Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.arch > #111650 > unrolled thread
| Started by | quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2025-05-19 19:15 +0000 |
| Last post | 2025-06-19 01:03 +0000 |
| Articles |
20 on this page of 1000+
— 49 participants
Thread has 1028 articles; only the first 1000 are indexed. |
Back to article view | Back to comp.arch | Browse in flat view
Thread has 1028 articles; showing the first 1000 in depth-first order. Use the flat group view to see the rest.
Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-05-19 19:15 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-05-19 21:26 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-05-21 15:07 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In David Chmelik <dchmelik@gmail.com> - 2025-05-22 06:51 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-05-22 17:42 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-05-22 18:03 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-05-23 12:37 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-05-23 13:24 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In John Savard <quadibloc@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-26 05:57 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In John Savard <quadibloc@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-26 06:14 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-10 21:45 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2025-06-10 22:45 -0500
Re: Why I've Dropped In John Savard <quadibloc@invalid.invalid> - 2025-08-01 04:42 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-08-01 05:03 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2025-08-01 18:07 -0500
Re: Why I've Dropped In MitchAlsup <user5857@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2025-08-27 01:01 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-11 17:19 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-11 12:16 -0700
Re: Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-12 02:11 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-12 11:48 -0700
Re: Why I've Dropped In "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-15 17:26 -0700
Re: Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-12 08:00 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-10 22:53 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-06-11 05:56 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2025-06-11 04:42 -0500
Re: Why I've Dropped In mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-11 16:37 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2025-06-11 14:47 -0500
Re: Why I've Dropped In mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-12 19:13 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2025-06-12 16:30 -0500
Re: Why I've Dropped In mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-13 00:00 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2025-06-15 13:21 -0500
Re: Why I've Dropped In mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-15 18:42 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2025-06-15 16:42 -0500
Re: Why I've Dropped In anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-06-11 16:51 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-11 19:08 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2025-06-11 18:00 -0400
Re: Why I've Dropped In mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-11 23:01 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-06-12 08:38 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-12 18:44 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-06-20 05:56 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-06-12 19:55 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2025-06-11 16:28 -0500
Re: Why I've Dropped In anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-06-12 07:05 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2025-06-12 15:27 -0500
Re: Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-20 15:30 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-20 15:59 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In moi <findlaybill@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2025-06-20 17:12 +0100
Re: Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-20 19:46 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In John Savard <quadibloc@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-23 16:03 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-11 14:12 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-11 16:49 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-11 17:34 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-11 19:16 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2025-06-14 14:22 -0500
Re: Why I've Dropped In Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2025-06-16 12:17 -0400
Re: Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-17 01:07 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2025-06-16 18:26 -0700
Re: Why I've Dropped In mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-17 17:45 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2025-06-17 11:09 -0700
Re: Why I've Dropped In Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2025-06-17 16:43 -0400
Re: Why I've Dropped In mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-17 21:18 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2025-06-17 18:14 -0400
Re: Why I've Dropped In anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-06-18 07:31 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2025-06-18 11:50 -0400
Re: Why I've Dropped In anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-06-19 08:56 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2025-06-18 15:37 -0500
Re: Why I've Dropped In "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-18 00:47 -0700
Re: Why I've Dropped In Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2025-06-18 11:22 -0400
Re: Why I've Dropped In "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-19 21:45 -0700
Re: Why I've Dropped In Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-06-11 17:05 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-12 15:00 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2025-06-12 08:44 -0700
Re: Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-13 03:09 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2025-06-12 20:36 -0700
Re: Why I've Dropped In Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-06-13 06:03 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-13 11:14 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2025-06-13 08:23 -0700
Re: Why I've Dropped In Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-06-13 17:40 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2025-06-13 10:57 -0700
Re: Why I've Dropped In Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-06-13 18:11 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-06-13 18:18 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-13 18:42 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2025-06-14 20:31 -0700
Re: Why I've Dropped In scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-06-15 15:55 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2025-06-13 11:55 -0700
Re: base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-06-15 17:15 +0000
Re: base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2025-06-15 12:17 -0700
Re: base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-06-15 19:44 +0000
Re: base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-15 20:09 +0000
Re: base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2025-06-15 21:02 -0700
Re: base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-16 14:37 +0000
Re: base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2025-06-16 07:55 -0700
Re: base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-16 17:42 +0000
Re: base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2025-06-16 10:56 -0700
Re: base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-16 21:52 +0000
Re: base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2025-06-16 15:04 -0700
Re: base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-06-16 18:11 +0000
Re: base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-06-16 14:25 +0000
Re: base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-16 14:45 +0000
Re: base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2025-06-15 14:39 -0700
Re: base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-06-16 02:33 +0000
Re: base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-06-16 14:22 +0000
Re: big pages, base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-06-16 16:42 +0000
Re: big pages, base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-06-16 16:52 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-06-13 19:49 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-13 18:37 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-06-13 21:09 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-13 20:27 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-06-14 10:48 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2025-06-14 09:45 -0700
Re: Why I've Dropped In EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2025-06-14 13:56 -0400
Re: Why I've Dropped In Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2025-06-14 12:23 -0700
Re: Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-14 21:26 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2025-06-14 14:37 -0700
Re: Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-14 21:49 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2025-06-14 20:34 -0700
Re: Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-15 03:52 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-15 04:04 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-15 04:09 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-15 04:38 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-06-15 07:37 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2025-06-15 07:00 -0700
Re: swapping pain, Why I've Dropped In John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-06-15 17:39 +0000
Re: swapping pain, Why I've Dropped In Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2025-06-15 12:23 -0700
Re: base hackery, Why I've Dropped In John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-06-15 17:22 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2025-06-15 09:48 -0400
Re: Why I've Dropped In Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-06-14 18:51 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2025-06-14 12:33 -0700
Re: Why I've Dropped In Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-06-14 20:06 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-15 19:29 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2025-06-18 09:55 -0700
Re: more addressing, Why I've Dropped In John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-06-18 18:19 +0000
Re: more addressing, Why I've Dropped In Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2025-06-18 12:07 -0700
Re: more addressing, Why I've Dropped In Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-06-19 06:13 +0000
Re: more addressing, Why I've Dropped In Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2025-06-18 23:39 -0700
Re: more addressing, Why I've Dropped In Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-06-19 07:46 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-06-13 13:14 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-13 11:52 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2025-06-13 08:15 -0700
Re: Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-13 19:50 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2025-06-13 13:50 -0700
Re: Why I've Dropped In mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-13 22:01 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2025-06-13 23:10 -0700
Re: Why I've Dropped In anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-06-14 09:26 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-06-14 10:44 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-06-14 15:40 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2025-06-14 09:24 -0700
Re: Why I've Dropped In Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-06-14 16:49 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-06-14 16:39 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-06-15 01:07 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-06-15 07:10 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-06-15 16:01 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-06-15 16:53 +0000
Re: static linked libraries, Why I've Dropped In John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-06-15 17:54 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In Robert Swindells <rjs@fdy2.co.uk> - 2025-06-15 19:24 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-06-16 14:15 +0000
Re: static libraries, Why I've Dropped In John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-06-15 17:00 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In John Savard <quadibloc@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-24 10:47 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-06-14 16:56 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-06-14 12:42 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-06-14 15:53 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-14 17:02 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-14 21:19 +0000
Re: fitting programs in Why I've Dropped In John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-06-14 22:12 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2025-06-14 20:51 -0700
Re: base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-06-15 18:08 +0000
Re: base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2025-06-15 12:38 -0700
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-06-15 20:20 +0000
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In Al Kossow <aek@bitsavers.org> - 2025-06-15 18:48 -0700
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2025-06-18 10:35 -0700
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-06-18 19:51 +0000
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2025-06-18 15:30 -0700
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-06-19 01:23 +0000
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2025-06-18 19:41 -0700
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-19 05:36 +0000
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2025-06-18 23:10 -0700
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2025-06-19 09:35 -0400
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-06-19 15:11 +0000
Re: Fortran, old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-06-19 18:03 +0000
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-19 18:53 +0000
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-19 23:18 +0000
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2025-06-20 15:13 -0400
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-06-20 20:35 +0000
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-20 21:27 +0000
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-20 21:09 +0000
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-20 21:48 +0000
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2025-06-21 14:57 -0400
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-19 23:36 +0000
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-06-20 01:32 +0000
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-20 13:45 +0000
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-06-20 17:19 +0000
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-06-20 18:06 +0000
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-06-20 18:31 +0000
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2025-06-20 12:27 -0700
Re: emulation, old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-06-20 20:16 +0000
Re: emulation, old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-06-20 20:47 +0000
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-06-20 21:26 +0000
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-06-21 14:33 +0000
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-20 21:34 +0000
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-20 23:57 +0000
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-21 00:06 +0000
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-21 00:13 +0000
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2025-06-20 23:20 -0700
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-21 07:40 +0000
Killer Micros (was: old and slow base and bounds) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-06-21 09:56 +0000
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-06-21 14:25 +0000
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2025-06-21 11:39 -0400
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-21 16:50 +0100
Re: mainframe vs mini, old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-06-21 17:59 +0000
Re: mainframe vs mini, old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-21 18:26 +0000
Re: mainframe vs mini, old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-06-21 19:37 +0000
Re: mainframe vs mini, old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-06-21 20:27 +0000
Re: mainframe vs mini, old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-06-21 20:31 +0000
Re: mainframe vs mini, old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-21 20:36 +0000
Re: mainframe vs mini, old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-21 14:27 -0700
Re: mainframe vs mini, old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2025-06-24 09:45 +0200
Re: mainframe vs mini, old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-06-22 06:34 +0000
Re: mainframe vs mini, old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In Andreas Eder <a_eder_muc@web.de> - 2025-06-22 11:52 +0200
Re: mainframe vs mini, old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-22 00:55 +0000
Re: mainframe vs mini, old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-01 14:22 +0100
Re: mainframe vs mini, old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-07-01 17:39 +0000
Re: mainframe vs mini, old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-07-01 18:00 +0000
Re: mainframe vs mini, old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-06-22 20:23 +0000
Re: mainframe vs mini, old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2025-06-22 12:15 -1000
Re: mainframe vs mini, old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-22 22:44 +0000
Re: mainframe vs mini, old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2025-06-23 09:23 -0400
Re: mainframe vs mini, old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-23 20:04 +0000
Re: mainframe vs mini, old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-06-23 23:16 +0000
Re: mainframe vs mini, old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In Al Kossow <aek@bitsavers.org> - 2025-06-23 17:02 -0700
Re: mainframe vs mini, old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-24 00:25 +0000
Re: mainframe vs mini, old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-24 00:53 +0000
Re: mainframe vs mini, old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-24 02:49 +0000
Re: mainframe vs mini, old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-06-24 06:21 +0000
Re: mainframe vs mini, old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2025-06-24 09:59 +0200
Re: mainframe vs mini, old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-06-24 06:16 +0000
Re: mainframe vs mini, old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-06-24 14:12 +0000
Re: mainframe vs mini, old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In Al Kossow <aek@bitsavers.org> - 2025-06-24 07:43 -0700
Re: mainframe vs mini, old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-24 14:53 +0000
Re: mainframe vs mini, old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-06-24 14:48 +0000
Re: mainframe vs mini, old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2025-06-24 13:01 -0400
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-21 17:49 +0000
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-06-21 14:36 +0000
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-19 13:37 +0000
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-06-19 17:52 +0000
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-19 19:00 +0000
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2025-06-20 07:42 -0700
Re: cramming 24 bits of address into 16 bits, was old and slow base and bounds John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-06-20 18:40 +0000
Re: cramming 24 bits of address into 16 bits, was old and slow base and bounds EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2025-06-20 17:15 -0400
Re: cramming 24 bits of address into 16 bits, was old and slow base and bounds Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-06-20 21:30 +0000
Re: cramming 24 bits of address into 16 bits, was old and slow base and bounds John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-06-21 17:21 +0000
Re: cramming 24 bits of address into 16 bits, was old and slow base and bounds EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2025-06-21 15:46 -0400
Re: cramming 24 bits of address into 16 bits, was old and slow base and bounds Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2025-06-21 22:42 -0700
Re: cramming 24 bits of address into 16 bits, was old and slow base and bounds Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2025-06-24 10:58 -0700
Re: cramming 24 bits of address into 16 bits, was old and slow base and bounds John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-06-24 19:31 +0000
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2025-06-19 12:36 -0700
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-06-19 21:45 +0000
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2025-06-19 16:05 -0700
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-19 23:45 +0000
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-20 14:51 +0000
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-20 15:55 +0000
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-06-19 20:25 +0000
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-06-19 12:12 +0000
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2025-06-19 10:32 -0400
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-06-19 14:54 +0000
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2025-06-19 20:36 -0400
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-06-20 01:10 +0000
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-20 01:15 +0000
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-06-21 12:04 +0000
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-06-21 20:32 +0000
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-06-22 01:26 +0000
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-06-22 01:36 +0000
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-06-22 08:57 +0000
Re: linking and sortiing, old and slow base and bounds, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-06-22 17:52 +0000
Re: linking and sortiing, old and slow base and bounds, mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-22 18:25 +0000
Re: linking and sortiing, old and slow base and bounds, scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-06-22 20:29 +0000
Re: tape hacks, linking and sortiing John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-06-22 22:44 +0000
Re: linking and sortiing, old and slow base and bounds, Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-06-23 06:07 +0000
Re: linking and sortiing, old and slow base and bounds, quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-23 09:56 +0000
Re: linking and sortiing, old and slow base and bounds, quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-23 10:01 +0000
Re: linking and sortiing, old and slow base and bounds, Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-06-23 17:13 +0000
Re: old and slow base and bounds, Why I've Dropped In John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-06-22 01:31 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-14 17:00 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In John Savard <quadibloc@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-28 23:18 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2025-07-28 22:56 -0500
Re: Why I've Dropped In MitchAlsup <user5857@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2025-08-26 21:46 +0000
VAX (was: Why I've Dropped In) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-07-29 08:45 +0000
Re: VAX (was: Why I've Dropped In) John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-07-29 16:44 +0000
Re: VAX (was: Why I've Dropped In) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-07-30 05:59 +0000
Re: VAX BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2025-07-30 04:02 -0500
Re: VAX Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-07-30 16:24 +0000
Re: VAX BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2025-07-30 13:24 -0500
Re: VAX anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-08-01 17:02 +0000
Re: VAX BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2025-08-01 15:24 -0500
Re: VAX anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-08-02 15:33 +0000
Re: VAX BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2025-08-02 15:15 -0500
Re: VAX BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2025-08-02 18:55 -0500
Re: VAX anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-08-04 16:33 +0000
Re: VAX MitchAlsup <user5857@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2025-08-25 00:56 +0000
Re: VAX MitchAlsup <user5857@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2025-08-31 18:04 +0000
What is more important MitchAlsup <user5857@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2025-09-04 15:23 +0000
Re: What is more important Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2025-09-04 10:25 -0700
Re: What is more important MitchAlsup <user5857@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2025-09-04 21:00 +0000
Re: What is more important BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2025-09-04 16:54 -0500
Re: What is more important anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-09-05 15:03 +0000
Re: What is more important BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2025-09-05 14:26 -0500
Re: What is more important BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2025-09-05 14:38 -0500
Re: What is more important Robert Finch <robfi680@gmail.com> - 2025-09-05 21:56 -0400
Re: What is more important Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-09-10 13:31 +0000
Re: VAX (was: Why I've Dropped In) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-07-30 17:17 +0000
Re: VAX (was: Why I've Dropped In) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-08-01 17:16 +0000
Re: VAX (was: Why I've Dropped In) scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-08-01 18:11 +0000
Re: VAX (was: Why I've Dropped In) cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2025-08-01 20:41 +0000
Re: VAX (was: Why I've Dropped In) Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-08-02 09:07 +0000
Re: VAX (was: Why I've Dropped In) Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-02 23:21 +0000
Re: VAX Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2025-08-02 23:10 -0400
Re: VAX Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-03 09:14 +0000
Re: VAX Peter Flass <Peter@Iron-Spring.com> - 2025-08-03 07:41 -0700
Re: VAX anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-08-06 10:24 +0000
Re: VAX Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-06 23:40 +0000
Re: VAX John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-08-04 08:32 -0700
Re: VAX BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2025-08-04 11:47 -0500
Re: VAX scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-08-04 17:20 +0000
Re: 32 vs 64 bits, was VAX John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-08-04 18:17 +0000
Re: 32 vs 64 bits, was VAX Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-08-04 22:17 +0300
Re: 32 vs 64 bits, was VAX Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-05 01:36 +0000
Re: 32 vs 64 bits, was VAX Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-08-04 20:00 +0000
Re: IBM's 32 vs 64 bits, was VAX John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-08-04 21:04 +0000
Re: IBM's 32 vs 64 bits, was VAX Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2025-08-07 07:32 -1000
Re: VAX Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2025-08-04 15:40 -0400
Re: VAX anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-08-06 16:34 +0000
Re: VAX Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2025-08-31 16:43 -0400
Re: VAX Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-31 22:26 +0000
Re: VAX anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-09-01 06:07 +0000
Re: VAX Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-09-01 06:57 +0000
Debian on AMD64 (was: VAX) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-09-01 07:40 +0000
Re: Debian on AMD64 Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2025-09-01 12:15 -0400
Re: Debian on AMD64 BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2025-09-01 11:33 -0500
Re: Debian on AMD64 anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-09-01 20:34 +0000
Re: VAX Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> - 2025-09-21 16:20 +0200
Re: VAX Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-21 15:45 +0100
Re: VAX Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-09-21 17:54 +0300
Re: VAX Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2025-08-04 14:06 -0700
Re: VAX Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-08-05 00:21 +0300
Re: VAX scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-08-04 21:51 +0000
Re: VAX antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-08-04 23:38 +0000
Re: VAX Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-05 01:39 +0000
Re: VAX "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2025-08-05 09:25 +0100
Re: VAX Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2025-08-05 17:24 +0200
Re: VAX scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-08-05 15:41 +0000
System calls (was: VAX) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-08-13 07:32 +0000
Re: System calls (was: VAX) scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-08-13 15:03 +0000
Re: System calls (was: VAX) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-08-13 16:10 +0000
Re: System calls (was: VAX) scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-08-13 18:15 +0000
Re: System calls (was: VAX) cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2025-08-13 19:40 +0000
Re: System calls (was: VAX) cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2025-08-13 19:25 +0000
Re: System calls (was: VAX) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-08-13 21:23 +0000
Re: System calls (was: VAX) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-08-14 07:58 +0000
Re: System calls (was: VAX) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-08-14 13:28 +0000
Re: System calls (was: VAX) cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2025-08-14 15:14 +0000
Re: System calls (was: VAX) cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2025-08-14 15:25 +0000
Re: System calls (was: VAX) scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-08-14 15:32 +0000
Re: System calls (was: VAX) cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2025-08-14 15:44 +0000
Re: System calls David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-08-14 19:15 +0200
Re: System calls Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-08-14 17:43 +0000
Re: System calls David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-08-15 17:49 +0200
Re: System calls cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2025-08-14 21:44 +0000
Re: System calls David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-08-15 17:49 +0200
Re: System calls cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2025-08-15 18:33 +0000
Re: System calls (was: VAX) cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2025-08-13 18:51 +0000
Re: System calls (was: VAX) scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-08-13 20:28 +0000
Re: VAX antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-08-13 19:35 +0000
Re: VAX Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-06 00:49 +0000
Re: VAX scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-08-06 13:48 +0000
Re: VAX antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-08-04 23:24 +0000
Re: VAX Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-05 01:41 +0000
Re: VAX vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-08-05 05:56 +0000
Re: VAX Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-05 01:34 +0000
Re: VAX Peter Flass <Peter@Iron-Spring.com> - 2025-08-01 20:06 -0700
Re: VAX Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-02 03:37 +0000
Re: VAX ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan <tednolan>) - 2025-08-02 04:14 +0000
Re: VAX "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-08-01 21:35 -0700
Re: VAX antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-08-02 08:07 +0000
Re: VAX Al Kossow <aek@bitsavers.org> - 2025-08-02 01:48 -0700
Re: VAX antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-08-04 23:45 +0000
Re: VAX Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-02 23:08 +0000
Re: VAX anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-08-03 16:51 +0000
Re: VAX Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-04 00:04 +0000
Re: VAX BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2025-08-03 21:07 -0500
Re: VAX Peter Flass <Peter@Iron-Spring.com> - 2025-08-03 20:39 -0700
Re: VAX Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-04 04:50 +0000
Re: VAX Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-08-04 12:35 +0300
Re: VAX BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2025-08-04 11:59 -0500
Re: VAX Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-08-04 12:19 +0300
Re: VAX anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-08-04 12:09 +0000
Re: VAX anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-08-04 14:51 +0000
Re: VAX Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-08-04 18:28 +0300
Re: VAX Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-08-04 09:53 -0700
Re: VAX Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-08-04 16:58 +0000
Re: VAX "Brian G. Lucas" <bagel99@gmail.com> - 2025-08-05 13:03 -0500
Re: VAX Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-08-04 22:03 +0300
Re: VAX James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-08-04 15:25 -0400
Re: VAX Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-08-04 22:40 +0300
Re: VAX "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-08-04 12:44 -0700
Re: VAX Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-08-04 22:21 -0700
Re: VAX Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-08-05 21:25 +0000
Re: VAX Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-08-05 19:14 -0700
Re: VAX Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-08-06 04:31 +0000
Re: VAX Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-08-06 11:48 +0300
Re: VAX James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-08-06 11:56 -0400
Re: VAX Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-08-05 21:13 +0000
Re: VAX James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-08-06 11:54 -0400
Re: VAX Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-08-06 13:58 -0700
Re: VAX Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-08-05 21:08 +0000
Re: VAX Jakob Bohm <egenagwemdimtapsar@jbohm.dk> - 2025-08-17 20:18 +0200
Re: VAX Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-08-17 22:18 -0700
Re: VAX Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-08-18 08:02 +0100
Re: VAX David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-08-18 11:34 +0200
Re: VAX Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-08-18 21:57 -0700
Re: VAX anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-08-04 15:11 +0000
Re: VAX Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-08-04 19:00 +0300
Re: VAX Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-08-04 19:04 +0300
Re: VAX Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2025-08-04 22:49 +0200
Re: VAX Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-08-05 00:14 +0300
Re: VAX Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-08-05 01:43 +0300
Re: VAX Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2025-08-05 17:31 +0200
Re: VAX Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-08-05 19:49 +0300
Re: VAX Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2025-08-05 22:17 +0200
Re: VAX Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-08-06 00:21 +0300
Re: VAX Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2025-08-06 16:19 +0200
3-way long addition (was: VAX) Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-08-06 20:43 +0300
Re: 3-way long addition Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2025-08-07 15:15 +0200
3-way long addition (was: VAX) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-08-19 05:47 +0000
Re: 3-way long addition (was: VAX) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-08-19 07:09 +0000
Re: 3-way long addition Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2025-08-19 12:11 +0200
Re: 3-way long addition anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-08-19 17:43 +0000
Re: 3-way long addition (was: VAX) Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-08-19 17:20 +0300
Re: 3-way long addition (was: VAX) Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-08-19 17:24 +0300
Re: 3-way long addition (was: VAX) Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-08-19 23:03 +0300
Re: 3-way long addition Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2025-08-20 10:50 +0200
Re: 3-way long addition Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-08-20 14:16 +0300
Intel ADX (was: 3-way long addition) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-08-20 14:08 +0000
Re: VAX Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-08-04 18:25 +0300
Re: VAX BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2025-08-04 12:56 -0500
Re: VAX scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-08-04 14:22 +0000
Re: VAX Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2025-08-04 16:46 +0200
Re: VAX scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-08-04 15:05 +0000
Re: VAX Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-08-04 18:07 +0300
Re: VAX scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-08-04 15:32 +0000
Re: VAX Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2025-08-04 15:09 -0400
Re: VAX Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-08-04 22:31 +0300
Re: VAX scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-08-04 20:29 +0000
Re: VAX Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-08-05 00:08 +0300
Re: VAX scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-08-04 21:23 +0000
Re: VAX Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-05 06:46 +0000
Re: VAX BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2025-08-05 03:14 -0500
Re: VAX Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2025-08-05 11:52 -0700
Re: VAX Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-08-06 05:37 +0000
Re: VAX Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-06 06:20 +0000
Re: VAX BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2025-08-04 12:12 -0500
I32LP64 vs. ILP64 (was: VAX) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-08-06 11:28 +0000
Re: I32LP64 vs. ILP64 antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-08-06 15:55 +0000
Re: I32LP64 vs. ILP64 BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2025-08-06 12:47 -0500
Re: I32LP64 vs. ILP64 BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2025-08-06 12:00 -0500
Re: I32LP64 vs. ILP64 (was: VAX) Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-06 23:34 +0000
Re: VAX Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-05 05:38 +0000
Re: VAX anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-08-06 11:05 +0000
Re: VAX BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2025-08-06 12:12 -0500
Re: VAX scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-08-06 18:22 +0000
Re: VAX anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-08-06 10:32 +0000
Re: 64 bits, was VAX John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-08-06 17:25 +0000
Re: 64 bits, was VAX Peter Flass <Peter@Iron-Spring.com> - 2025-08-06 12:11 -0700
Re: individual 64 bits, was VAX John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-08-06 19:50 +0000
Re: individual 64 bits, was VAX scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-08-06 20:30 +0000
Re: 64 bits, was VAX Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-06 23:36 +0000
Re: 64 bits, was VAX Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2025-08-07 15:44 +0200
Re: 64 bits, was VAX Peter Flass <Peter@Iron-Spring.com> - 2025-08-07 07:34 -0700
Re: 64 bits, S/360 was VAX John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-08-07 20:54 +0000
Re: 64 bits, was VAX Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-08 03:51 +0000
Bit addressing (was: 64 bits) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-08-07 14:57 +0000
Re: Bit addressing drb@ihatespam.msu.edu (Dennis Boone) - 2025-08-07 15:54 +0000
Re: Bit addressing Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2025-08-07 13:01 -0700
Re: Bit addressing (was: 64 bits) Al Kossow <aek@bitsavers.org> - 2025-08-07 13:34 -0700
Re: VAX Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-08-06 23:12 +0000
Re: VAX John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-08-06 23:15 +0000
Re: VAX Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-08-06 23:32 +0000
Re: word lengths in C, was VAX John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-08-07 02:56 +0000
Re: VAX anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-08-07 11:21 +0000
Re: VAX scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-08-07 13:34 +0000
Re: VAX Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-06 23:38 +0000
Re: VAX Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-08-04 12:42 +0300
Re: VAX Al Kossow <aek@bitsavers.org> - 2025-08-04 03:32 -0700
Re: VAX Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-05 05:37 +0000
Re: VAX anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-08-04 13:42 +0000
Re: VAX Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2025-08-04 16:50 +0100
Re: VAX antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-08-04 23:52 +0000
Re: VAX Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-05 05:35 +0000
Re: VAX cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2025-08-05 01:31 +0000
Re: VAX scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-08-05 13:46 +0000
Re: VAX cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2025-08-05 17:21 +0000
ILP32 code on 64-bit substrate (was: VAX) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-08-12 15:28 +0000
Re: ILP32 code on 64-bit substrate (was: VAX) scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-08-12 16:08 +0000
Re: ILP32 code on 64-bit substrate BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2025-08-12 11:53 -0500
Re: ILP32 code on 64-bit substrate aph@littlepinkcloud.invalid - 2025-08-12 17:57 +0000
Re: ILP32 code on 64-bit substrate John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-08-12 19:09 +0000
Re: ILP32 code on 64-bit substrate OrangeFish <OrangeFish@invalid.invalid> - 2025-08-15 11:42 -0400
Re: ILP32 code on 64-bit substrate anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-08-13 06:11 +0000
Re: ILP32 code on 64-bit substrate scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-08-13 14:24 +0000
Re: ILP32 code on 64-bit substrate anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-08-13 18:13 +0000
Re: VAX (was: Why I've Dropped In) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-08-02 09:28 +0000
Re: VAX (was: Why I've Dropped In) Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-08-02 15:29 +0000
Re: VAX Peter Flass <Peter@Iron-Spring.com> - 2025-08-02 15:33 -0700
Re: VAX Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-02 23:17 +0000
Re: VAX (was: Why I've Dropped In) Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-02 23:20 +0000
Re: VAX (was: Why I've Dropped In) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-08-04 17:23 +0000
Re: VAX (was: Why I've Dropped In) Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-08-04 18:16 +0000
Re: VAX EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2025-08-04 14:39 -0400
Re: VAX Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-08-04 19:59 +0000
Re: VAX (was: Why I've Dropped In) scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-08-04 18:59 +0000
Re: VAX (was: Why I've Dropped In) Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-08-04 22:12 +0300
Re: VAX (was: Why I've Dropped In) Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-08-04 20:13 +0000
Re: VAX (was: Why I've Dropped In) Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-08-04 23:54 +0300
Re: VAX (was: Why I've Dropped In) Al Kossow <aek@bitsavers.org> - 2025-08-04 14:41 -0700
Re: VAX BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2025-08-04 17:18 -0500
Re: VAX Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-05 01:53 +0000
Re: VAX "Brian G. Lucas" <bagel99@gmail.com> - 2025-08-05 13:04 -0500
O.T. Where is Mitch? Was: VAX Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-08-07 23:48 +0300
Re: O.T. Where is Mitch? Was: VAX "Brian G. Lucas" <bagel99@gmail.com> - 2025-08-07 16:01 -0500
Re: O.T. Where is Mitch? Was: VAX BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2025-08-08 01:41 -0500
Re: O.T. Where is Mitch? Was: VAX Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2025-08-08 11:58 +0200
Re: O.T. Where is Mitch? Was: VAX Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-08-08 13:20 +0300
Re: O.T. Where is Mitch? Was: VAX scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-08-08 14:22 +0000
Re: O.T. Where is Mitch? Was: VAX Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> - 2025-08-08 18:34 +0300
Re: O.T. Where is Mitch? Was: VAX George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2025-08-08 19:07 -0400
Re: VAX (was: Why I've Dropped In) Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-08-05 21:01 +0000
Re: VAX (was: Why I've Dropped In) Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-06 00:59 +0000
Re: VAX Peter Flass <Peter@Iron-Spring.com> - 2025-08-05 20:15 -0700
Re: VAX Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-08-06 05:50 +0000
Re: VAX Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-06 07:28 +0000
Re: VAX cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2025-08-06 10:48 +0000
Re: VAX Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-08-06 16:35 +0000
Re: VAX cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2025-08-08 01:57 +0000
Re: VAX (was: Why I've Dropped In) John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-08-06 08:28 -0700
Re: VAX (was: Why I've Dropped In) Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-06 23:45 +0000
Re: VAX (was: Why I've Dropped In) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-08-07 01:49 +0000
Re: VAX (was: Why I've Dropped In) John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-08-07 08:28 -0700
Re: VAX (was: Why I've Dropped In) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-08-13 09:37 +0000
Re: VAX (was: Why I've Dropped In) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-08-13 08:22 +0000
Re: VAX (was: Why I've Dropped In) scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-08-13 14:26 +0000
Re: VAX (was: Why I've Dropped In) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-08-13 17:50 +0000
Re: VAX drb@ihatespam.msu.edu (Dennis Boone) - 2025-08-14 17:12 +0000
Re: VAX EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2025-08-14 15:22 -0400
Re: VAX Al Kossow <aek@bitsavers.org> - 2025-08-14 12:59 -0700
Re: VAX (was: Why I've Dropped In) scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-08-13 14:44 +0000
Re: VAX (was: Why I've Dropped In) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-08-13 17:46 +0000
Re: VAX (was: Why I've Dropped In) ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan <tednolan>) - 2025-08-13 18:26 +0000
Re: VAX Peter Flass <Peter@Iron-Spring.com> - 2025-08-13 12:09 -0700
Re: VAX (was: Why I've Dropped In) Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-05 01:47 +0000
Re: VAX (was: Why I've Dropped In) scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-08-05 13:58 +0000
Re: VAX (was: Why I've Dropped In) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-08-06 16:47 +0000
Re: VAX Peter Flass <Peter@Iron-Spring.com> - 2025-08-06 12:12 -0700
Re: VAX Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-08-07 01:36 +0000
Re: VAX (was: Why I've Dropped In) Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-08-07 05:29 +0000
Re: VAX Peter Flass <Peter@Iron-Spring.com> - 2025-08-07 07:26 -0700
Re: VAX Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-08 03:57 +0000
Re: VAX Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-08-08 11:43 +0300
Re: VAX (was: Why I've Dropped In) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-08-06 14:00 +0000
Re: VAX (was: Why I've Dropped In) Al Kossow <aek@bitsavers.org> - 2025-08-06 10:20 -0700
Re: VAX (was: Why I've Dropped In) Robert Swindells <rjs@fdy2.co.uk> - 2025-08-06 22:30 +0000
Re: VAX EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2025-08-06 20:21 -0400
Re: VAX Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-07 02:22 +0000
Re: VAX John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-08-07 08:38 -0700
Re: VAX Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2025-08-07 17:52 +0200
Re: VAX George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2025-08-07 21:53 -0400
Re: VAX anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-08-08 06:16 +0000
Re: VAX George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2025-08-08 19:48 -0400
Re: VAX anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-08-07 10:27 +0000
Re: VAX antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-08-07 11:06 +0000
Re: VAX (was: Why I've Dropped In) Al Kossow <aek@bitsavers.org> - 2025-08-04 12:27 -0700
Re: VAX (was: Why I've Dropped In) Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-05 01:46 +0000
Re: VAX (was: Why I've Dropped In) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-08-06 16:21 +0000
Re: VAX (was: Why I've Dropped In) Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-05 01:43 +0000
Re: VAX antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-08-01 23:41 +0000
Re: VAX anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-08-03 16:42 +0000
Re: VAX antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-08-05 00:55 +0000
Re: VAX Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-08-05 05:44 +0000
Re: VAX anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-08-12 15:02 +0000
Re: VAX EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2025-08-13 14:40 -0400
Re: VAX antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-08-15 03:20 +0000
Re: VAX scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-08-15 15:10 +0000
Re: VAX pages John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-08-15 16:53 +0000
Re: VAX pages BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2025-08-15 13:19 -0500
Re: VAX pages Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2025-08-15 12:03 -0700
Re: VAX pages scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-08-15 19:19 +0000
Re: VAX and other pages John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-08-15 20:40 +0000
Re: VAX and other pages anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-08-15 21:22 +0000
Re: VAX and other pages John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-08-16 01:22 +0000
Re: VAX and other pages anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-08-16 05:09 +0000
Re: VAX and other pages Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2025-08-16 10:00 -0700
Re: VAX and other pages John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-08-16 17:06 +0000
Re: VAX and other pages antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-08-20 01:49 +0000
Re: VAX and other pages John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-08-20 02:49 +0000
Re: VAX pages BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2025-08-16 03:17 -0500
Re: VAX antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-07-31 04:26 +0000
Re: VAX John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-07-31 16:05 +0000
Re: VAX scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-07-31 19:01 +0000
Re: VAX John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-07-31 19:57 +0000
Re: VAX scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-07-31 21:24 +0000
Re: VAX antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-08-01 02:18 +0000
Re: VAX encoding John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-08-01 15:30 +0000
Re: VAX encoding antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-08-01 18:08 +0000
Re: VAX encoding scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-08-01 18:33 +0000
Re: VAX encoding antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-08-01 21:24 +0000
Re: VAX encoding Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-08-01 19:13 +0000
Re: VAX encoding MitchAlsup <user5857@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2025-08-28 15:10 +0000
Re: VAX encoding EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2025-08-29 10:34 -0400
Re: VAX anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-08-02 09:02 +0000
Re: VAX antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-08-05 01:43 +0000
Re: VAX Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-08-05 05:48 +0000
Re: VAX antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-08-05 14:13 +0000
Re: VAX George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2025-08-05 17:41 -0400
Re: VAX EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2025-08-06 10:23 -0400
Re: VAX George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2025-08-08 21:43 -0400
Re: VAX scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-08-05 13:56 +0000
Re: VAX cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2025-08-05 16:44 +0000
Re: VAX Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-08-06 05:53 +0000
Re: VAX cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2025-08-06 11:10 +0000
Re: VAX Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-08-06 20:06 +0000
Re: VAX EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2025-08-06 17:00 -0400
Re: VAX scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-08-06 21:14 +0000
Re: VAX anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-08-07 11:59 +0000
Re: VAX scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-08-07 15:03 +0000
Re: VAX EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2025-08-06 17:57 -0400
Re: VAX antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-08-07 11:29 +0000
Re: VAX anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-08-07 11:38 +0000
Re: VAX BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2025-08-16 15:26 -0500
Re: VAX anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-08-17 06:16 +0000
Re: VAX BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2025-08-17 11:29 -0500
Re: VAX EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2025-08-17 10:00 -0400
Re: VAX anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-08-17 15:21 +0000
Re: VAX anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-08-17 19:10 +0000
Re: VAX BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2025-08-17 15:08 -0500
Re: VAX EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2025-08-18 11:03 -0400
Re: VAX anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-08-18 15:35 +0000
Re: VAX scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-08-18 17:19 +0000
Re: VAX EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2025-08-20 14:36 -0400
Re: VAX EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2025-08-20 16:41 -0400
Re: VAX antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-08-21 16:21 +0000
Re: VAX BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2025-08-17 12:53 -0500
Re: VAX Robert Swindells <rjs@fdy2.co.uk> - 2025-08-06 23:43 +0000
Re: VAX anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-08-07 10:47 +0000
Re: VAX EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2025-08-08 10:08 -0400
Re: VAX Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-08-09 08:07 +0000
Re: VAX EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2025-08-09 10:03 -0400
Re: VAX Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-08-09 20:54 +0000
Re: VAX Al Kossow <aek@bitsavers.org> - 2025-08-09 14:57 -0700
Re: VAX EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2025-08-13 14:18 -0400
Re: VAX Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-08-13 20:23 +0000
Re: VAX EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2025-08-17 13:35 -0400
Re: VAX BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2025-08-17 18:56 -0500
Re: VAX EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2025-08-20 19:17 -0400
Re: VAX BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 23:50 -0500
Re: VAX EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2025-08-06 20:41 -0400
Re: VAX antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-08-07 11:16 +0000
Re: VAX cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2025-08-09 09:04 +0000
Re: VAX Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-08-09 10:00 +0000
Re: VAX cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2025-08-10 12:06 +0000
Re: VAX scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-08-10 15:18 +0000
Re: byte me, PDP-10 edition, was VAX John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-08-10 19:55 +0000
Re: VAX anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-08-11 08:17 +0000
Re: VAX scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-08-11 14:51 +0000
Re: VAX Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-08-11 17:27 +0000
Re: VAX Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-08-10 21:01 +0000
Re: VAX cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2025-08-13 11:25 +0000
Re: VAX Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-08-15 05:07 +0000
Re: VAX cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2025-08-15 12:57 +0000
Re: VAX Robert Swindells <rjs@fdy2.co.uk> - 2025-08-15 13:36 +0000
Re: VAX Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-08-18 05:48 +0000
Re: VAX antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-08-05 20:34 +0000
Re: VAX anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-08-12 15:59 +0000
Re: VAX antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-08-20 03:47 +0000
Re: VAX Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-08-21 19:26 +0000
Re: VAX antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-08-22 16:36 +0000
Re: VAX Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-08-22 17:21 +0000
Re: VAX John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-08-22 16:45 +0000
Re: VAX antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-08-23 16:38 +0000
Re: 360/91, was VAX John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-08-23 19:36 +0000
Re: VAX anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-08-01 17:25 +0000
Re: VAX MitchAlsup <user5857@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2025-08-27 00:56 +0000
Re: VAX antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-08-28 07:49 +0000
Re: VAX (was: Why I've Dropped In) MitchAlsup <user5857@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2025-08-27 00:35 +0000
Re: VAX (was: Why I've Dropped In) Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-08-27 05:12 +0000
Re: VAX EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2025-08-27 10:56 -0400
Re: VAX EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2025-08-28 13:39 -0400
Re: VAX (was: Why I've Dropped In) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-08-27 17:19 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-06-14 17:30 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-14 18:39 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-06-13 17:42 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2025-06-13 11:00 -0700
Re: Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-14 16:04 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-14 16:12 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-14 16:50 +0000
Re: base registers and addres size, Why I've Dropped In John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-06-14 22:02 +0000
Re: base registers and addres size, Why I've Dropped In mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-14 22:58 +0000
Re: base registers and addres size, Why I've Dropped In John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-06-15 01:08 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2025-06-17 16:47 -1000
Re: Why I've Dropped In scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-06-18 13:48 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2025-06-13 17:52 -0500
Re: Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-14 04:04 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-06-14 10:45 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-06-11 17:33 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-11 18:14 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-11 12:30 -0700
Re: Why I've Dropped In "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-11 12:31 -0700
Re: Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-12 02:17 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-12 11:55 -0700
Re: Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-13 03:30 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-13 20:40 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-15 16:56 -0700
Re: Why I've Dropped In mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-11 21:26 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-06-12 06:30 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-12 07:57 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-12 14:06 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-06-12 13:43 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-06-13 07:31 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-06-13 14:48 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-06-13 15:38 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-06-13 17:10 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-06-17 11:44 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-06-17 16:00 +0200
Code density (was: Why I've Dropped In) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-06-17 14:17 +0000
Re: Code density (was: Why I've Dropped In) scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-06-17 15:11 +0000
Re: Code density mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-17 18:01 +0000
Re: Code density EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2025-06-17 23:55 -0400
Re: Code density anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-06-18 06:22 +0000
Re: Code density EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2025-06-18 09:32 -0400
Re: Code density "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2025-06-18 16:19 +0100
Re: Code density mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-18 18:27 +0000
Re: Code density anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-06-19 09:21 +0000
Re: Code density EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2025-06-22 10:05 -0400
Re: Code density mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-22 17:35 +0000
Re: Code density scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-06-22 20:26 +0000
Re: Code density mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-26 01:12 +0000
Re: Code density scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-06-26 15:17 +0000
Re: Code density EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2025-06-27 07:48 -0400
Re: Code density EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2025-06-27 08:33 -0400
Re: Code density Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2025-06-27 22:41 -0700
Re: Code density Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-06-28 07:45 +0000
Re: Code density anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-06-28 11:11 +0000
Re: Code density Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-06-28 12:00 +0000
Re: Code density mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-28 16:01 +0000
Re: Code density Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-06-29 14:54 +0000
Re: Code density Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2025-06-29 18:01 +0200
Re: Code density mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-29 20:50 +0000
Re: Code density EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2025-06-29 13:21 -0400
Re: Code density Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-06-29 20:41 +0000
Re: Code density George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2025-06-28 08:05 -0400
Re: Code density "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-28 21:29 -0700
Re: Code density scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-06-27 13:55 +0000
Re: Code density EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2025-06-27 15:09 -0400
Re: Code density scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-06-27 21:01 +0000
Re: Code density Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-06-28 09:07 +0000
Re: Code density John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-06-28 16:30 +0000
Re: errno, Code density John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-06-27 21:44 +0000
Re: errno, Code density EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2025-06-29 14:02 -0400
Re: errno, Code density anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-06-30 06:21 +0000
Re: errno, Code density EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2025-06-30 12:51 -0400
Re: errno, Code density scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-06-30 17:13 +0000
Re: errno, Code density Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-07-01 13:11 +0300
Re: errno, Code density scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-07-01 13:18 +0000
Re: errno, Code density Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-07-01 16:21 +0300
Re: errno, Code density Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-07-01 16:28 +0300
Re: errno, Code density scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-07-01 14:08 +0000
Re: errno, Code density EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2025-07-01 11:09 -0400
Re: assemblers, errno, Code density John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-07-01 17:41 +0000
Re: errno, Code density mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-30 17:11 +0000
Re: errno, Code density EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2025-07-02 08:06 -0400
Re: errno, Code density mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-07-02 15:38 +0000
Re: errno, Code density Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-06-30 13:55 +0300
Re: Code density George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2025-06-28 07:02 -0400
Re: Code density anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-06-30 16:08 +0000
Re: Code density anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-07-01 16:08 +0000
Re: Code density mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-07-01 20:03 +0000
Re: Code density scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-07-01 21:07 +0000
Re: Code density mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-07-01 23:20 +0000
Re: Code density John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-07-02 17:14 +0000
Re: Code density EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2025-07-02 15:38 -0400
Re: Code density EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2025-07-03 08:41 -0400
Re: Code density mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-07-16 01:18 +0000
Re: Code density EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2025-07-18 13:23 -0400
Re: Code density mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-07-18 19:54 +0000
Re: Code density EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2025-07-20 13:05 -0400
Re: Code density anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-07-20 17:33 +0000
Re: Code density mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-07-20 20:09 +0000
Re: compacting branches, was Code density John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-07-21 09:01 +0000
Re: compacting branches, was Code density anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-07-21 12:33 +0000
Re: compacting branches, was Code density Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2025-07-21 17:01 +0200
Re: compacting branches, was Code density anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-07-21 15:26 +0000
Re: compacting branches, was Code density Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2025-07-21 18:06 +0200
Re: compacting branches, was Code density anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-07-21 17:26 +0000
Re: compacting branches, was Code density Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2025-07-21 19:31 +0200
Re: Code density EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2025-07-21 10:50 -0400
Re: Code density anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-07-21 15:28 +0000
Re: Code density EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2025-07-21 17:08 -0400
Re: Code density anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-07-02 05:25 +0000
Re: Code density mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-07-01 21:49 +0000
Re: Code density scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-07-01 23:26 +0000
Re: Code density mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-07-02 00:04 +0000
Re: Code density anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-07-02 05:18 +0000
Re: Code density EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2025-07-02 11:20 -0400
Re: Code density mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-07-02 15:45 +0000
Re: Code density scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-07-02 16:56 +0000
Re: Code density mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-07-02 17:06 +0000
Re: Code density anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-06-18 06:26 +0000
Re: Code density BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2025-07-01 01:16 -0500
Re: Code density anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-07-01 15:23 +0000
Re: Code density BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2025-07-01 10:53 -0500
Re: Why I've Dropped In EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2025-06-11 14:56 -0400
Re: Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-11 19:37 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-12 19:01 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-13 20:12 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-13 20:50 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-11 21:17 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-06-11 21:35 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-11 23:13 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-06-12 13:41 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2025-06-12 09:38 -0400
Re: Why I've Dropped In mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-12 19:19 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-12 12:25 -0700
Re: Why I've Dropped In "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-12 12:27 -0700
Re: Why I've Dropped In anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-06-13 07:03 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-13 20:01 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In Robert Finch <robfi680@gmail.com> - 2025-06-14 04:35 -0400
Re: Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-14 15:22 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-06-14 17:30 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2025-06-20 17:11 +0200
Re: Why I've Dropped In Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2025-06-20 12:43 -0400
Re: Why I've Dropped In mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-20 17:38 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2025-06-20 13:48 -0400
Re: Why I've Dropped In mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-20 20:46 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2025-06-20 18:13 -0400
Re: Why I've Dropped In antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-06-21 01:48 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-21 02:51 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2025-06-24 08:15 +0200
Re: Why I've Dropped In "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-12 12:06 -0700
Re: Why I've Dropped In EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2025-06-12 09:12 -0400
Re: Why I've Dropped In mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-12 18:55 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-06-12 20:50 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-11 15:29 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-11 17:22 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-23 03:43 +0000
The Third Wish quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-23 12:43 +0000
Re: The Third Wish quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-23 12:47 +0000
Re: The Third Wish quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-24 17:19 +0000
Re: The Third Wish mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-24 21:57 +0000
Re: The Third Wish John Savard <quadibloc@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-25 07:31 +0000
Re: The Third Wish John Savard <quadibloc@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-27 05:28 +0000
Re: The Third Wish John Savard <quadibloc@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-02 05:16 +0000
Re: The Third Wish John Savard <quadibloc@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-02 07:04 +0000
Re: The Third Wish John Savard <quadibloc@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-03 05:52 +0000
Re: The Third Wish Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2025-07-02 22:57 -0700
Re: The Third Wish Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-07-03 06:59 +0000
Re: The Third Wish John Savard <quadibloc@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-03 09:43 +0000
Re: The Third Wish John Savard <quadibloc@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-03 11:24 +0000
Re: The Third Wish John Savard <quadibloc@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-03 11:35 +0000
Re: The Third Wish mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-07-16 01:11 +0000
Re: The Third Wish mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-07-16 01:08 +0000
Re: The Third Wish mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-07-16 18:22 +0000
Re: The Third Wish John Savard <quadibloc@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-16 23:36 +0000
Re: The Third Wish mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-07-16 23:58 +0000
Re: The Third Wish John Savard <quadibloc@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-17 03:42 +0000
Re: The Third Wish John Savard <quadibloc@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-17 04:01 +0000
Re: The Third Wish John Savard <quadibloc@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-17 04:10 +0000
Re: The Third Wish John Savard <quadibloc@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-17 04:24 +0000
Re: The Third Wish mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-07-17 15:16 +0000
Register windows (was: The Third Wish) Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2025-07-17 12:20 -0400
Re: Register windows mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-07-17 16:53 +0000
Re: Register windows (was: The Third Wish) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-07-17 17:38 +0000
Re: Register windows (was: The Third Wish) scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-07-17 19:17 +0000
Re: Register windows mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-07-17 19:38 +0000
Re: Register windows Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2025-07-17 16:18 -0400
Re: Register windows Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> - 2025-07-18 18:11 +0300
Re: Register windows Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2025-07-18 11:29 -0400
Re: Register windows Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> - 2025-07-18 23:17 +0300
Re: Register windows mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-07-20 17:28 +0000
Re: Register windows George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2025-07-20 22:27 -0400
Re: Register windows Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> - 2025-07-21 12:11 +0300
Re: Register windows John Savard <quadibloc@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-21 15:42 +0000
Re: Register windows MitchAlsup <user5857@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2025-08-21 21:48 +0000
Re: Register windows Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-08-23 08:51 +0000
Re: Register windows Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2025-08-29 17:07 -0400
Re: Register windows BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2025-08-30 01:47 -0500
Re: Register windows antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-08-30 15:36 +0000
Re: Register windows BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2025-08-30 13:19 -0500
Re: Register windows Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2025-08-30 14:22 -0400
Re: Register windows BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2025-08-30 13:46 -0500
Re: Register windows MitchAlsup <user5857@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2025-08-31 16:21 +0000
Re: Register windows Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-09-12 17:47 +0000
Re: Register windows MitchAlsup <user5857@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2025-09-12 19:02 +0000
Re: Register windows scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-09-14 15:16 +0000
Re: Register windows anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-09-17 05:55 +0000
Re: Register windows scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-09-17 13:58 +0000
Re: Register windows anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-08-31 05:36 +0000
Where's Ivan was Re: Register windows Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2025-07-20 22:27 -0700
Re: Where's Ivan was Re: Register windows John Savard <quadibloc@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-21 15:45 +0000
Re: Where's Ivan was Re: Register windows Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2025-07-21 12:05 -0700
Re: Where's Ivan was Re: Register windows scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-07-21 19:56 +0000
Re: Where's Ivan was Re: Register windows Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2025-07-21 22:02 -0700
Re: The Third Wish mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-07-17 15:02 +0000
Re: The Third Wish mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-07-17 14:59 +0000
Re: The Third Wish anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-07-17 16:28 +0000
Re: The Third Wish mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-07-17 19:21 +0000
Re: The Third Wish EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2025-07-18 12:29 -0400
Re: The Third Wish mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-07-17 14:49 +0000
Re: The Third Wish John Savard <quadibloc@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-17 18:03 +0000
Re: The Third Wish John Savard <quadibloc@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-17 18:27 +0000
Re: The Third Wish mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-07-17 20:04 +0000
Re: The Third Wish John Savard <quadibloc@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-17 21:00 +0000
Re: The Third Wish John Savard <quadibloc@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-17 21:26 +0000
Re: The Third Wish Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-07-18 19:47 +0000
Re: The Third Wish John Savard <quadibloc@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-19 02:51 +0000
Re: The Third Wish mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-07-17 21:29 +0000
Re: The Third Wish John Savard <quadibloc@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-17 21:45 +0000
Re: The Third Wish John Savard <quadibloc@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-17 21:58 +0000
Re: The Third Wish antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-07-18 15:39 +0000
Re: The Third Wish John Savard <quadibloc@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-18 17:08 +0000
Re: The Third Wish mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-07-18 19:38 +0000
Re: The Third Wish Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2025-07-17 12:20 -0700
Re: The Third Wish mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-07-17 19:52 +0000
PRF size (was: The Third Wish) Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2025-07-17 16:34 -0400
Re: PRF size mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-07-17 21:38 +0000
Re: PRF size EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2025-07-20 11:47 -0400
Re: PRF size mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-07-20 17:34 +0000
Re: The Third Wish John Savard <quadibloc@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-17 20:32 +0000
Re: The Third Wish Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2025-07-17 21:35 -0700
Re: The Third Wish John Savard <quadibloc@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-18 11:18 +0000
Re: The Third Wish John Savard <quadibloc@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-18 11:28 +0000
Re: The Third Wish John Savard <quadibloc@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-18 11:33 +0000
Re: The Third Wish mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-07-18 15:12 +0000
Re: The Third Wish Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2025-07-18 08:46 -0700
Re: The Third Wish scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-07-18 16:25 +0000
Re: The Third Wish John Savard <quadibloc@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-18 17:14 +0000
Re: The Third Wish mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-07-18 19:39 +0000
Re: The Third Wish anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-07-18 16:24 +0000
Re: The Third Wish Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2025-07-18 11:40 -0700
Re: The Third Wish mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-07-18 19:45 +0000
Re: The Third Wish EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2025-07-18 14:07 -0400
Re: The Third Wish antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-07-18 16:10 +0000
Re: The Third Wish anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-07-17 17:06 +0000
Re: The Third Wish antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-07-18 16:37 +0000
Re: The Third Wish mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-07-16 18:09 +0000
Re: The Third Wish John Savard <quadibloc@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-15 22:24 +0000
Re: The Third Wish John Savard <quadibloc@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-16 00:00 +0000
Re: The Third Wish John Savard <quadibloc@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-16 00:22 +0000
Re: The Third Wish John Savard <quadibloc@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-16 01:49 +0000
Re: The Third Wish Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-07-16 17:33 +0000
Re: The Third Wish John Savard <quadibloc@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-16 23:24 +0000
Re: The Third Wish John Savard <quadibloc@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-16 23:26 +0000
Re: The Third Wish mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-07-16 18:06 +0000
Re: The Third Wish "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-07-16 14:55 -0700
Re: The Third Wish John Savard <quadibloc@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-16 12:26 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-13 10:43 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In John Savard <quadibloc@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-22 04:30 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In John Savard <quadibloc@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-22 16:29 +0000
Satisfaction John Savard <quadibloc@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-24 11:07 +0000
Re: Satisfaction John Savard <quadibloc@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-24 16:45 +0000
Re: Satisfaction John Savard <quadibloc@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-24 20:04 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-16 03:46 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-12 15:38 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-12 19:24 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-13 00:11 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2025-06-16 17:14 -0500
Re: Why I've Dropped In mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-16 23:37 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-17 01:20 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-17 17:41 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-17 17:59 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2025-06-17 14:04 -0500
Re: Why I've Dropped In mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-17 21:19 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2025-06-18 01:16 -0500
Re: Why I've Dropped In Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2025-06-17 23:35 -0700
Re: Why I've Dropped In BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2025-06-18 02:10 -0500
Re: Why I've Dropped In antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-06-25 22:24 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-25 23:00 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-18 16:09 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-17 12:45 -0700
Re: Why I've Dropped In John Savard <quadibloc@invalid.invalid> - 2025-08-01 04:31 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2025-06-17 16:51 -0400
Re: Why I've Dropped In mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-17 21:11 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-06-18 06:58 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-06-18 14:45 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2025-06-17 01:28 -0500
Re: Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-17 12:58 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-17 13:12 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-17 17:52 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-06-17 18:14 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-06-18 14:10 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-18 15:14 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-18 18:16 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-18 22:00 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-06-18 23:20 +0000
Re: Why I've Dropped In mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) - 2025-06-19 01:03 +0000
Page 25 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 … 23 24 [25] 26 27 … 50 Next page →
| From | Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-07 13:01 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Bit addressing |
| Message-ID | <10730m3$1m75g$7@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #113053 |
On 8/7/2025 7:57 AM, Anton Ertl wrote: > Peter Flass <Peter@Iron-Spring.com> writes: > [IBM STRETCH bit-addressable] >> I don't get why bit-addressability was a thing? Intel iAPX 432 had it, >> too > > One might come to think that it's the signature of overambitious > projects that eventually fail. Interesting. While it seems to be sufficient to predict the failure of a project, it certainly isn't necessary. So I think calling it a signature is too extreme. > However, in the case of the IBM STRETCH, I think there's a good > excuse: If you go from word addressing to subunit addressing (not sure > why Stretch went there, however; does a supercomputer need that?) While perhaps not absolutely necessary, it is very useful. For example, inputting the parameters for, and showing the results of a simulation in human readable format, And for a compiler. While you could do all of those things on another (different architecture) computer, and transfer the results via say magnetic tape, that is pretty inconvenient and increases the cost for that additional computer. And there is interaction with the console. , why > stop at characters (especially given that character size at the time > was still not settled)? Why not continue down to bits? According to Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_7030_Stretch#Data_formats it supported both binary and decimal fixed point arithmetic (so it helps to have four bit "characters", the floating point representation had a four bit sign, and alphanumeric characters could be anywhere from 1-8 bits. And as you say, 6 bit characters were common, especially for scientific computers. > The S/360 then found the compromise that conquered the world: Byte > addressing with 8-bit bytes. Yes, but several years later. Another factor that may have contributed. According to the same Wikipedia article, the requirements for the system came from Edward Teller then at Lawrence Livermore Labs, so there may have been some classified requirement that led to bit addressability. > Why iAPX432 went for bit addressing at a time when byte addressing and > the 8-bit byte was firmly established, over ten years after the S/360 > and 5 years after the PDP-11 is a mystery, however. Agreed. -- - Stephen Fuld (e-mail address disguised to prevent spam)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Al Kossow <aek@bitsavers.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-07 13:34 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Bit addressing (was: 64 bits) |
| Message-ID | <10732k1$889h$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #113053 |
The TI TMS34020 graphics processor may have been the last CPU to have bit addressing.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-06 23:12 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: VAX |
| Message-ID | <slrn1097oaq.elkt.lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> |
| In reply to | #112989 |
On 2025-08-06, Anton Ertl <anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> wrote: > Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> writes: >>Not aware of any platforms that do/did ILP64. > > AFAIK the Cray-1 (1976) was the first 64-bit machine, and C for the > Cray-1 and successors implemented, as far as I can determine > > type bits > char 8 > short int 64 > int 64 > long int 64 > pointer 64 Not having a 16-bit integer type and not having a 32-bit integer type would make it very hard to adapt portable code, such as TCP/IP protocol processing.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-06 23:15 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: VAX |
| Message-ID | <1070nn9$25a5$1@gal.iecc.com> |
| In reply to | #113022 |
>> AFAIK the Cray-1 (1976) was the first 64-bit machine, and C for the >> Cray-1 and successors implemented, as far as I can determine >> >> type bits >> char 8 >> short int 64 >> int 64 >> long int 64 >> pointer 64 > >Not having a 16-bit integer type and not having a 32-bit integer type >would make it very hard to adapt portable code, such as TCP/IP protocol >processing. I'd think this was obvious, but if the code depends on word sizes and doesn't declare its variables to use those word sizes, I don't think "portable" is the right term. Perhaps "happens to work on some computers similar to the one it was originally written on." -- Regards, John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-06 23:32 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: VAX |
| Message-ID | <slrn1097pgv.elkt.lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> |
| In reply to | #113023 |
["Followup-To:" header set to comp.arch.] On 2025-08-06, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote: >>> AFAIK the Cray-1 (1976) was the first 64-bit machine, and C for the >>> Cray-1 and successors implemented, as far as I can determine >>> >>> type bits >>> char 8 >>> short int 64 >>> int 64 >>> long int 64 >>> pointer 64 >> >>Not having a 16-bit integer type and not having a 32-bit integer type >>would make it very hard to adapt portable code, such as TCP/IP protocol >>processing. > > I'd think this was obvious, but if the code depends on word sizes and doesn't > declare its variables to use those word sizes, I don't think "portable" is the > right term. My concern is how do you express yopur desire for having e.g. an int16 ? All the portable code I know defines int8, int16, int32 by means of a typedef that adds an appropriate alias for each of these back to a native type. If "short" is 64 bits, how do you define a 16 bit? Or did the compiler have native types __int16 etc? - Lars
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-07 02:56 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: word lengths in C, was VAX |
| Message-ID | <10714k8$oa0$1@gal.iecc.com> |
| In reply to | #113024 |
According to Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com>: >["Followup-To:" header set to comp.arch.] >On 2025-08-06, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote: >>>> AFAIK the Cray-1 (1976) was the first 64-bit machine, and C for the >>>> Cray-1 and successors implemented, as far as I can determine >>>> >>>> type bits >>>> char 8 >>>> short int 64 >>>> int 64 >>>> long int 64 >>>> pointer 64 >>> >>>Not having a 16-bit integer type and not having a 32-bit integer type >>>would make it very hard to adapt portable code, such as TCP/IP protocol >>>processing. >> >> I'd think this was obvious, but if the code depends on word sizes and doesn't >> declare its variables to use those word sizes, I don't think "portable" is the >> right term. > >My concern is how do you express yopur desire for having e.g. an int16 ? >All the portable code I know defines int8, int16, int32 by means of a >typedef that adds an appropriate alias for each of these back to a >native type. If "short" is 64 bits, how do you define a 16 bit? In modern C you use the values in limits.h to pick the type, and define macros that mask values to the size you need. In older C you did the same thing in much uglier ways. Writing code that is portable across different word sizes has always been tedious. >Or did the compiler have native types __int16 etc? Given how long ago it was, I doubt it. -- Regards, John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-07 11:21 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: VAX |
| Message-ID | <2025Aug7.132156@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> |
| In reply to | #113024 |
Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> writes: >["Followup-To:" header set to comp.arch.] >On 2025-08-06, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote: >>>> AFAIK the Cray-1 (1976) was the first 64-bit machine, and C for the >>>> Cray-1 and successors implemented, as far as I can determine >>>> >>>> type bits >>>> char 8 >>>> short int 64 >>>> int 64 >>>> long int 64 >>>> pointer 64 >>> >>>Not having a 16-bit integer type and not having a 32-bit integer type >>>would make it very hard to adapt portable code, such as TCP/IP protocol >>>processing. ... >My concern is how do you express yopur desire for having e.g. an int16 ? >All the portable code I know defines int8, int16, int32 by means of a >typedef that adds an appropriate alias for each of these back to a >native type. If "short" is 64 bits, how do you define a 16 bit? >Or did the compiler have native types __int16 etc? I doubt it. If you want to implement TCP/IP protocol processing on a Cray-1 or its successors, better use shifts for picking apart or assembling the headers. One might also think about using C's bit fields, but, at least if you want the result to be portable, AFAIK bit fields are too laxly defined to be usable for that. - anton -- 'Anyone trying for "industrial quality" ISA should avoid undefined behavior.' Mitch Alsup, <c17fcd89-f024-40e7-a594-88a85ac10d20o@googlegroups.com>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-07 13:34 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: VAX |
| Message-ID | <CX1lQ.747816$c%N2.659692@fx15.iad> |
| In reply to | #113043 |
anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) writes: >Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> writes: >>["Followup-To:" header set to comp.arch.] >>On 2025-08-06, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote: >... >>My concern is how do you express yopur desire for having e.g. an int16 ? >>All the portable code I know defines int8, int16, int32 by means of a >>typedef that adds an appropriate alias for each of these back to a >>native type. If "short" is 64 bits, how do you define a 16 bit? >>Or did the compiler have nativea types __int16 etc? > >I doubt it. If you want to implement TCP/IP protocol processing on a >Cray-1 or its successors, better use shifts for picking apart or >assembling the headers. One might also think about using C's bit >fields, but, at least if you want the result to be portable, AFAIK bit >fields are too laxly defined to be usable for that. The more likely solution would be to push the protocol processing into an attached I/O processor, in those days.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-06 23:38 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: VAX |
| Message-ID | <1070p17$3m69k$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #112989 |
On Wed, 06 Aug 2025 10:32:39 GMT, Anton Ertl wrote: > Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> writes: > >> Not aware of any platforms that do/did ILP64. > > AFAIK the Cray-1 (1976) was the first 64-bit machine ... But it was not byte-addressable. Its precursor CDC machines had 60-bit words, as I recall. DEC’s “large systems” family from around that era (PDP-6, PDP-10) had 36-bit words. And there were likely some other vendors offering 48-bit words, that kind of thing. Maybe some with word lengths even longer than 64 bits. I was thinking more specifically of machines from the byte-addressable era.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-04 12:42 +0300 |
| Subject | Re: VAX |
| Message-ID | <20250804124244.00000654@yahoo.com> |
| In reply to | #112847 |
On Sun, 03 Aug 2025 16:51:10 GMT anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) wrote: > antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) writes: > >One piece of supporting sofware > >was a VAX emulator IIRC called FX11: it allowed running unmodified > >VAX binaries. > > There was also a static binary translator for DecStation binaries. I > never used it, but a collegue tried to. He found that on the Prolog > systems that he tried it with (I think it was Quintus or SICStus), it > did not work, because that system did unusual things with the binary, > and that did not work on the result of the binary translation. Moral > of the story: Better use dynamic binary translation (which Apple did > for their 68K->PowerPC transition at around the same time). > IIRC, x386-to-Alpha translator was dynamic. Supposedly, VAX-to-Alpha was also dynamic. May be, MIPS-to-Alpha was static simply because it had much lower priority within DEC? > >OTOH Unix for Alpha was claimed to be pure 64-bit. > > It depends on the kind of purity you are aspiring to. After a bunch > of renamings it was finally called Tru64 UNIX. Not Pur64, but > Tru64:-) Before that, it was called Digital UNIX (but once DEC had > been bought by Compaq, that was no longer appropriate), and before > that, DEC OSF/1 AXP. > > The C environment for DEC OSF/1 was an I32LP64 setup, not an ILP64 > setup, so can you really call it pure? > > In addition there were some OS features for running ILP32 programs, > similar to Linux' MAP_32BIT flag for mmap(). IIRC Netscape Navigator > was compiled as ILP32 program (the C compiler had a flag for that), > and needed these OS features. > > - anton
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Al Kossow <aek@bitsavers.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-04 03:32 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: VAX |
| Message-ID | <106q28m$240oh$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #112864 |
On 8/4/25 2:42 AM, Michael S wrote: > May be, MIPS-to-Alpha was static simply because it had much lower > priority within DEC? MIPS products came out of DECWRL (the research group started to build Titan) and were stopgaps until the "real" architecture came out (Cutler's out of DECWest) I don't think it ever got much love out of DEC corporate and were just done so DEC didn't completely get their lunch eaten in the Unix workstation market.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-05 05:37 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: VAX |
| Message-ID | <106s5ah$2irb0$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #112865 |
On Mon, 4 Aug 2025 03:32:52 -0700, Al Kossow wrote: > MIPS products came out of DECWRL (the research group started to build > Titan) and were stopgaps until the "real" architecture came out > (Cutler's out of DECWest) > I don't think it ever got much love out of DEC corporate and were just > done so DEC didn't completely get their lunch eaten in the Unix > workstation market. There were many in high places at DEC who didn’t like Unix at all. Dave Cutler was one of them, and I think Ken Olsen, right at the top, as well.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-04 13:42 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: VAX |
| Message-ID | <2025Aug4.154232@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> |
| In reply to | #112864 |
Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> writes: >May be, MIPS-to-Alpha was static simply because it had much lower >priority within DEC? Skimming the article on "Binary Translation" in Digital Technical Journal Vol. 4 No. 4, 1992 <https://dn790009.ca.archive.org/0/items/bitsavers_decdtjdtjv_19086731/dtj_v04-04_1992.pdf>, it seems that both VEST (VAX VMS->Alpha VMS) and mx (MIPS Ultrix -> Alpha OSF/1) used a hybrid approach. These binary translators took an existing binary for one system and produced a binary for the the other system, but included a run-time system that would do binary translation of run-time-generated code. But for the Prolog system that did not work with mx the problem was that the binary looked different (IIRC Ultrix uses a.out format, and Digital OSF/1 used a different binary format), so the run-time component of the binary translator did not help. What would have been needed for that is a way to run the MIPS-Ultrix binary as-is, with the binary translation coming in out-of-band, either completely at run-time, or with the static part of the translated code looked up based on the original binary and loaded into address space beyond the reach of the 32-bit MIPS architecture supported by Ultrix. - anton -- 'Anyone trying for "industrial quality" ISA should avoid undefined behavior.' Mitch Alsup, <c17fcd89-f024-40e7-a594-88a85ac10d20o@googlegroups.com>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-04 16:50 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: VAX |
| Message-ID | <mfc36jF6c8fU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #112867 |
Anton Ertl wrote: > Skimming the article on "Binary Translation" in Digital Technical > Journal Vol. 4 No. 4, 1992 > <https://dn790009.ca.archive.org/0/items/bitsavers_decdtjdtjv_19086731/ > dtj_v04-04_1992.pdf>, > it seems that both VEST (VAX VMS->Alpha VMS) and mx (MIPS Ultrix -> > Alpha OSF/1) used a hybrid approach. These binary translators took an > existing binary for one system and produced a binary for the the other > system, but included a run-time system that would do binary > translation of run-time-generated code. Since our systems were recently re-written from BASIC to C, we didn't look at the translator, just recompiled for Alpha. There was the FX!32 runtime that allowed Intel windows programs to run under Alpha NT, never looked at Windows on Alpha at all.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-04 23:52 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: VAX |
| Message-ID | <106rh4l$1tua1$4@paganini.bofh.team> |
| In reply to | #112847 |
In comp.arch Anton Ertl <anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> wrote:
> antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) writes:
<snip>
>>OTOH Unix for Alpha was claimed to be pure 64-bit.
>
> It depends on the kind of purity you are aspiring to. After a bunch
> of renamings it was finally called Tru64 UNIX. Not Pur64, but
> Tru64:-) Before that, it was called Digital UNIX (but once DEC had
> been bought by Compaq, that was no longer appropriate), and before
> that, DEC OSF/1 AXP.
>
> The C environment for DEC OSF/1 was an I32LP64 setup, not an ILP64
> setup, so can you really call it pure?
What counts are OS interfaces. C while playing prominent role is
just one of programming languages. While 'int' leaked to early
system interfaces later one used abstract types for most things.
So as long as C provided 64-bit integer type (that is long) and
64-bit pointers this was OK.
And as others noticed, I32LP64 was very common.
Anyway, given system interfaces one could naturally implement
language were the only integer type is 64-bit. That is enough
for me that call this pure 64-bit.
> In addition there were some OS features for running ILP32 programs,
> similar to Linux' MAP_32BIT flag for mmap(). IIRC Netscape Navigator
> was compiled as ILP32 program (the C compiler had a flag for that),
> and needed these OS features.
Again, that not a problem for _my_ notion of purity.
--
Waldek Hebisch
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-05 05:35 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: VAX |
| Message-ID | <106s57d$2irb0$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #112924 |
On Mon, 4 Aug 2025 23:52:55 -0000 (UTC), Waldek Hebisch wrote: > And as others noticed, I32LP64 was very common. Still is the most common.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-05 01:31 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: VAX |
| Message-ID | <106rmtj$np5$1@reader1.panix.com> |
| In reply to | #112847 |
In article <2025Aug3.185110@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at>, Anton Ertl <anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> wrote: >[snip] >The C environment for DEC OSF/1 was an I32LP64 setup, not an ILP64 >setup, so can you really call it pure? I would. The definiton of "purity" I usually adopted during the transition to 64-bit CPUs was that pointers were 32-bits. The catchphrase at the time was, "64-bit clean", which usually meant that you didn't use int's to type pune for pointers. Many ABIs on modern day 64-bit machines are still I32LP64; I64 is really too large in many respects. >In addition there were some OS features for running ILP32 programs, >similar to Linux' MAP_32BIT flag for mmap(). IIRC Netscape Navigator >was compiled as ILP32 program (the C compiler had a flag for that), >and needed these OS features. MAP_32BIT is only used on x86-64 on Linux, and was originally a performance hack for allocating thread stacks: apparently, it was cheaper to do a thread switch with a stack below the 4GiB barrier (sign extension artifact maybe? Who knows...). But it's no longer required for that. But there's no indication that it was for supporting ILP32 on a 64-bit system. In the OS kernel, often times you want to allocate physical address space below 4GiB for e.g. device BARs; many devices are either 32-bit (but have to work on 64-bit systems) or work better with 32-bit BARs. - Dan C.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-05 13:46 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: VAX |
| Message-ID | <FWnkQ.830336$QtA1.728878@fx16.iad> |
| In reply to | #112926 |
cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) writes: >In article <2025Aug3.185110@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at>, >Anton Ertl <anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> wrote: >>[snip] >>The C environment for DEC OSF/1 was an I32LP64 setup, not an ILP64 >>setup, so can you really call it pure? >In the OS kernel, often times you want to allocate physical >address space below 4GiB for e.g. device BARs; many devices are >either 32-bit (but have to work on 64-bit systems) or work >better with 32-bit BARs. Indeed. Modern PCI controllers tend to support remapping a 64-bit physical address in the hardware to support devices that only advertise 32-bit bars[*]. The firmware (e.g. UEFI or BIOS) will setup the remapping registers and provide the address of the 64-bit aperture to the kernel via device tree or ACPI tables. [*] AHCI is the typical example, which uses BAR5.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-05 17:21 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: VAX |
| Message-ID | <106teif$d1a$1@reader1.panix.com> |
| In reply to | #112949 |
In article <FWnkQ.830336$QtA1.728878@fx16.iad>, Scott Lurndal <slp53@pacbell.net> wrote: >cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) writes: >>In article <2025Aug3.185110@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at>, >>Anton Ertl <anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> wrote: >>>[snip] >>>The C environment for DEC OSF/1 was an I32LP64 setup, not an ILP64 >>>setup, so can you really call it pure? > >>In the OS kernel, often times you want to allocate physical >>address space below 4GiB for e.g. device BARs; many devices are >>either 32-bit (but have to work on 64-bit systems) or work >>better with 32-bit BARs. > >Indeed. Modern PCI controllers tend to support remapping >a 64-bit physical address in the hardware to support devices >that only advertise 32-bit bars[*]. The firmware (e.g. UEFI >or BIOS) will setup the remapping registers and provide the >address of the 64-bit aperture to the kernel via device tree >or ACPI tables. > >[*] AHCI is the typical example, which uses BAR5. Yes; AHCI is an odd duck. They probably should have chosen BAR4 for the ABAR and reserved 5; then they could have extended it to 64-bit using the (BAR4, BAR5) pair. With the IOHC we have a lot more flexibility than we did previously. - Dan C.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-12 15:28 +0000 |
| Subject | ILP32 code on 64-bit substrate (was: VAX) |
| Message-ID | <2025Aug12.172827@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> |
| In reply to | #112926 |
cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) writes: >MAP_32BIT is only used on x86-64 on Linux, and was originally >a performance hack for allocating thread stacks: apparently, it >was cheaper to do a thread switch with a stack below the 4GiB >barrier (sign extension artifact maybe? Who knows...). But it's >no longer required for that. But there's no indication that it >was for supporting ILP32 on a 64-bit system. Reading up about x32, it requires quite a bit more than just allocating everything in the low 2GB. My memories (from reading about it, I never compiled a program for that usage myself) are that on Digital OSF/1, the corresponding usage did just that: Configure the compiler for ILP32, and allocate all memory in the low 2GB. I expect that types such as off_t would be defined appropriately, and any pointers in library-defined structures (e.g., FILE from <stdio.h>) consumed 8 bytes, even though the ILP32 code only accessed the bottom 4. Or maybe they had compiled the library also for ILP32. In those days fewer shared libraries were in play, and the number of system calls and their interface complexity in OSF/1 was probably closer to Unix v6 or so than to Linux today (or in 2012, when x32 was introduced), so all of that required a lot less work. - anton -- 'Anyone trying for "industrial quality" ISA should avoid undefined behavior.' Mitch Alsup, <c17fcd89-f024-40e7-a594-88a85ac10d20o@googlegroups.com>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 25 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 … 23 24 [25] 26 27 … 50 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.arch
csiph-web