Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.compilers > #386
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.glorb.com!postnews.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.iecc.com!nerds-end |
|---|---|
| From | Gene <gene.ressler@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.compilers |
| Subject | Re: How detect cycle in grammar ? |
| Date | Wed, 7 Dec 2011 06:29:33 -0800 (PST) |
| Organization | Compilers Central |
| Lines | 23 |
| Sender | news@iecc.com |
| Approved | comp.compilers@iecc.com |
| Message-ID | <11-12-014@comp.compilers> (permalink) |
| References | <11-11-041@comp.compilers> <11-11-045@comp.compilers> <11-11-050@comp.compilers> <11-11-057@comp.compilers> <11-11-066@comp.compilers> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | news.iecc.com |
| X-Trace | leila.iecc.com 1323609025 76560 64.57.183.58 (11 Dec 2011 13:10:25 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@iecc.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Sun, 11 Dec 2011 13:10:25 +0000 (UTC) |
| Keywords | parse, theory |
| Posted-Date | 11 Dec 2011 08:10:25 EST |
| X-submission-address | compilers@iecc.com |
| X-moderator-address | compilers-request@iecc.com |
| X-FAQ-and-archives | http://compilers.iecc.com |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.compilers:386 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Nov 28, 11:46 am, an...@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) wrote: > Gene <gene.ress...@gmail.com> writes: > >It's also worth noting that any grammar with A->A in it is ambiguous > >in a way that should cause LR table generation to fail. How would a > >parser know how many times to reduce A->A? > > S -> A|B > A -> A > B -> t > > This grammar can derive only the word "t", and only in one way. I see > no ambiguity; no word can be derived in two ways in this grammar. > > As for warning about these useless cycles, sure, they may indicate a > programming mistake, so better warn about them. I still don't see > that they are a problem as far as their meaning is concerned, nor > wrt. implementability in general. Apparently the Bison implementors > thought so, too, or Bison would produce an error, not a warning. We are really down in the weeds. I should have said any reduced grammar (with useless non-terminals already removed).
Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
How detect cycle in grammar ? Borneq <a.moderacja@gmail.com> - 2011-11-20 08:48 -0800
Re: How detect cycle in grammar ? Hans Aberg <haberg-news@telia.com> - 2011-11-21 18:14 +0100
Re: How detect cycle in grammar ? Gene <gene.ressler@gmail.com> - 2011-11-21 10:20 -0800
Re: How detect cycle in grammar ? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2011-11-22 15:20 +0000
Re: How detect cycle in grammar ? Quinn Tyler Jackson <quinn_jackson2004@yahoo.ca> - 2011-11-25 22:28 -0800
Re: How detect cycle in grammar ? Gene <gene.ressler@gmail.com> - 2011-11-27 10:18 -0800
Re: How detect cycle in grammar ? Borneq <a.moderacja@gmail.com> - 2011-11-23 12:56 -0800
Re: How detect cycle in grammar ? Borneq <a.moderacja@gmail.com> - 2011-11-24 09:24 -0800
Re: How detect cycle in grammar ? Gene <gene.ressler@gmail.com> - 2011-11-27 10:27 -0800
Re: How detect cycle in grammar ? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2011-11-28 16:46 +0000
Re: How detect cycle in grammar ? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2011-11-29 07:31 +0000
Re: How detect cycle in grammar ? Paul B Mann <paul@paulbmann.com> - 2011-12-01 02:46 -0800
Re: How detect cycle in grammar ? Quinn Tyler Jackson <quinn_jackson2004@yahoo.ca> - 2011-12-02 09:20 -0800
Re: How detect cycle in grammar ? Gene <gene.ressler@gmail.com> - 2011-12-07 06:29 -0800
csiph-web