Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.compilers > #2073
| Path | csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.iecc.com!.POSTED.news.iecc.com!nerds-end |
|---|---|
| From | Martin Ward <martin@gkc.org.uk> |
| Newsgroups | comp.compilers |
| Subject | Re: Language standards vs. implementation, was Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format |
| Date | Fri, 13 Apr 2018 13:35:44 +0100 |
| Organization | Compilers Central |
| Lines | 11 |
| Sender | news@iecc.com |
| Approved | comp.compilers@iecc.com |
| Message-ID | <18-04-058@comp.compilers> (permalink) |
| References | <f8bab084-a25a-3279-cb81-a233a3fb420d@gkc.org.uk> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| Injection-Info | gal.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="99563"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com" |
| Keywords | C |
| Posted-Date | 13 Apr 2018 13:18:40 EDT |
| X-submission-address | compilers@iecc.com |
| X-moderator-address | compilers-request@iecc.com |
| X-FAQ-and-archives | http://compilers.iecc.com |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.compilers:2073 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 12/04/18 12:15, bartc wrote: > I'm not saying it's not practical with C, but the language makes it harder. I think you just summed up C in a single sentence! Congratulations :-) -- Martin Dr Martin Ward | Email: martin@gkc.org.uk | http://www.gkc.org.uk G.K.Chesterton site: http://www.gkc.org.uk/gkc | Erdos number: 4
Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next | Find similar
Re: Language standards vs. implementation, was Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Martin Ward <martin@gkc.org.uk> - 2018-04-13 13:35 +0100
csiph-web