Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.compilers > #305
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.glorb.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.iecc.com!lnews.iecc.com!nerds-end |
|---|---|
| From | Hans Aberg <haberg-news@telia.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.compilers |
| Subject | Re: bison c-parse.y:1115.19-20: $$ for the midrule at $4 of `structsp' has no declared type |
| Date | Mon, 31 Oct 2011 20:49:28 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 23 |
| Sender | news@iecc.com |
| Approved | comp.compilers@iecc.com |
| Message-ID | <11-11-003@comp.compilers> (permalink) |
| References | <11-10-020@comp.compilers> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | lnews.iecc.com |
| X-Trace | gal.iecc.com 1320177624 30567 64.57.183.34 (1 Nov 2011 20:00:24 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@iecc.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Tue, 1 Nov 2011 20:00:24 +0000 (UTC) |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.compilers:305 |
| Keywords | bison |
| Posted-Date | 01 Nov 2011 16:00:24 EDT |
| X-submission-address | compilers@iecc.com |
| X-moderator-address | compilers-request@iecc.com |
| X-FAQ-and-archives | http://compilers.iecc.com |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 2011/10/31 14:15, Alessandro Basili wrote: > ... then I got the following message: > >> cd .; bison -v -d c-parse.y -o c-parse.c >> c-parse.y: conflicts: 10 shift/reduce >> c-parse.y: expected 8 shift/reduce conflicts > > I believe I'm in the dark here. Usually, it means that one has to get hold of the authors of the package, to find out what they had in mind: One can deliberately leave shift/reduce conflicts, in which case Bison will issue a warning, which can be suppressed %expect (see section 3.7.8 "Suppressing Conflict Warnings" in the Bison manual). However, there is no way to be sure of that. Especially when it say expected 8, and you got 10. But the compile and parser will run. Hans [I made the obvious patches and also got 10 rather than 8. I agree, give this decade-old code a try and see if it works. -John]
Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
bison c-parse.y:1115.19-20: $$ for the midrule at $4 of `structsp' has no declared type Alessandro Basili <alessandro.basili@cern.ch> - 2011-10-31 14:15 +0100
Re: bison c-parse.y:1115.19-20: $$ for the midrule at $4 of `structsp' has no declared type Hans Aberg <haberg-news@telia.com> - 2011-10-31 20:49 +0100
Re: bison c-parse.y:1115.19-20: $$ for the midrule at $4 of `structsp' has no declared type Alessandro Basili <alessandro.basili@cern.ch> - 2011-11-02 09:45 +0100
Re: bison c-parse.y:1115.19-20: $$ for the midrule at $4 of `structsp' has no declared type George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2011-11-02 12:33 -0400
Re: bison c-parse.y:1115.19-20: $$ for the midrule at $4 of `structsp' has no declared type George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2011-11-04 12:56 -0400
Re: bison c-parse.y:1115.19-20: $$ for the midrule at $4 of `structsp' has no declared type Alessandro Basili <alessandro.basili@cern.ch> - 2011-11-06 19:24 +0100
Re: bison c-parse.y:1115.19-20: $$ for the midrule at $4 of `structsp' has no declared type glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2011-11-07 05:08 +0000
Re: bison c-parse.y:1115.19-20: $$ for the midrule at $4 of `structsp' has no declared type George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2011-11-07 03:18 -0500
csiph-web