-moderator-address	compilers-request@iecc.com
X-FAQ-and-archives	http://compilers.iecc.com
Xref	csiph.com comp.compilers:2136

Show key headers only | View raw

Aaron Gray wrote:
> On Tuesday, 22 May 2018 18:39:07 UTC+1, Michael Justice  wrote:
>> Is there any preference to writing a compiler in say c instead of say
>> java, fortran, basic etc? ...
>
>> [Mostly people use what they're used to, or in languages that are easy
>> to bootstrap on the machines they want to use.  IBM's Fortran H
>> compiler was famously written in itself, but I wouldn't write a new
>> compiler in Fortran because it doesn't have great data structuring or
>> dynamic storage management.  (Yes, I know that Fortran 2008 is a lot
>> different from Fortran 66.) -John]

The latest Fortran standard is informally referred to as F2018.
It became the official standard a week or so ago.
https://wg5-fortran.org/f2018.html
[You're right, but I still wouldn't want to write a compiler in it.  That's
not what it's for.  -John]

Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Compiler implementation language preference ? Michael Justice <nullcompiler@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 04:58 -0400
  Re: Compiler implementation language preference ? w.clodius@icloud.com (William Clodius) - 2018-05-23 10:14 -0600
  Re: Compiler implementation language preference ? Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-06-07 12:58 -0400
  Re: Compiler implementation language preference ? rockbrentwood@gmail.com - 2018-11-09 14:29 -0800
    Re: Compiler implementation language preference ? Kaz Kylheku <157-073-9834@kylheku.com> - 2018-11-10 04:00 +0000
    Re: Compiler implementation language preference ? Kaz Kylheku <157-073-9834@kylheku.com> - 2018-11-10 04:20 +0000
    Re: Compiler implementation language preference ? Richard <portempa@aon.at> - 2018-11-10 15:06 +0100
    Re: Compiler implementation language preference ? Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-11-10 21:46 -0500
  Re: Compiler implementation language preference ? Nick <ibeam2000@gmail.com> - 2018-11-13 02:14 -0800
  Re: Compiler implementation language preference ? Aaron Gray <aaronngray@gmail.com> - 2018-12-19 11:54 -0800
    Re: Compiler implementation language preference ? steve kargl <sgk@REMOVEtroutmask.apl.washington.edu> - 2018-12-19 23:19 +0000
    Re: Compiler implementation language preference ? Aaron Gray <aaronngray@gmail.com> - 2018-12-21 04:17 -0800

csiph-web