Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.compilers > #2061

Unum numbers

Path csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.iecc.com!.POSTED.news.iecc.com!nerds-end
From Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net>
Newsgroups comp.compilers
Subject Unum numbers
Date Thu, 12 Apr 2018 10:29:21 +0200
Organization Compilers Central
Lines 9
Sender news@iecc.com
Approved comp.compilers@iecc.com
Message-ID <18-04-043@comp.compilers> (permalink)
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
Injection-Info gal.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="37576"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com"
Keywords arithmetic, question
Posted-Date 12 Apr 2018 11:14:55 EDT
X-submission-address compilers@iecc.com
X-moderator-address compilers-request@iecc.com
X-FAQ-and-archives http://compilers.iecc.com
Xref csiph.com comp.compilers:2061

Show key headers only | View raw


A friend just pointed me to the Universal Number formats, which may have
been subject to the IEEE 754 thread. Before I tweet my own thoughts
here, I'd like to hear more about the practice of Unum numbers. From
theory the Unum formats try to increase the number precision (around
1.0) and range (towards 0 and Inf). What are these attempts worth in
real life?

DoDi

Back to comp.compilers | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar


Thread

Unum numbers Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net> - 2018-04-12 10:29 +0200
  Re: Unum numbers Joshua Cranmer 🐧 <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2018-04-12 23:13 -0400
    Re: Unum numbers Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net> - 2018-04-18 10:50 +0200

csiph-web