Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > comp.compilers > #288
| From | Chris F Clark <cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.compilers |
| Subject | Re: coupling LALR with a scanner? |
| Date | 2011-10-03 11:59 -0400 |
| Organization | The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA |
| Message-ID | <11-10-006@comp.compilers> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <11-09-017@comp.compilers> <11-09-022@comp.compilers> <11-09-023@comp.compilers> <11-10-003@comp.compilers> <11-10-005@comp.compilers> |
"Armel" <armelasselin@hotmail.com> writes: >> there is an argument for introducing such a gap to "segment" >> tokens into smaller chunks for both performance and expressibility >> reasons. > > could you elaborate on this segmentation mechanism? I would like to, but the idea is going through the patent process, as it has hardware design implications. Once I know that the patent has been filed, or get other ok from Intel legal, I will write the idea up. > In my lexer generator, the developer can introduce start states by himself > and 'cut' complex expressions into smaller expressions which still respect > AFD capabilities and introduce dynamic regular expressions where absolutely > necessary, for languages allowing dynamic string delimiters for example > (e.g. doc-strings like << END_OF_STR_MARKER, some lines then a line with > END_OF_STR_MARKER only on the line), languages such as ruby are very funny > from that point of view if I remember well. Those sound like useful extensions. In the hands of an experienced parser writer, that could make the process much easier. Let the system figure out what it can, then adjust where you must.
Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
coupling LALR with a scanner? "Armel" <armelasselin@hotmail.com> - 2011-07-05 01:02 +0200
Re: coupling LALR with a scanner? "Armel" <armelasselin@hotmail.com> - 2011-07-07 10:28 +0200
coupling LALR with a scanner? "Karsten Nyblad" <uu3kw29sb7@snkmail.com> - 2011-07-07 10:46 +0200
Re: coupling LALR with a scanner? "Karsten Nyblad" <uu3kw29sb7@snkmail.com> - 2011-07-08 14:39 +0200
Re: coupling LALR with a scanner? "Armel" <armelasselin@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-04 11:17 +0200
Re: coupling LALR with a scanner? Paul B Mann <paul@paulbmann.com> - 2011-09-13 13:38 -0700
Re: coupling LALR with a scanner? "Armel" <armelasselin@hotmail.com> - 2011-09-16 10:47 +0200
Re: coupling LALR with a scanner? "Armel" <armelasselin@hotmail.com> - 2011-09-19 13:52 +0200
Re: coupling LALR with a scanner? Paul B Mann <paul@paulbmann.com> - 2011-09-19 12:12 -0700
Re: coupling LALR with a scanner? "Armel" <armelasselin@hotmail.com> - 2011-09-20 09:40 +0200
Re: coupling LALR with a scanner? Chris Dodd <cdodd@acm.org> - 2011-09-23 23:59 +0100
Re: coupling LALR with a scanner? Chris F Clark <cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com> - 2011-09-29 00:00 -0400
Re: coupling LALR with a scanner? "Armel" <armelasselin@hotmail.com> - 2011-10-02 16:41 +0200
Re: coupling LALR with a scanner? Chris F Clark <cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com> - 2011-10-03 11:59 -0400
Re: coupling LALR with a scanner? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2011-10-03 21:08 +0000
Re: coupling LALR with a scanner? Paul B Mann <paul@paulbmann.com> - 2011-09-17 10:38 -0700
csiph-web