Re: Parser generator

From	arnold@skeeve.com (Aharon Robbins)
Newsgroups	comp.compilers
Subject	Re: Parser generator
Date	Wed, 11 Jan 2012 20:06:55 +0000 (UTC)
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Lines	25
Sender	news@iecc.com
Approved	comp.compilers@iecc.com
Message-ID	<12-01-013@comp.compilers> (permalink)
References	<12-01-009@comp.compilers> <12-01-010@comp.compilers>
NNTP-Posting-Host	news.iecc.com
X-Trace	leila.iecc.com 1326316236 80987 64.57.183.58 (11 Jan 2012 21:10:36 GMT)
X-Complaints-To	abuse@iecc.com
NNTP-Posting-Date	Wed, 11 Jan 2012 21:10:36 +0000 (UTC)
Keywords	parse, PL/I, comment
Posted-Date	11 Jan 2012 16:10:36 EST
X-submission-address	compilers@iecc.com
X-moderator-address	compilers-request@iecc.com
X-FAQ-and-archives	http://compilers.iecc.com
Path	csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.chainon-marquant.org!feed.ac-versailles.fr!fdn.fr!usenet-fr.net!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!news.bbs-scene.org!border4.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.iecc.com!nerds-end
Xref	x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.compilers:412

Show key headers only | View raw

glen herrmannsfeldt  <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> wrote:
>Dennis Boone <drb@msu.edu> wrote:
>One reason that I learned C was that none of the computers I was using
>at the time had PL/I compilers. PL/I was much more fun to write than
>Fortran 66 or even Fortran 77.

Are there PL/I compilers available for modern platforms? E.g. Windows,
Linux 32 and 64 bit Intel, sparc, power pc, etc....  (I see there was
a start at one for GCC.)

Is there a reason to prefer PL/I over C++ or Java?

Just wondering.

Thanks,

Arnold
--
Aharon (Arnold) Robbins 			arnold AT skeeve DOT com
P.O. Box 354		Home Phone: +972  8 979-0381
Nof Ayalon		Cell Phone: +972 50 729-7545
D.N. Shimshon 99785	ISRAEL
[Yes, there's PL/I for a surprising array of computers.  If you're doing a
lot of formatted I/O it's a considerable improvement over its
successors. -John]

Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Parser generator drb@msu.edu (Dennis Boone) - 2012-01-08 11:47 -0600
  Re: Parser generator glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2012-01-08 21:58 +0000
    Re: Parser generator arnold@skeeve.com (Aharon Robbins) - 2012-01-11 20:06 +0000
      Re: PL/I, was Parser generator drb@ihatespam.msu.edu (Dennis Boone) - 2012-01-11 16:19 -0600
      Re: PL/I, was Parser generator Robert AH Prins <robert@prino.org> - 2012-01-11 23:42 +0000
      Re: programming in PL/I compilers@is-not-my.name - 2012-01-12 16:30 +0000
        Re: programming in PL/I Robert AH Prins <robert@prino.org> - 2012-01-14 09:20 +0000
        Re: programming in PL/I "Derek M. Jones" <derek@_NOSPAM_knosof.co.uk> - 2012-01-14 14:08 +0000
          Re: programming in PL/I glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2012-01-15 01:01 +0000
            Re: programming in PL/I glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2012-01-15 11:36 +0000
    Re: Parser generator for PL/I "robin" <robin51@dodo.com.au> - 2012-01-15 02:00 +1100
      Re: Parser generator for PL/I drb@ihatespam.msu.edu (Dennis Boone) - 2012-01-14 23:40 -0600
  Re: Parser generator SLK Systems <slkpg3@gmail.com> - 2012-01-08 20:26 -0500
    Re: Parser generator glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2012-01-11 07:22 +0000
      Re: Parser generator SLK Systems <slkpg3@gmail.com> - 2012-01-11 20:28 -0500

csiph-web