Re: coupling LALR with a scanner?

Path	csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!news.glorb.com!news-out.readnews.com!news-xxxfer.readnews.com!news.misty.com!news.iecc.com!nerds-end
From	"Armel" <armelasselin@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.compilers
Subject	Re: coupling LALR with a scanner?
Date	Thu, 7 Jul 2011 10:28:46 +0200
Organization	les newsgroups par Orange
Lines	17
Sender	news@iecc.com
Approved	comp.compilers@iecc.com
Message-ID	<11-07-015@comp.compilers> (permalink)
References	<11-07-013@comp.compilers>
NNTP-Posting-Host	news.iecc.com
X-Trace	gal.iecc.com 1310060793 52665 64.57.183.58 (7 Jul 2011 17:46:33 GMT)
X-Complaints-To	abuse@iecc.com
NNTP-Posting-Date	Thu, 7 Jul 2011 17:46:33 +0000 (UTC)
Keywords	parse, lex
Posted-Date	07 Jul 2011 13:46:33 EDT
X-submission-address	compilers@iecc.com
X-moderator-address	compilers-request@iecc.com
X-FAQ-and-archives	http://compilers.iecc.com
Xref	x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.compilers:191

Show key headers only | View raw

>[The usual approach is to set flex start states in your yacc or bison
>parser. >-John]

the LALR generator is one of mine and the idea here would be to select
automatically the right lexer from the currently accepted tokens. I have the
feeling that it must be doable. The target is to be able to write grammars
with such dependencies naturally without any (user level) grammar actions
and very minimal lexer meta-information (such as which lexer produces which
tokens).

Armel
[I think you will find that users hate a compiler where in each state the
lexer only recognizes the tokens valid in that state, since the only error
message it could produce is "invalid token."  Also remember that the LA in
LALR stands for Look Ahead, and the lexer is often one token ahead of the
parser. -John]

Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

coupling LALR with a scanner? "Armel" <armelasselin@hotmail.com> - 2011-07-05 01:02 +0200
  Re: coupling LALR with a scanner? "Armel" <armelasselin@hotmail.com> - 2011-07-07 10:28 +0200
    coupling LALR with a scanner? "Karsten Nyblad" <uu3kw29sb7@snkmail.com> - 2011-07-07 10:46 +0200
    Re: coupling LALR with a scanner? "Karsten Nyblad" <uu3kw29sb7@snkmail.com> - 2011-07-08 14:39 +0200
      Re: coupling LALR with a scanner? "Armel" <armelasselin@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-04 11:17 +0200
        Re: coupling LALR with a scanner? Paul B Mann <paul@paulbmann.com> - 2011-09-13 13:38 -0700
          Re: coupling LALR with a scanner? "Armel" <armelasselin@hotmail.com> - 2011-09-16 10:47 +0200
            Re: coupling LALR with a scanner? "Armel" <armelasselin@hotmail.com> - 2011-09-19 13:52 +0200
            Re: coupling LALR with a scanner? Paul B Mann <paul@paulbmann.com> - 2011-09-19 12:12 -0700
              Re: coupling LALR with a scanner? "Armel" <armelasselin@hotmail.com> - 2011-09-20 09:40 +0200
                Re: coupling LALR with a scanner? Chris Dodd <cdodd@acm.org> - 2011-09-23 23:59 +0100
                Re: coupling LALR with a scanner? Chris F Clark <cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com> - 2011-09-29 00:00 -0400
                Re: coupling LALR with a scanner? "Armel" <armelasselin@hotmail.com> - 2011-10-02 16:41 +0200
                Re: coupling LALR with a scanner? Chris F Clark <cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com> - 2011-10-03 11:59 -0400
                Re: coupling LALR with a scanner? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2011-10-03 21:08 +0000
          Re: coupling LALR with a scanner? Paul B Mann <paul@paulbmann.com> - 2011-09-17 10:38 -0700

csiph-web