Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register


Groups > comp.compilers > #207

Re: Language Design

Path csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!news.linkpendium.com!news.linkpendium.com!news.iecc.com!nerds-end
From anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl)
Newsgroups comp.compilers
Subject Re: Language Design
Date Tue, 19 Jul 2011 13:12:39 GMT
Organization Institut fuer Computersprachen, Technische Universitaet Wien
Lines 18
Sender news@iecc.com
Approved comp.compilers@iecc.com
Message-ID <11-07-031@comp.compilers> (permalink)
References <11-07-027@comp.compilers>
NNTP-Posting-Host news.iecc.com
X-Trace gal.iecc.com 1311403095 67596 64.57.183.58 (23 Jul 2011 06:38:15 GMT)
X-Complaints-To abuse@iecc.com
NNTP-Posting-Date Sat, 23 Jul 2011 06:38:15 +0000 (UTC)
Keywords design
Posted-Date 23 Jul 2011 02:38:15 EDT
X-submission-address compilers@iecc.com
X-moderator-address compilers-request@iecc.com
X-FAQ-and-archives http://compilers.iecc.com
Xref x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.compilers:207

Show key headers only | View raw


Billy Mays <81282ed9a88799d21e77957df2d84bd6514d9af6@myhashismyemail.com> writes:
>I am trying to design a programming language for a simple processor
>(16 bit, ~10 instructions, 16 registers).  I am not sure what a
>language actually needs in order to be more useful than pure assembly,
>but is also reasonable to implement.
>
>I had originally tried to make a RPN style language where the language
>is purely stack based, but I realized it wouldn't be Turing complete.

Why not.  Anyway, you can implement Forth or something similar, which
is Turing-complete and relatively easy to implement.

- anton
--
M. Anton Ertl
anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at
http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/anton/

Back to comp.compilers | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Language Design Billy Mays <81282ed9a88799d21e77957df2d84bd6514d9af6@myhashismyemail.com> - 2011-07-18 16:16 -0400
  Re: Language Design Roberto Waltman <usenet@rwaltman.com> - 2011-07-18 18:10 -0400
  Re: Language Design Srinivas Nayak <sinu.nayak2001@gmail.com> - 2011-07-18 22:54 -0700
  Re: Language Design anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2011-07-19 13:12 +0000
  Re: Language Design Andreas Zwinkau <zwinkau@kit.edu> - 2011-07-20 13:26 +0200
  Re: Language Design mac <acolvin@efunct.com> - 2011-07-23 01:11 +0000
  Re: Language Design Christophe de Dinechin <christophe.de.dinechin@gmail.com> - 2011-07-23 08:17 -0700
  Re: Language Design Oleg Sesov <osesov@gmail.com> - 2011-07-23 14:58 -0700
  Re: Language Design Gene <gene.ressler@gmail.com> - 2011-07-26 10:28 -0700
    Re: Language Design Roberto Waltman <usenet@rwaltman.com> - 2011-07-28 13:22 -0400
    Re: Language Design torbenm@diku.dk (Torben Ægidius Mogensen) - 2011-08-08 16:11 +0200
  Re: Language Design tm <thomas.mertes@gmx.at> - 2011-07-27 08:11 -0700
  Re: Language Design "s_dubrovich@yahoo.com" <s_dubrovich@yahoo.com> - 2011-08-04 18:43 -0700
  Re: Language Design for a tiny processor "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-08-08 22:54 +0100

csiph-web