Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.compilers > #208
| From | Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.arch, comp.compilers, alt.folklore.computers |
| Subject | Re: Architecture / Instruction Set / Language co-design. |
| Date | 2011-07-19 16:16 -0700 |
| Organization | Compilers Central |
| Message-ID | <11-07-032@comp.compilers> (permalink) |
| References | <vbhu17tqe8f03a9i8tar3kpoirg02l8iuj@4ax.com> <989ajaF4u9U1@mid.individual.net> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On Jul 15, 1:57 am, Andrew Reilly <areilly...@bigpond.net.au> wrote: > On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 15:37:53 -0400, Roberto Waltman wrote: > > Recently I've become (very) interested in Wirth's Lilith/Modula-2 > > workstation, which leads me to ask: > > > What other systems were developed in a similar fashion? > > > That is, to support mainly one language with the language guiding the > > architectural design. > > Bit of a stretch, perhaps: the AS-400 series of minis vs ?Cobol? ?PL/1? > RPG. Never touched AS/400 myself. From what I heard from friends back in early 90s, RPG was considered the HLL of choice on this machines.
Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next | Find similar
Re: Architecture / Instruction Set / Language co-design. Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2011-07-19 16:16 -0700
csiph-web