Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.compilers > #287
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border4.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.iecc.com!lnews.iecc.com!nerds-end |
|---|---|
| From | "Armel" <armelasselin@hotmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.compilers |
| Subject | Re: coupling LALR with a scanner? |
| Date | Sun, 2 Oct 2011 16:41:08 +0200 |
| Organization | les newsgroups par Orange |
| Lines | 17 |
| Sender | news@iecc.com |
| Approved | comp.compilers@iecc.com |
| Message-ID | <11-10-005@comp.compilers> (permalink) |
| References | <11-07-013@comp.compilers> <11-07-015@comp.compilers> <11-07-018@comp.compilers> <11-08-004@comp.compilers> <11-09-016@comp.compilers> <11-09-017@comp.compilers> <11-09-022@comp.compilers> <11-09-023@comp.compilers> <11-10-003@comp.compilers> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | lnews.iecc.com |
| X-Trace | gal.iecc.com 1317610133 54156 64.57.183.34 (3 Oct 2011 02:48:53 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@iecc.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Mon, 3 Oct 2011 02:48:53 +0000 (UTC) |
| Keywords | parse |
| Posted-Date | 02 Oct 2011 22:48:53 EDT |
| X-submission-address | compilers@iecc.com |
| X-moderator-address | compilers-request@iecc.com |
| X-FAQ-and-archives | http://compilers.iecc.com |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.compilers:287 |
Show key headers only | View raw
> there is an argument for introducing such a gap to "segment" > tokens into smaller chunks for both performance and expressibility > reasons. could you elaborate on this segmentation mechanism? In my lexer generator, the developer can introduce start states by himself and 'cut' complex expressions into smaller expressions which still respect AFD capabilities and introduce dynamic regular expressions where absolutely necessary, for languages allowing dynamic string delimiters for example (e.g. doc-strings like << END_OF_STR_MARKER, some lines then a line with END_OF_STR_MARKER only on the line), languages such as ruby are very funny from that point of view if I remember well. Regards Armel
Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
coupling LALR with a scanner? "Armel" <armelasselin@hotmail.com> - 2011-07-05 01:02 +0200
Re: coupling LALR with a scanner? "Armel" <armelasselin@hotmail.com> - 2011-07-07 10:28 +0200
coupling LALR with a scanner? "Karsten Nyblad" <uu3kw29sb7@snkmail.com> - 2011-07-07 10:46 +0200
Re: coupling LALR with a scanner? "Karsten Nyblad" <uu3kw29sb7@snkmail.com> - 2011-07-08 14:39 +0200
Re: coupling LALR with a scanner? "Armel" <armelasselin@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-04 11:17 +0200
Re: coupling LALR with a scanner? Paul B Mann <paul@paulbmann.com> - 2011-09-13 13:38 -0700
Re: coupling LALR with a scanner? "Armel" <armelasselin@hotmail.com> - 2011-09-16 10:47 +0200
Re: coupling LALR with a scanner? "Armel" <armelasselin@hotmail.com> - 2011-09-19 13:52 +0200
Re: coupling LALR with a scanner? Paul B Mann <paul@paulbmann.com> - 2011-09-19 12:12 -0700
Re: coupling LALR with a scanner? "Armel" <armelasselin@hotmail.com> - 2011-09-20 09:40 +0200
Re: coupling LALR with a scanner? Chris Dodd <cdodd@acm.org> - 2011-09-23 23:59 +0100
Re: coupling LALR with a scanner? Chris F Clark <cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com> - 2011-09-29 00:00 -0400
Re: coupling LALR with a scanner? "Armel" <armelasselin@hotmail.com> - 2011-10-02 16:41 +0200
Re: coupling LALR with a scanner? Chris F Clark <cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com> - 2011-10-03 11:59 -0400
Re: coupling LALR with a scanner? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2011-10-03 21:08 +0000
Re: coupling LALR with a scanner? Paul B Mann <paul@paulbmann.com> - 2011-09-17 10:38 -0700
csiph-web